Review Detail of trekt in Reborn as Neji Hyuga with a system
Review detail
My review got deleted, but I will say it again. This novel is absolutly not worth reading. Normally this should be enough, concidering that the author has no problems with 5/5 reviews saying absolutly nothing. But it seems that the author got insecurities on a whole new level! Let me go through it fast: Quality - 3/5 Simply lacking english expertise, but still readable. Upload- 3/5 About once per day.Only uploaded 9 Chapters as of today. Story 1/5 Generic story you can find thousand of these alone on qidian, nothing unique. Character 1/5 Simply lacking, it's generic like the story, enough said. World 1/5 Naruro World, saw it a thousand times.
Reborn as Neji Hyuga with a system
Tensei_Rigan
Liked by 28 people
LIKEReplies54
No its not. Start deleting all these nonsense reviews that give you 5/5 stars, then we can talk. But you won't because you need these for your ego. As much as you like good reviews, the novel won't be better because of it nor does it show the reality.
Tensei_Rigan:Thanks for your detailed review. It's better than "This novel is worth only if you are immortal".
Stupid thing too say, the review system is there for a reason, so people can get a picture of the story before reading it. He wrote it, so he has to be open for critic, even if he dislikes it. Also I could like the story and still say that it is objectivly bad. It wouldnt change anything.
Genos134:Dude, if you do not like it, do not read it.
Chaosreigns:you didnt give any details as to why its bad. you basically just bashed it without any actual reasoning.
The review system is 100% broke, half of these 5 stars on anime fanfics are bots or people with a horrible standard of good novel. Qidan always abuses the review system when they decide to premium a novel, it's always spammed with 5 stars reviews that say something like, good good good good good good.... and thats it.
trekt:Stupid thing too say, the review system is there for a reason, so people can get a picture of the story before reading it. He wrote it, so he has to be open for critic, even if he dislikes it. Also I could like the story and still say that it is objectivly bad. It wouldnt change anything.
Yo m8,normally i wouldn't reply, but you said that you didn't have to provide a reason for rating this novel a low score ( which is a big no-no ) Your review is basically just spewing a ton of crap and expecting people to take your word for it, there's a reason why critics need to put an example for their points. Because for one, it makes the people who read your reviews understand your points and better, and two, it can make your reviews seem less like a douchebag haphazardly saying a bunch of crap.
Did you read what I wrote? You discredit yourself and while you may be correct about providing a reason, in this case it's not. My intention was never too write a full review. You may think thats being a douche, but honestly everything I sayd is the truth. Question for you, did you read the story?
DuchessPrick:Yo m8,normally i wouldn't reply, but you said that you didn't have to provide a reason for rating this novel a low score ( which is a big no-no ) Your review is basically just spewing a ton of crap and expecting people to take your word for it, there's a reason why critics need to put an example for their points. Because for one, it makes the people who read your reviews understand your points and better, and two, it can make your reviews seem less like a douchebag haphazardly saying a bunch of crap.
Hey, my intention isn't to write a full review, but I'll rate your novel low and i won't even give any reason why. Instead, I'll put crap like '1/5 generic ****' which nobody knows what it means. And how did I discredit myself? The only reason why I replied is because I read your sorry excuse for a review. And even though I haven't read this novel 'and have no intention to' I still won't let **** like this slide.
trekt:Did you read what I wrote? You discredit yourself and while you may be correct about providing a reason, in this case it's not. My intention was never too write a full review. You may think thats being a douche, but honestly everything I sayd is the truth. Question for you, did you read the story?
This comment says more about you, then about me. You are so angry, it shows that I was true with everything I sayd. Also what are these double standards, your reason for insulting me is only and only that you dont agree with me. While my review was not the best and I say it again was never meant too, I didnt lie and also read the story. Calling ME a douche while insulting, saying I talk bull**** while not even reading the story. Why are you playing a saint.
DuchessPrick:Hey, my intention isn't to write a full review, but I'll rate your novel low and i won't even give any reason why. Instead, I'll put crap like '1/5 generic ****' which nobody knows what it means. And how did I discredit myself? The only reason why I replied is because I read your sorry excuse for a review. And even though I haven't read this novel 'and have no intention to' I still won't let **** like this slide.
I think you're straying a bit too far from the reason I started an argument. You said that 'you didn't have to provide a reason for why you rated this novel a low score' what I'm trying to say is that logic is very crappy. By that same logic of 'I don't have to provide a reason I dislike something' I could say that I proactively **** on you because I don't like you as a person even though I didn't give any reason why.
trekt:This comment says more about you, then about me. You are so angry, it shows that I was true with everything I sayd. Also what are these double standards, your reason for insulting me is only and only that you dont agree with me. While my review was not the best and I say it again was never meant too, I didnt lie and also read the story. Calling ME a douche while insulting, saying I talk bull**** while not even reading the story. Why are you playing a saint.
trekt:This comment says more about you, then about me. You are so angry, it shows that I was true with everything I sayd. Also what are these double standards, your reason for insulting me is only and only that you dont agree with me. While my review was not the best and I say it again was never meant too, I didnt lie and also read the story. Calling ME a douche while insulting, saying I talk bull**** while not even reading the story. Why are you playing a saint.
No you don't have to provide a reason and I'm still staying strong on this. The whole discussion is happening because while you have your opinion, you don't practice what you preach. You are rude, a hypocrite and can't accept another opinion.
DuchessPrick:I think you're straying a bit too far from the reason I started an argument. You said that 'you didn't have to provide a reason for why you rated this novel a low score' what I'm trying to say is that logic is very crappy. By that same logic of 'I don't have to provide a reason I dislike something' I could say that I proactively **** on you because I don't like you as a person even though I didn't give any reason why.
Hmm yes, I will truly take what you say seriously. After all, somebody who makes a review (which could affect the rating of a novel) without even giving a reason is surely an individual you should trust.
trekt:No you don't have to provide a reason and I'm still staying strong on this. The whole discussion is happening because while you have your opinion, you don't practice what you preach. You are rude, a hypocrite and can't accept another opinion.
The rating only shows if people like it or not. 5/5 reviews also affect the rating. You are angry for no reason.
DuchessPrick:Hmm yes, I will truly take what you say seriously. After all, somebody who makes a review (which could affect the rating of a novel) without even giving a reason is surely an individual you should trust.
'only shows if people like it or not' are you daft? What do you think has more chance to attract new readers, stories that 'shows' if people like it or, or stories that don't?
trekt:The rating only shows if people like it or not. 5/5 reviews also affect the rating. You are angry for no reason.
DuchessPrick:'only shows if people like it or not' are you daft? What do you think has more chance to attract new readers, stories that 'shows' if people like it or, or stories that don't?
Do you think it's fair to decrease the chance of an author gaining new readers without even giving a reason why?
trekt:That's the point.