
of reading
5166
Read books
First of all, great fight pacing! Second, was that the English incantation for Sukuna’s World Cutting Slash? I can't really remember the original one, but it definitely sounded like it. Third, will Logan survive? Technically, he was chopped into pieces, bones included. According to Marvel logic, he shouldn't survive this, but hey, who knows! It crossed my mind that maybe Hank (Beast) could stitch Wolverine's body back together for the funeral service. Once his parts are reattached, his healing factor might kick back in, allowing him to fully heal and revive. It’s a solid option if you want to keep the character around, since honestly, I love Wolverine (unless you, as the author, don't really like him, of course). This theory doesn't take away from the MC's attack at all, because almost no one survives a hit like that. The only ones I can think of who have pulled off something similar in the comics are Deadpool and Hulk. Deadpool, on top of being cursed by Thanos so he can't die, has a healing factor tied to his cancer, meaning that as long as he isn't vaporized at a cellular level and a piece of him remains, he can regenerate. On the other hand, characters like Thor or Thanos would have died instantly from that attack. With Wolverine, we can leave that benefit of the doubt: Hank stitches him up so he’s whole for the burial, and boom! He comes back to life thanks to his insane regeneration. Great chapter!
A menos fuiste lo suficientemente humano para no literalmente poner la descripción de todos los pies
And so many people are bothering you about whether you use AI or something like that. I checked the chats because I saw that author's note, and honestly, I didn't understand, and I still don't understand, why. I didn't see anything criticizing you in the chats; there were only supportive people. So where do they tell you this, in private or something?
You're right about that; basically, Two for One is more of an urban legend, like the boogeyman, as you say. Only the higher authorities and the highest-ranking heroes knew that he was categorized as the symbol of evil. So, in that text you posted, it's very likely that something could be changed, like, "He's more dangerous than the mythical All for One," or something like that.
Pero que le pasa ? Se vuelve sicópata si no mata o juzga a la gente o algo así como si necesitara juzgar a la gente para ser feliz , sinceramente espero que se arregle porque será un problemón cunado se averigüe.
I sincerely hope that in the end he can reconcile and have friendships with his family and friends, because having a sad protagonist that nobody wants to talk to will create bad dynamics in the story, I think.
Honestly, I love what you're doing. You're slowly building up both the protagonist's development and the manga readers' reactions, and it's so captivating! So far, it makes perfect sense that the perspectives are limited to Spidey's friends and editor Edward, since it's 'technically' just a comic. I imagine you're keeping up your sleeve the summoning of those characters who will turn Marvel's daily life upside down, right? What intrigues me is the length: I don't know if you plan for the One Punch Man manga to end the Boros Monster Resolution arc or if you're going to continue to the current stage where they're fighting the machines. I imagine it'll be much shorter because you just said this is going to be a short manga (and the manga is already going on for a long time with over 200 chapters). On the other hand, if we're talking about short manga with impactful stories, we have Kimetsu no Yaiba, although honestly, I have no idea how you could incorporate it into this story and make it make sense like you did with the Tokyo Ghoul manga, highlighting the mutant situation. Keep going, the story has potential, please don't abandon it.
Mejor apunta todo eso autor porque es fácil olvidar las cosas
You're right to complain about the people commenting on this passage, but we have to keep in mind that it's a matter of national perspective: most people tend to defend or qualify their country's history. If the author is Russian, it's not surprising that he has that view, since in Russia Stalin's figure is still respected by certain sectors. History is full of leaders in every country—including Putin's current government—who have caused direct or indirect deaths through wars or political interests. That the author gives him a favorable treatment in a work of fiction isn't so bad, as long as the story doesn't justify crimes against humanity or promote them as something positive.
You're right to complain about the people commenting on this passage, but we have to keep in mind that it's a matter of national perspective: most people tend to defend or qualify their country's history. If the author is Russian, it's not surprising that he has that view, since in Russia Stalin's figure is still respected by certain sectors. History is full of leaders in every country—including Putin's current government—who have caused direct or indirect deaths through wars or political interests. That the author gives him a favorable treatment in a work of fiction isn't so bad, as long as the story doesn't justify crimes against humanity or promote them as something positive.