Author's Perspective upon own work Writing Quality - Constructions are made neat, the character's dialogue and monologue can be easily identified, and is formed in an easy flow and continuation to prevent tongue-twisting and mind breaking. (3S) Stability of Updates - Terrible, has no scheduled timing, and is absolutely up to the Author when he has the next chapter prepared. Updates are random. (1S) Story Development - A slow grind, with a lot of character background in most chapters, but still making progress for story development. It is your typical, character flashback but doesn't take the whole chapter. (3S) Character Design - Two Korpsmen, One is a battle-hardened veteren, and the other somewhat in between gets yeeted to the DC universe. There is fixed and focused personality on the character, so readers could be able to tell the difference if ever such 'tremendous' EVENTS changed the characters. (the korpsmen) (4S) World Background - Just like how DC-Comics portrayed and shows it in their comics. (3S)

40k + LoL? 5 stsrs for me. . mjgernrnrnrjrjrjrnr right brbffn earn a living by what we are you doing today I Y camp and I will be Y camp and

DC Universe, DC characters feel like they are actually real and act reasonable. The two Guardsmen though, well they don't adhere to the lore. They commit heresy not just once, stay away if you do not like that.

This has an atmosphere of seriousness, so it is not all fun and laughs. This fanfic made me interested in the Krieg, as they seem super serious in battle, something that is kinda similar to my serious demeanor that has backfired in this meme filled world of ours. I have nothing to say, but be warned that this fanfic takes itself very seriously.

overall it's a great story 👍 (⁠ﾉ⁠◕⁠ヮ⁠◕⁠)⁠ﾉ⁠*⁠.⁠✧

seems pretty good would be shame that it doesnt get more attention due to lack of ratings, though the last chapter being a month ago is kind of disappointing

Latest Author's Announcement Contains Spoilers. Read at your discretion. A lot of readers, especially during the first few chapters in the first volume have all valid criticism about plot holes and characters that are doing or acting in ways that are not in ‘character’ for good example: a korpsman that is not silent and too suicidal. But the thing is that Masha’s character has been explained why she acts and thinks in such an unorthodox way compared to her peers, and it is because in her flashback that happened very far down into the story that she had an encounter with an Inquisitor and was inducted to the Inquisition’s party - although temporarily - the readers can then assume and fill in the gaps that she learned or was taught stuff during her time with the Inquisitor. Following such an event possibly happening, it is only reasonable to think that Masha has learned things or been taught things only to a certain degree and does not know all of it, and basically just the gist of it. So any mistakes that she carelessly and recklessly did such as speak of the names of the Chaos Gods, you can say it was a poor decision on her part. I like to tell my story without dropping their backstory in just a single chapter, I drop it like crumbs and use it to angle their character to the current. I mean, they had lives before the story began so it is logical to think that something at least surprising or out of place happened in their life.