RadicalHuman02

Why was almight brought up when it was about Gilgamesh and Superman

Real

I mentioned both just in case but it seems that wasn't good enough and you wanted to ride me into oblivion for no reason. I mentioned both things, that is a fact. You can go back and read the comment, anything you say afterwards is a matter of opinion and personal belief instead of a fact. So don't behave as if you're correct.

I said I don't have a proper handle on the noble ways, in reference to medieval etiquette and what not. Get off that horse you're riding.

a year late but idk genocide is something in common with a mustache wearing Germannnn sooooo

brother if he can't win he should just pack it up and let captain marvel get folded by thanos instead

I might skip to chapter 500 to see if the writing changed

this was 4 years ago so I gotta ask. Does he change at all? Does the writing get better? I'm only reading because I am hoping that the author improves his writing in these 300+ chapters

did it continue being cringe?

End game hero? This whole thing is a multiversal story. Superman wouldn't even scratch endgame unless you bring out the op comic feats. it all depends on which Superman you're talking about. Gilgamesh is just idk.. so boring. I know people are down bad for him and thinks he is cool. But he is lowkey so tiring at this point. Superman in my opinion is a much better option and once Law combines all the Fev, Shimmer and what not he will be very strong. But with Superman he will still need to put up a fight. Law isn't a brute so he wouldn't be trying to go band for band with Superman in a contest of pure physical might unless he wants to test out his new strength.