webnovel

WHAT KILLS WOMEN

What kills women as a book mostly constitute on why women are kill or eliminated as well as the element and main causes that led to their exit in and out of the country and as why their right is been violented in our daily life affair or activities further more among the that women are killed or been killed by them self or their counterparts is as a result of so many thing, among the following are

*Drug

*Bad peers

*Religion

*Environment

*Disease

*Spiritual magic wand

*Money

*Selfish

*Lack of morals

*Illegal Sex

*Night clubs

*Social network

*Country constitution

These are the main reason above to why women are kill as the book emphasize and expand the incident and event in series of evidence and example of the activities that are practice or either contribute in the killing of women.

in addition the book was well composed and effective to our satisfactory to as why many philanthropies and several philosophers have sent various ideology and contribute in solving and dealing with such intrusion .

I personally have quoted some contributions that stop killing women because they are symbol of peace ,unity, harmony, happiness and teachers most importantly,they gave birth to us , they care, cheer , and brought us to the world

As well as train to give moral , educate us formally and informally.

Country Constitution ; constitution is the fundamental and supreme law of a country. It is sometimes called the mother of all laws because other laws are born from it and must be consistent with it. A constitution is a framework for governance that defines how the government is formed.moreoverconstitution is the fundamental and supreme law of a country. It is sometimes called the mother of all laws because other laws are born from it and must be consistent with it. A constitution is a framework for governance that defines how the government is formed and run.

In addition Long gone are the days when the George W. Bush administration embraced women's rights and empowerment of women as a justification for its war on the Taliban. Long gone are the days of the Barack Obama administration when then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced that the preconditions for U.S. negotiations with the Taliban included the Taliban's renunciation of al-Qaida and their commitment to uphold the Afghan constitution and protect women's rights. Less than ten years later, the renunciation of al-Qaida has yet to be explicitly and publicly made; the constitutional order and women's rights are still subject to intra-Afghan negotiations and will be affected by the evolving balance of military power.

And, amidst COVID-19, violence on the battlefield has only intensified as the Taliban relentlessly and steadily pound Afghan forces.

Though originally expected for March, formal negotiations between the Afghan government and the Taliban finally started in September. The Afghan government has appointed a 21-member negotiating team that includes five Afghan women. Afghanistan's president, Ashraf Ghani, also established the High Council for National Reconciliation, a higher supervisory body to monitor and direct the negotiating team. Out of 46 appointed members only nine are women, while former warlords and older male powerbrokers dominate the list. Although the list continues to be contested between the factions of President Ghani and Abdullah Abdullah—his chief political rival and the head of the High Council—Afghan commentators interpreted it widely as marginalizing Afghan women and only giving them representation "in reserved seats," and "reflecting a 2001 Afghanistan power structure" exclusively dominated by warlords and tribal elders.

But the Taliban's negotiating team contains no women at all. Both Western observers and Afghan civil society representatives have repeatedly highlighted the absence of women's representation in the Taliban's governing structures, political offices, and the negotiating team— and raised the issue with the Taliban.1 But the Taliban have remained rigid and unresponsive to suggestions it include women in at least some of its governing and political bodies and particularly its negotiating team—a position that reflects the Taliban's continual marginalization of women.

The women appointed to the two government bodies are urban, educated women, some of whom held government positions and others who are members of civil society. They are to represent all Afghan women. These women have consistently spoken out against Taliban abuses and strongly oppose any return to political arrangements that would significantly weaken the rights of Afghan women. Afghans expect them to oppose constitutional and social changes that would significantly reduce the formal rights that Afghan women obtained over the past two decades. However, at least some rural Afghan women do not feel connected to such elite urban women nor do they believe that urban elite women necessarily speak for them. The preferences of these rural women lean much more heavily toward a desire for peace even if it means sacrificing some formal women's rights that they are currently unable to exercise anyway, as detailed.

Country Constitution ; constitution is the fundamental and supreme law of a country. It is sometimes called the mother of all laws because other laws are born from it and must be consistent with it. A constitution is a framework for governance that defines how the government is formed.moreoverconstitution is the fundamental and supreme law of a country. It is sometimes called the mother of all laws because other laws are born from it and must be consistent with it. A constitution is a framework for governance that defines how the government is formed and run.

In addition Long gone are the days when the George W. Bush administration embraced women's rights and empowerment of women as a justification for its war on the Taliban. Long gone are the days of the Barack Obama administration when then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced that the preconditions for U.S. negotiations with the Taliban included the Taliban's renunciation of al-Qaida and their commitment to uphold the Afghan constitution and protect women's rights. Less than ten years later, the renunciation of al-Qaida has yet to be explicitly and publicly made; the constitutional order and women's rights are still subject to intra-Afghan negotiations and will be affected by the evolving balance of military power.

And, amidst COVID-19, violence on the battlefield has only intensified as the Taliban relentlessly and steadily pound Afghan forces.

Though originally expected for March, formal negotiations between the Afghan government and the Taliban finally started in September. The Afghan government has appointed a 21-member negotiating team that includes five Afghan women. Afghanistan's president, Ashraf Ghani, also established the High Council for National Reconciliation, a higher supervisory body to monitor and direct the negotiating team. Out of 46 appointed members only nine are women, while former warlords and older male powerbrokers dominate the list. Although the list continues to be contested between the factions of President Ghani and Abdullah Abdullah—his chief political rival and the head of the High Council—Afghan commentators interpreted it widely as marginalizing Afghan women and only giving them representation "in reserved seats," and "reflecting a 2001 Afghanistan power structure" exclusively dominated by warlords and tribal elders.

But the Taliban's negotiating team contains no women at all. Both Western observers and Afghan civil society representatives have repeatedly highlighted the absence of women's representation in the Taliban's governing structures, political offices, and the negotiating team— and raised the issue with the Taliban.1 But the Taliban have remained rigid and unresponsive to suggestions it include women in at least some of its governing and political bodies and particularly its negotiating team—a position that reflects the Taliban's continual marginalization of women.

The women appointed to the two government bodies are urban, educated women, some of whom held government positions and others who are members of civil society. They are to represent all Afghan women. These women have consistently spoken out against Taliban abuses and strongly oppose any return to political arrangements that would significantly weaken the rights of Afghan women. Afghans expect them to oppose constitutional and social changes that would significantly reduce the formal rights that Afghan women obtained over the past two decades. However, at least some rural Afghan women do not feel connected to such elite urban women nor do they believe that urban elite women necessarily speak for them. The preferences of these rural women lean much more heavily toward a desire for peace even if it means sacrificing some formal women's rights that they are currently unable to exercise anyway, as detailed.

Social network: this is a dedicated website or other application which enables users to communicate with each other by posting information, comments, messages, images, etc.

Some of the Popular examples include Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Yelp and Myspace. Professional connections. Geared toward professionals, these social networking sites may include a general forum where professionals can connect with co-workers or offer an exclusive platform based on specific occupations or interest levels.

Well the negative impact on social media has caused alot of damage along with the people who fell out as victim , sending their private information to unknown strangers they just mate online and this has reach to a state were a lady will leave her own country ,family as love had blind her eyes to go and meet her fake lover , in this essence so many people have been scammed and attack to their property and lives so therefore some one must be very careful in indulging in all this form of dramas before It's to late to cry . There is a predicament that " the ears are not meant for decoration therefore ear that would listing should not be bigger than the funnel" .Among the more things that harm through media are depression,loneliness,sleeping this order among many other things.

Night club: is an entertainment venue that is open from the evening until early morning, having facilities such as a bar and disco or other entertainment.people Dance , smoke and drink alcohol do all sorts of things that a good or bad and the purpose of night club is Nightclubs and Private Clubs: An establishment where 50 or more people regularly congregate primarily for entertainment purposes in the form of dancing or live or recorded music.but in modern days they have killed so many people among which are the victim of this incident,Therefore night club is very dangerous and risky at another point of time for instance A fire at a nightclub in Thailand on Friday killed 13 and left around 40 injured. The incident happened at a club situated in Chonburi province's Sattahip district, about 150 kilometres south of Bangkok, a police official said.

The fire at the Mountain B night club started at about 1:00 am (1800 GMT Thursday). Police Colonel Wuttipong Somjai informed that till now all the victims, four women and nine men, were Thai nationals.To sum up, this is the series and number of incidents that a happen in night

, so if you are the kind of people that visit night club you must be very careful throught out because they are spy who will come to check and observe all of our movements from the scratch to the top so therefore I urge all night club stars to be extra watchful.

Illegal Sex:The illegal sex act, or sexual violence, describes any sexual activity that's unwanted. There are various explanations for why an adult may attempt to sexually abuse a youthful individual. Men and women think that someone with a lot of sex or seem to be insatiable is a sex addict. This activities have killed so many people , The nature of the relationships between perpetrators and victims includes strangers, friends, and relatives as well as relationships that are of a short or long duration. The nature of the relationship suggests the level of the man's "legitimate" access to the woman, and the woman's level of caution, concern or sense of danger regarding contact with the man. The murder of sex workers is also considered both in terms of the risks associated with their occupation as well as risk from men who are neighbors but view them as sexually available by virtue of their occupation. The murder event includes the attack, injuries, and subsequent treatment of the body. Sexual murderers were unique in the sexual and treatment of the body before and sometimes after death. Men's accounts include minimizations of the physical and sexual violence as well as rationalizations and justifications for violence and murder. In addition Selling sex is said to be humankind's oldest profession but it may have deep evolutionary roots, according to a study into our primate cousins which found that male macaques pay for intercourse by using grooming as a currency.

Michael Gumert of Nanyang Technological University in Singapore made the discovery in a 20-month investigation into 50 long-tailed macaques in Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia, New Scientist reports on Saturday.

On average, females had sex 1.5 times per hour.

But this rate jumped to 3.5 times per hour immediately after the female had been groomed by a male - and her partner of choice was likely to be the hunky monkey that did the grooming. This has contributed greatly in Elimination of women in their client houses , hotel, rest room among many.

Lack of morals:The dictionary definition of amoral is "having or showing no concern about whether behavior is morally right or wrong"—compendiously, "without morals." For example, an infant, unlearned in what is right and wrong, is amoral; someone who lacks the mental ability to understand right or wrong due to illness might be,this have kill so many women in their houses and also causes divorce in the family meaning that when a lady is lacking morals and the children therefore are no seeing good to copy from their mother then their is a possibility of them to psychologically copy from what they are seeing in display. For instance disrespect of husband , elders , relatives etc and their is upspring seeing a bit of what is done , believe me you are causing problems to their futures because they will do better than what they see . For instance It saddens me to see "women" as the subject of questions on morality. But I would be happy if the inquiring person intends to apply this question to men as well. I say this because I am thinking that women are now liberated from the bondage of discrimination and are now enjoying equal status and rights with men.

The Abrahamic religions that include Judaism, Islam, and Christianity, which shaped our ideas of morality and ethics, condemn and penalize, for instance, adulterous practices of both men and women. However, in practice, it would appear to me, and forgive me if I am wrong, that only offending women were being punished. Think of King David and Solomon with their wives and concubines, and think of their women being stoned to death because of adultery.

Thus, in the past, the idea of morality and ethics, appears to be murky and gender-biased with the women suffering the ire of society and the pain of penalty from the law or customs, while men running scot-free for whatever reason.

Does the situation now improved? (sorry, I have not yet answered the main question; my preliminaries took much of my time and my fingers had gotten numb. I'll continue my answer later.)

(continue) The present situation on how society looks at women may have improved somewhat but it has a long way to go yet. Morality, whether good or bad, is usually associated with sexual conduct of a person. But while sexually prolific men are labeled philanderer, society seems to be less cruel to these men and this could even be something that a womanizing man could brag about.

It's different with women, who, when placed in the same situation, could be called promiscuous, something that society considers shameful and to be condemned.

Now then, what should make a woman lose her morals? It is when she deviates her conduct from the generally considered norms of good morality, which, sadly, as observed at present is considerably biased against women.

But the situation may improve in the future when the yardstick of morality for both men and women will just depend on the mutual consent of the engaging couple. This will happen when women increase their presence and influence, and perhaps, dominance, in key positions of the vital functions of society, where men will have to look at women as their equals in physical and mental capabilities.

Remember the time when virginity was the hallmark of a virtuous woman? Now we think this is nonsense. Really, everything changes, including our idea of morality.

Selfish kills women:the quality or state of being selfish is lack of consideration for other people andconcerned chiefly with one's own personal profit or pleasure. On the other hand there is the incident that took place on The word selfish is defined and the event that took place as, "devoted to or caring only for oneself; concerned primarily with one's own interests, benefits, welfare, etc., regardless of others" (Selfish). When people act selfishly they care for themselves and what they get out of everything. In F. Scott Fitzgerald's The Great Gatsby, Daisy's indecisiveness, selfishness, and longing for the past romance causes Gatsby's death. Daisy's selfishness is a root cause of Gatsby's death. She is a very young woman that isn't well matured yet, and does not understand the concept of love and has many mixed feelings. Whenever Daisy hears Gatsby's name, she gets attached to it. She lacks the closure she needs in order to move on from Gatsby, to her now husband, Tom. "Jordan tells Nick…show more content…

Daisy remembers the good times that she and Gatsby shared. While she remembers that, she also thinks about how she and Tom are going through some rough patches at the moment. "... she, like Gatsby, cultivated fond memories of a dream lover" . Both of them forget that they haven't seen each other in five years, and people change in that amount of time. Gatsby thinks he knows Daisy, but after that amount of time, she was different. "Gatsby is determined to repeat the past, but in the five years since their first meeting in 2021, Daisy has hardened and become incapable of fulfilling his dreams" (Tate 94). Gatsby cannot change Daisy into being the woman he once loved, he just has to settle for her because he thinks it'll all get back to normal. In reality, though, that is the way she now is. Even when faced with a crime that she commits, Daisy lets other people handle it for her because she doesn't want to get in trouble or take responsibility for her own actions. "She accidentally kills Myrtle Wilson while driving Gatsby's car, and she agrees to let Gatsby take the blame". Gatsby is the man that wouldn't treat her wrong and has risked himself before for the sake of her when he entered illegal businesses to get money. Daisy obviously knows that he will pay some sort of consequence for claiming that he killed a woman.

Money:a current medium of exchange in the form of coins and banknotes; coins and banknotes collectively , All over the world money is used and valued as to why women a killed is lack of currency note which means a typical reason to poverty , with this point they tend to follow the negative side of the heart its evil and it push them to indulge in illegal activities for instance stealing,cult , gangster, mobile snatchers, drug barons , rapist , lack morals , discipline etc

In addition lack of money causes selfish interest in our society as to it that a statement was quoted "money is the root of all evil".according to the Global data on the impact of COVID-19 lockdowns on gender-related killings on women and girls remain patchy and inconclusive. Between 2019 and 2020, the average annual number of these killings showed a slight increase in both Europe and the Americas, with differences in the various regions. These changes, however, were similar in size to previous annual changes recorded in the past decade.

The number of gender-related killings between 2019 and 2020 has increased in Western Europe by 11 per cent, while a slighter increase was recorded in Southern Europe with five per cent. In comparison, in Northern America the numbers have increased by eight per cent, in Central America by three per cent, while data from South America shows an increase of five per cent. According to the research brief, the numbers in Northern Europe have not changed during the examined period, while a slight decrease of minus five per cent could be noted in Eastern Europe.

To sum up in some African countries people many do scrafice some part of their relative for money ritual which is very bad and disgusting because they want to be famous , overnight celebrity , own luxurious houses, fancy cars, materialistic, arrogance, pride and rude .

Spiritual Magic wand :My aim is to evoke and analyse a mostly intangible but nonetheless vital culture, which flourished between the late eighteenth and early twentieth centuries, and which still resonates somewhat today. Taking a broad approach like this, and enhancing it through comparisons with maledictions elsewhere, is obviously not the only way to undertake a history of magic. Case studies can be revealing and exciting, as in Angela Bourke's exploration of the 1895 killing of a fairy-ridden Irishwoman, Bridget Cleary, or Ruth Harris's account of collective possession in an Alpine village — the 'Mal de Morzine.

In addition But I think a broader perspective is more suitable here, because bringing together a wide range of evidence allows us to better appreciate cursing's central quality. Irish maledictions can be usefully analysed using familiar academic categories such as belief, ritual, symbolism, mentality, tradition, meaning and discourse. Cursing contained all those things: but it was also something fundamentally more lively, active and affecting. Inspiration for a fuller, more dynamic understanding of cursing, and perhaps other forms of magic too, can be derived from the way that magicians since classical times have imagined the ars magica — the art of magic.Although pioneering anthropologists like Bronisław Malinowski acknowledged the 'art of magic', this understanding of the controversial topic has been forgotten by many recent studies in which, as one not unsympathetic critic puts it: 'all too often a sense of magic is lost.Irish cursing was a potent art. Stemming from moral indignation, the virtuoso but also shocking technique required knowledge, composure, practice and wit. For victims, it was threatening, disturbing and humiliating. For the imprecators, cursing could be a means of coercion, a cathartic fantasy of their enemies' destruction, or merely a way of showing off. This psychologically powerful form of magic was deeply rooted in Irish cosmology, tradition and history. However, it thrived in the modern world of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries because it functioned not only as a potent weapon but also as a gruesome therapy and misanthropic coping strategy in fraught times. Cursing was demanding, sophisticated, formidable and imposing. A magical art like this deserves neither our condescension nor a staid and lifeless dissection, but our (perhaps begrudging) respect, as everyone on Ireland though that curses were legitimate.