Nik_6146

I like your work, even though I'm not an active commenter, but your work often makes me smile and look forward to the next chapter, so please get well soon, and I'll be happy to see the story continue. And if I have the opportunity, I'd like to make a suggestion. Before that, the protagonist was always ready for a confrontation, and I would like to see him in an unknown environment, fighting an unknown enemy, and how he could use his abilities creatively, such as creating something with his mechanism to match the specific enemy he encounters during the battle. However, this is just my imagination. I will not keep you any longer, and I hope you recover quickly.

As always, it's great, brother. I really like the way you build relationships between the characters.

+1

Why does he feel like this? The dude is literally acting like a small and shy fool.

Will he stick it out every time, even in a normal conversation, even if the person has already heard about it? It's time for the boy to become a little more confident in himself.

The topic of the wand's true owner is quite controversial, but here's what I found on the wiki: "To win a wand, one must overpower and hence defeat its master in some way. However, it should be noted that wands usually stayed loyal to their original owners. For example, even if a wizard was disarmed or lost a fight while carrying his wand, the wand would have developed an affinity with its original owner so that it would not be given up easily. Therefore, simply disarming a wizard might not be enough to win over a wand's allegiance. Wands would also not be won in practice duels as the perceived levity of the situation would prevent the wand from abandoning its defeated master. A wand's core was a notable factor of this rule as well. Depending on the core, a wand might have been more or less likely to change loyalties. Wands with a core of Unicorn hair were noted be the least likely to change loyalties, whereas Dragon heartstring was the most likely (though it always bonded strongly with its current owner). Even when won, wands would often still retain some fealty to the original owner. The only exception to this was the Elder Wand, which was "completely unsentimental" and would only be loyal to strength. In other words, when won, it switched its allegiance entirely. The method of victory could be even as subtle as ordering a subordinate creature to slay the opponent as opposed to doing it oneself, as Lord Voldemort ordered Nagini to kill Severus Snape in belief that Snape had mastery over the Elder Wand. It should be noted that only the Elder Wand, when "owned" by a defeated wizard, would turn allegiance to the victor, even if they were not using it or even had it on their person during combat, as the Elder Wand was only loyal to power/strength through the victory over its previous holder. This was evidenced when Harry Potter simultaneously became the master of both Draco Malfoy's wand and the Elder Wand when he defeated Draco (who was the master of both having disarmed Dumbledore yet possessed only one of them at the time)."

I enjoyed reading this. It was fun. I personally liked the main character and how the characters interact with each other. I would like to wish the author good luck and good mood. I hope the story will come to an end, and not be abandoned.

☕

Everything is cool, I liked it ..............................................................................................................................

Thanks for the chapter