Ralifar

Nope, your counter of using it's English equivalent even further cements that you're wrong as the two words are not the same, grammatically speaking. I already gave you the actual textbook answer on why you were wrong, but clearly you won't take my word on it. So don't. Google Purdue OWL(online writing lab). It is one of the best online sources for any writing and grammar questions anyone could possibly have concerning the English language.

You're completely wrong in the case where "manga" can be plural by writing it as "mangas." You're 100% wrong when you say it doesn't make grammatical sense. It makes complete grammatical sense. The issue here is that grammar doesn't always make logical sense. Although "manga" isn't actually one of the English words that another commenter was pointing out like "moose" or "aircraft" that don't follow the norm. The word "manga" does actually follow proper grammar. It is a word that is not an English word. It is a borrowed word. Borrowed words often follow the grammatical structure of the language they are borrowed from. "Manga" is Japanese. Saying "mangas" is completely incorrect as that is not the plural form of the Japanese word.

Well, there's 2 options for that. One, the authors are sick perverts, or two, the author's just have no idea what children are like. They're never around them and never associate with them, so instead of trying to do some research and figure out how little kids would really behave, they just choose to treat them like miniadults.

When he was explaining about how he got the light element he blatantly lied. He says, "When I awakened my mana core, I automatically gained an affinity to the light element." He didn't gain an affinity to the light element until after he received his second blessing, long after he awakened his mana core. the "When" would have to be changed to "After" to make that sentence not technically be a lie.

While that may be the case, what about this situation or anything that has occurred would lead him to think that? Nothing...

The American Psychological Association as well as many other organizations throughout the world classify autism as a disorder. I kind of think you need to do more research yourself before you start criticizing others. You are also only referencing one class of autistic individuals. Autism is kind of a BS diagnoses. It covers too much, that's why it's referred to as autism spectrum disorder. Some individuals are as you say, and just think a little differently and also have higher functionality on certain things like math or languages, etc. Some are barely functional and do not have any higher skills though. There are people everywhere in between.

This really makes no sense at all. a 4 year old barely has the coordination to run without falling over. Let alone wield a sword.

I'm confused about what anyone thought would happen here? What were they expecting from a 4 and a half year old that has never received any training of any kind.

It means something. It's not a very good metric for intelligence, but it is guaranteed that a person with a high iq will be rather intelligent. It is biased, and can't be fully trusted.