Review Detail of Aporia in Abyssal Lord of the Magi World
Review detail
I don't know if I want to read this, There isn't any negative reviews so either it's that good or deleted, I'm leading to the latter. I also read very little but can't get into it, so can someone give me a detailed also a little spoiler review in the replies. Also if you like it, tell me what you like and dislike about it and if you didn't like it, tell me what you liked about it and didn't. There's just no In-depth review just people saying "just read it, it's good". To the description to the fans base, it all seems a little child like.
Abyssal Lord of the Magi World
Redsunworld
Liked by 10 people
LIKEReplies9
I find your "review" the most baseless. leave a bad rating if and only if you are going to point out why it is bad. if you want to know more about it before reading, then ask the people who have posted good reviews and if no replies read the free chaps fully before leaving a bad rating. what you are doing deserves to be deleted as that is uncalled for. and I as someone who came to see the comments before starting to read this novel find your's absolutely useless.
Its abouT one the strongest being jn the universe recently comes back to life and olans his rise and to achive a goal while also focusing on the life of ezquiel witch you meet early and then carry on to being to strongest and so on it has a lot of world building kinda complex if you wanna rush and not take your Time but its goOd.
what is the point of reviews, one person Hass 50 likes just repeating he wants more, that doesn't give anyone any base about how good the novel is or whether they may like it or not according to their preferences, thus guy gave 3 stars which is average neither good Orr bad not everyone wants to waste time reading multiple chapters when they could be reading soemthing they liked instead. the summary doesn't really explain if there is something unique about thus book so what better place to look for that answer than the reviews on it? where you can see what people liked and disliked about it (well that's how it works on Amazon)
WindMaster:I find your "review" the most baseless. leave a bad rating if and only if you are going to point out why it is bad. if you want to know more about it before reading, then ask the people who have posted good reviews and if no replies read the free chaps fully before leaving a bad rating. what you are doing deserves to be deleted as that is uncalled for. and I as someone who came to see the comments before starting to read this novel find your's absolutely useless.
even on amazon practices have developed such that only verified purchase comments are taken in for rating. you seem to have completely skipped my whole comment on your so called "review"
Solomolecule:what is the point of reviews, one person Hass 50 likes just repeating he wants more, that doesn't give anyone any base about how good the novel is or whether they may like it or not according to their preferences, thus guy gave 3 stars which is average neither good Orr bad not everyone wants to waste time reading multiple chapters when they could be reading soemthing they liked instead. the summary doesn't really explain if there is something unique about thus book so what better place to look for that answer than the reviews on it? where you can see what people liked and disliked about it (well that's how it works on Amazon)
WindMaster:even on amazon practices have developed such that only verified purchase comments are taken in for rating. you seem to have completely skipped my whole comment on your so called "review"
your reply made it seem to me like you were the original "reviewer". my bad. but now am even more confused, why are you sorta defending that person who gave 3 stars without even reading a single chap?. reviews are supposed to be given only after you read enough to know something about it. all he(/she) did was to complain about other reviewers while that person's was the most baseless one. that was my whole point.
Solomolecule:i didn't make a review tho?
I was just saying he gave an average score, not good or bad, also the best place for people to see their critique on reviews is where other reviews are, also a review reply wouldn't reach as many eyes
WindMaster:your reply made it seem to me like you were the original "reviewer". my bad. but now am even more confused, why are you sorta defending that person who gave 3 stars without even reading a single chap?. reviews are supposed to be given only after you read enough to know something about it. all he(/she) did was to complain about other reviewers while that person's was the most baseless one. that was my whole point.
the whole issue is he gave a rating (doesnt matter the grade, also this isn't average but bad when we compare it to WN standards, still ) to a novel without even reading it. and yiu are supposed to rate or review only what you have read. just because you want visibility giving a rating is not right.
Solomolecule:I was just saying he gave an average score, not good or bad, also the best place for people to see their critique on reviews is where other reviews are, also a review reply wouldn't reach as many eyes
