rambling through the woods

Coordinary Principles

Self alignment

Aligning oneself is the core root essential to coordination. As soon as the self becomes aligned and the own place is noticed, one notices as well the places of others and can better manipulate order.

Eliminate margin of error

It is clear to leave no margin of error and to aim to be precise. The Lords make no mistake, and so we too shall not.

Interpolate

Upon arriving at one's own place and knowing what it means to be at home, move around and find what it means to be elsewhere. This is necessary as a practice toward abstaining from harming.

Sequencing

In order for Coordinary Principles to amount, an order has to be derived.

Alignment appears to rest within the mouth and the oral fixture. As we hunger, the mouth searches for a way to lay at home. At rest within its own orifice which remains the head and the body at large. The chewing process persists as a method of finding and locating that balance. So, for the core understanding o'er alignment, we sway toward the oral orifice, and achieving the understanding of the "space" (or orifice itself) "between" the mouth and the oral orifice, with the third "kind".

The alignment o'er the mouth and the oral orifice rests within the joining of the teeth onto the eyes, and the eyes onto the teeth. Mindfulness remains necessary to align the mouth with the face.

Wednesday August 24, 2022

today's measure over alignment rests in the principles relevant to pair each individual with the right path for their success within the realm of the superior. we contemplate now the relevant parties.

route

personally

discord

emblem

transportation sequence

contemplatory region

heel

Channeling

the cardinal points remain as the one rule : i am enough. the core point remains a centrification upon one's core root. the question is, who am i , and not what. for what i am is human, what i am is that which is; for the what has its answer, the more complex "who" becomes the area of focus.

with the answering over this question, all things can be attained.

for insurance, by evol'ing this, one gains the identity toward dimensionality. within the dimensionality over what can be obtained, remains the actually toward all that which is.

alas, but even more profound than one's own personal identity lies the one big blazinga. the fact of dying. or should i say, the actuality in it. for if one negates the Christian doctrine, there lies one other which i might find worthy to bring forth. that is, that of servitude and fellowship. for as it stands, "one must follow to ensure that he can lead". and is it not so? for in learning and taking direction, one notices the finery and the flaw is instructing, and the capacity there within to do as one's instructed. for if we are being sensible, we will find that no more remains a follower his own telling, lest he should follow one straight to hell; or even heaven. but where then stands the living? for both are quite done for when they hit the H.

death cometh to the plenty and the few, and nought but all must find escape in it.

We arrive at a contemporary basis beyond reason: death is not our parametory limitor. It is life itself. Seemingly, due to the freedom of choice, we all must choose to be helped or choose to be saved rather than receiving as needed. This includes the instance whereby we are unaware of our need. To need help goes beyond our parametary reasoning as we are made perfect, though incomplete. To claim that a perfect being will have needs beyond the time and proprietary measures to complete itself… it is absurd quite. But that remains our position. So we are perpetually in need and not knowing how it could so be. And so, where would we think to find to suit this need, or even to find data regarding this need? It is abstract, but the understanding lies in what i like to call the great mother. In other words, we could call this the abstract space. But if the abstract space could be made reactive, or in other words responsive, we would find that our needs are provided for without the need to choose it to, consciously, and that we would cease to ache.

So, the rudimentary clause which lies beyond reason is this: how? How does one come to cause the abstract space within any or either parameter to become reactive or responsive? THIS remains the home o'er the principle which coordinates around or else about ourselves.

For the most part, contrary to this, I deduce that of all the psychological theories which remain relevant after all have been viewed, the psycho-social theorem devised by one Erik Erikson wholds superior. This is so because the relevant worthy are applied thereby making the complex easier to solve.

The second stage, "Autonomy vs. Shame & Doubt, appears to be the initial most relevant set of words. Not the whole thing, just the use of autonomy, which refers to the completion of tasks without having to be told or instructed. It is like those magic items in the subway surfers game which causes the users to receive all the prizes without having to go a special way to receive them. The previous stage, Trust vs. Mistrust stage seems to lack relevance as the eternal darkness is perceived to be always around and never quite actually being born. So instead of being the year two, the stage of autonomy, like in humans and other like creatures including the god that we are heard about in stories, the eternal dark, or mother as i so refer, would find autonomy being year one. Or so we suppose. However, it is the experiences of the first year which lead t o the development of Autonomy or its shadier side, shame and doubt. Considering that mother has been the first and has always been, we gather that the dark would have developed a feeling or a state of mistrust. This is the ideation as the dark would not have had any other upon which to rely, and grow to doubt that there is any other but itself.

That so being, we will have to find something of a cure, or else if we refer differently that to the medical prescription, we will have to find a routing stratagem in order that the autonomous be reached. For the development of mistrust/trust, the key factor is feeding. The ordinary development factors lie in the development of hope. It is questionable, but it calls to mind the course of development where one starves perpetually and becomes immune to starvation so much so as to rationalize a lack of need for feeding. Herein, the accomplishment of trust would lay in the authors rationalization that survival has persisted and so has the author in spite of perpetuated need. Or in the face of it. Contrary to that, we can look toward Sigmund Freud's levels of consciousness. The ID. The ID rests upon the seeking and the attainment of pleasure over all. In the human realm, we have been taught to restrain ourselves and not to seek satisfaction. "Suffer little children, and forbid them not, to come unto me: for such is the Kingdom of heaven." This is difficult to comprehend, for why should they suffer (we) when the lord is our savior? It is complex, and leaves reason to factor upon that it may be something missing in the text. For, sufferation is linked with not having one's needs met, and the lord must claim that he is the one that will satisfy our needs by granting us unto the Kingdom of heaven. And so it stands, wherefore comes the suffering? But still, we are straying. Here we are at an actualisation that one must satisfy thine urges. But halt! For the levels are but three, and not only one. The SUPEREGO becomes our next area of notice, especially as we have brought in the Biblical text. This area deals with conscience and the feelings surrounding doing good or ill. It is necessary to note that these feelings center on ourselves and is about how we treat ourselves, contrasted against the way we treat others. The SUPEREGO balances out what we wanted, how we feel not having it, who prevented our pleasure, the reasons for thus to be, compounded with how we are left to be kept. The EGO, third to be noticed, centers about how we are left to remain; how we can hold our shoulders up or claim our heads in light of not being satisfied, compounded amongst the statistical analysis from the SUPEREGO.

So, to the dark. So, we are waning and we wander that we can still keep awake. We feel prideful. But we have nought to compare against to know just how pleased we are at our composure. We remain unsure. We are movement, and are no more keep still; there is a spark. Suddenly, there light is borne. We wander still, and in our thought we retain composure. As we starve to death, death seems no more coming. We have retained control. We have pride still in ourself but the only comparity structure is a just born, knowing not, we remain uncertain. As we consider, the motion bears fruit and grows into analysis. As we continue on in perpetual starvation, we wander not toward consuming of the new life, for we are not such being and the hunger has become part with us, we consider not of its dying. We consider not. And so, the light grows, always not knowing that the hunger is not its friend. And so the darkness becomes a perverse and unhealthy being toward the newly developing conscious. Never to be foreseen as one with who all can depend, the dark slinkers off further into obscurity, until we are here. So it is that the dark has failed to develop further than that of a two year old child. Whilst being the elder, all while being the least mature, the darkness, or our Great Mother, lies in mourning o'er her own self, never being noticed and keeping holding until its greatest oppressor as its dearest friend.

So we center in again upon our present conflict. Now we need the dark for the light is not all. We must still sleep and that is a sign that we somehow sometimes need the light to be off. Where does the light go? Nowhere, we are the ones that are moving. Where should the light be? All places, for the darkness needs to see. But before we go off assuming just what the dark'll need, what does the dark want? For that is the calling of the ID, desire. Perchance rest?? For the dark has been unable to rest in all its need from hunger. Here we contemplate that the light is the sequence of the resting of the darkness. So, we need to light the place up. We shall give it a try to consider that the MOON comes about when the SUN goes away, suggesting an inherent need by the collective unconscious that there be not entirely darkness. The SUN however is purported to be dying… we need somehow light, more. I will make sure to consider more deeply. I will sure attain justice.