webnovel

Writing Whatever Comes To Mind

Very Interesting

DungeonLife · ファンタジー
レビュー数が足りません
4 Chs

Government

Fiscal Federalism the Federal government today affects society and states through money

The pattern of spending, taxing, and providing

The Grant System

Categorical grants, federal grants used for specific purposes, strings attached

Ex. Project grants-based on merit, Formula grants=amount varies based on formulas

Block grants: federal grants given more or less automatically to support broad programs

Grants are given to states and local governments

The Scramble for Federal Dollars-normal years like not COVID

350 billion in grants every year

Universalism- a little something for everybody

The Mandate Blues

Mandates are the "strings" attached to federal money

Unfunded mandates are requirements on state and local governments–no money hard states

Ex. Age discrimination acct of 1986, asbestos hazard emergency act of 1986, safe drinking water 1986, clean air 1990, Americans with disabilities 1990, national voter registration act 1993

Baker v Carr

Redistricting not justiciable at first

14th amendment equal protection clause

Decision: reapportionment justiciable

Established one person, one vote: no votes counted more than any other vote and got supreme court in political questions created 6 testaments for justiciable or not

Shaw v Reno

South Carolina had 20% pop Got 2 districts 1 full of gerrymandering racial gerrymandering

Argued on equal protection clause because solely on race

Court ruled districts drawn based only on race unconstitutional even with noble cause and still stands

CONGRESS CAUCUSES-group of people working together

Intraparty- regardless of party members share same ideology, conservative opportunity society, democratic study group

Personal interest- members share interest in an issue (Human rights, congressional family)

Constituency (subdivided by regional, national, state/district, and industry)-Members have similar constituencies (Black, border, automotive)

Committees deal with specific policies

Authorization committees-

Establish government policies, propose solutions to public problems and decide on budgets

Each house has several authorizing committees (called "standing")

Appropriations Committees-

Approve of funding for programs/policies of the authorization committees

Each house has only one appropriations committee

Standing Committees-

Permanent committees in each house and deal with policy in broad areas of legislation such as finance, trade, foreign policy

Subcommittees-

Permanent subdivisions of standing committees, 215 in Congress as of the year 2000-ex: Asia and the Pacific

Select Committees-

Temporary, deal with special cases like investigations

Joint Committees-

Permanent, has members from both House and Senate, deal with matters best to have both houses work together like economic policy

Conference Committees-

Temporary, compromises on bills passed by both houses

Congressional defense

Leaders/Chairmen-

Chosen by and from majority party

Process of selection has been subject to change(from party leaders to secret ballot etc.)

Term limits have been limited over the years

Traditionally, seniority is considered

The amount of power has fluctuated over the years

Membership-

Majority party and seniority are factors, also party loyalty

Members usually limited to two "major" committees and one" minor: and up to 3-7 subcommittees

Often can reflect constituency (membership in agriculture committee if representing farmers)

Sometimes apply and "run" for more popular committees with more influence (Armed services, appropriations, finance, ways and means, rules(house), senate (foreign relations, judiciary)

Energy and commerce attract many lobbyists

HOW A BILL BECOMES A LAW

Chief Legislator, Chief Diplomat, commander in chief, Chief of state, chief jurist, head of political party, chief economist

Chief Legislator, Chief Diplomat, commander in chief, Chief of state, chief jurist, head of political party, chief economist

THE WEST WING

The staff of the white house

Numbers more than 500

Appointments to the office in white house staff do not require Senate consent besides Cabinet

Officials less subject to testifying before Congress since they have a greater degree of executive privilege protection

Presidents seeks loyal people (Not as divided as Cabinet)

Executive Privilege extends to White House Staff

Ways Presidents Interacts

Pyramid Structure- president's subordinates report to him through chain of command headed by chief of staff(Nixon, Eisenhower, Reagan) (MOST USED)

Circular Structure- Several of the president's assistants report directly to him(Jimmy Carter)

Ad Hoc Structure- Several subordinates, cabinet officers, and committees report directly to the president on different matters

Office of Management Budget OMB: prepares annual budget and reviews federal programs

NSC National Security Council: coordinates foreign/military policy. Increasing importance of the National Security Adviser since Nixon

CEA Council of Economic Advisors : 3 person advisory group on economic policy

Heads of Cabinet departments and 6 others all appointed by President with Senate consent not currently elected congressmen or senators

THE JUDICIARY -PATHS

Us district courts to us courts of appeal to us supreme court

State district courts too state courts of appeal to state supreme court to us supreme court

Federal court required is the supreme court by constitution

Step 1 DISTRICT COOURTS

94- hears

Step 3 SUPREME COURT

2003-argued 84 cases decided 71

Hear appeals writ of certiorari

Rule of 4- 4 justices needed (quorum) to agree to hear a case

THE JUDICIARY

Appointment –president appoints judges for all federal court vacancies, Senate must confirm all nominations by majority vote (advice and consent), senatorial courtesy tradition for pres. to seek approval from local senators

Types of opinions- takes months and many drafts Majority opinion - 1 justice in the majority must draft an opinion setting out the reasons for their decision

Concurring opinion- justices who agree for other reasons can give their opinions

Dissenting opinion- justices who disagree with the opinion write their side

MARBURY V MADISON 1803

JUDICIAL REVIEW

John Adams last few days of presidency midnight appointments

Marbury justice of peace nomination senate confirmed

Jefferson takes over

Secretary of state had to deliver the jobs not all delivered before presidency changed

New secretary Madison stops all the jobs that didn't get delivered

Marshall doesn't rule in favor in either and rules judiciary act unconstitutional that could make the supreme court able to rule the case because the decision between Marbury and Madison would be ignored by either party that didn't get their way

ESTABLISHES JUDICIAL REVIEW POWER TO DECLARE A LAW UNCONSTITUTIONAL

Dramatically expands supreme court power

Majority opinion -- emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is... if the courts

It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases, must of necessity expound and interpret that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each.

Congress can't pass legislation that conflicts with the Constitution because the supremacy clause places the Constitution above laws

Although what Madison did was illegal the appointments was beyond the supreme court's judgement

ORIGINALISTS VS LIVING CONSTITUTIONALISTS

18th amendment minor execution ruled unconstitutional

President appoints judges which senate must confirm

Congress has power to impeach judges may amend the constitution if the courts find law unconstitutional

CHEROKEE NATION V STATE OF GEORGIA 1831

Supreme Court Ruling was not enforced must rely on others to enforce

Andrew Jackson

Implementation Brown v Board of Education

10 years after 1% desegregation

"all deliberate speed"

Not elected appointed has to have ideologies "above politics"

CJ Earl Warren CJ Warren Burger

Judicial Activism interpret law loosely using power to promote preferred goals use own values

Judicial restraint legislators should make law rule like previous cases

Liberal democrat left

Conservative Republican right

BUREACRACY-FOURTH BRANCH-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rule by desks-government by clerks-professional corps of officials-organized in a pyramid hierarchy-function under impersonal, uniform rules& procedures cft hnj

FEMA CIA FBI NASA

4+million employees 2.7 civilians "civil servants" 1.5 million uniformed military personnel

President only appoints 3% 3,500 (patronage/political appointments)

15 cabinet level departments

200+ independent agencies with 2,000+ bureaus, divisions, branches, etc.

Biggest-dept of defense, us postal service, veterans administration

Implementation –carry out laws executive orders

administration – routine administrative work; provide services

Regulation- issue rules and regulations that impact public

15 cabinet departments headed by cabinet secretary in specific policy area own budget

Separate status outside executive branch given specific mandate generally perform a service function not regulatory SSA, CIA, NASA, EPA

INDEPENDENT REGULATORY COMMISIONS

Ircs exist to regulate a specific economic activity or interest

Federal communications commission federal reserve board

Operate independently from congress and president

Government CORPORATIONS

Government owned businesses created by Congress

Supposed to be profitable-may or may not be profitable but serve a public need

US POSTAL SERVICE, AMTRAK, TENESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY, CORPORATION FOR PUBLIC BROADCASTING

Bureaucrats 97% are career government employees 10% in Washington dc

30%% for D.O.D.-military

Less than 15% for social agencies.

Most are white collar workers secretaries, clerks, lawyers, and engineers

Civil employees more diverse demographically than congress

CIVIL LIBERTIES

Concerned with basic guarantees and freedoms that are protected from government interference

Personal rights and freedoms which the federal government cannot abridge either by law constitution or judicial interpretation

CIVIL RIGHTS

Are the policies designed to guarantee the rights of individuals to receive equal treatment under the law. They are guaranteed by the government through laws protecting various categories of people such as race, age, etc.

We expect government to stay out of our civil liberties and to act in order to protect our civil rights

IN 1787 WHEN THE CONSTITUTION WAS WRITTEN BASIC PROTECTIONS FROM GOVERNMENT ACTION WERE INCLUDED IN ARTICLE 1 SECTION 9 WHICH PROHIBITED EXPOST FACTO LAWS BILLS OF ATTAINDER AND SUSPENSION OF HABEAS CORPUS. HOWEVER MANY OF THE STATES FELT THAT THIS WAS INADEQUATE AND IN ORDER TO PROTECT AMERICANS LIBERTY THEY DEMANDED A SPECIFIC BILL OF RIGHTS BEFORE THEY WOULD AGREE TO RATIFY THE CONSTITUTION.

THE BILL OF RIGHTS CONSISTES OF THE FIRST TEN AMENDEMNTS

AT TIME ADOOPTED NO INTERNET TELEVISION NEW MEDIA BUT MEANINGS STILL DEBATEED AND APPLIED TODAY

Barron v Baltimore Bill of Rights only applies to Congress, not state governments

14th amendment 1868 ties states to bill of rights

No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States

Nor shall any state deprive any person of life liberty or property without due process of law

Nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws

Privileges and immunities, due process, equal protection

THE INCOROPORATION DOCTRINE-constitutional doctrine whereby selected provisions of the bill of rights are made applicable to the states through the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment-MUST SUE AND WIN AGAINST ONE STATE TO GET IT INCORPORATED IN ALL STATES

1925 Gitlow v. New York – states could not abridge free speech due to 14th amendment due process

Although court upheld New York law free speech protected by 14th amendment

As soon as case is won it is applied to all other states

1937 Palko v Connecticut

Schenck v US-demeaning draft and war WW1 jailed

FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION

Court protective of ideas, unpopular and political speech require greatest protection

No prior restraint, efforts to censor expression

Protected symbolic speech, parody

Unprotected speech may come into conflict with government duties and obligations

Libel and obscenity are not protected

Time, place, and manner CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER TEST 1919 Schenck to

Brandenburg v Ohio LIKELY INCITING OR PRODUCING IMMINENT LAWLESS ACTION 1969

US v O'Brien 1968 Burning draft card is "symbolic speech"? Yes

What will Court decide? Vietnam War draft law in Congress furthered legit government interest Brien stays in prison

Miller v. California-obscenity

Illustrations of sexual nature OBSCENITY-material with no social value which describes conduct in an offensive way

Stated obscene material is not protected by the First Amendment limited by applying community standards

Government may require a permit to use a public facility of assembly

Requires equal treatment of even unpopular views

Assembly must be peaceful

Sheppard v Maxwell (1966)-Dr. Sam Sheppard received so much pretrial publicity that his right to a fair trial was impeded. Should have protected jury from publicity

DUE PROCESS OF LAW Habeas Corpus Search and Seizure Counsel Trial by jury Protection against self-incrimination Right to face your accuser Right to obtain witnesses on your behalf

PROCEDURES must be used when one is accused of a crime guarantees 4, 5, 6, 8 amendments, article 1 section 9.

RIGHTS ACCUSED, SOCIETY

Competitive in nature with theory each side will bring relative facts to find truth

Limits on conduct of police officers and prosecutors

Defendant Pre-Trial Rights

Trial Rights

Miranda Rights

Videotaped Interrogations

Exclusionary Rule

Deny government authority TO MAKE general searches

Weeks vs US (1914)

Established exclusionary rule for federal case

A policy forbidding the admission of trial of illegally seized evidence

Mapp v. Ohio (1954)

Incorporation exclusionary rule to states

5th amendment states that no person compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself

Criminals cannot be required to take witness stand in their own trial answer both attorneys or none

TERRY FRISk

CIVIL RIGHTS

Protect certain groups against discrimination

Claims are raised when a group is denied access to facilities opportunities or services available to other groups

The issue is whether differences in treatment are reasonable

LEGAL PROCESS REGARDING DISCRIMINATION

age

Suspect Classifications: PROTECTED CLASS

Classifications of people on the basis of their race, ethnicity, religion subject to strict scrutiny----------more investigating, high bar

gender, wealth, disability, sexual orientation are not subject to rational basis

Forms of discrimination/segregation-

De jure (by law) much dismantled by Civil Rights legislation and court decisions

De Facto (by fact) segregation that occurs not as a result of law but as a result of residence; hard to dismantle

TO BECOME CITIZEN-2 ways

Jus sanguinis-being born to parents who are us citizens

Jus soli-being born in the us or a us territory

Immigrants can become citizens through naturalization

Enriches lives and creativity in society

Challenges of diversity

Prejudice, discrimination

Strict scrutiny test –race, religion, protected classes

heightened scrutiny –gender

CIVIL RIGHTS

Suffrage-

15 voting rights to African Americans, other minorities

19 voting rights to women

24 prohibited poll taxes

26 voting rights granted at 18

13 prohibited slavery

CIVIL rights act of 1964-prohibited discrimination based on race color religion national origin—stopping segregation and discrimination in public accommodations forbid employer minority discrimination

VOTING rights act 1965-ended literacy tests successful

Both attorney general help and intervene on behalf of minorities and those discriminated against

HOW TO START TO INTEGRATE

Swann v Charlotte Mecklenburg(1971) remedies may include racial quotas, redrawn district lines and court ordered busing

Inter city busing only if both city and suburbs had practiced segregation

Busing remains controversial

Sexual harassment

Quid prop quo: sexual favors are required as a condition for holding a job or for promotion; employers are strictly liable

Hostile environment: creating a setting in which harassment impairs a person's ability to work; employers are liable if they are negligent

Privacy and sex

Regulating sexual matters is traditionally a state function under the exercise of the police powers

In 1965(Griswold v. Connecticut) Supreme Court held that states could not prevent the sale of contraceptives, because that violated the zone of privacy

Roe v. Wade beginning- first trimester allowed, after states can make laws-freedom to choose 14th amendment

Webster 1989 Court upheld some restrictions on abortion

Casey decision 1992 does not overturn Roe but permits more restrictions : 24-hour wait, parental consent, pamphlets about alternatives

Title ix women athletics if men athletics high schools and colleges have to have both or none

Discriminatory laws "protecting" them

OTHER CIVIL RIGHTS ISSUES

Japanese Americans ww2

Mexican Americans 1940s segregation of schools

Chinese/Chinese Americans – Chinese exclusion act 1882

Native Americans-continued violence and targeting

Sexual conduct usually regulated by states but some laws struck down 4th amendment

Some rulings upheld rights of organization to exclude gays

Due Process 14th amendment right to marry applies to same sex as opposite sex

Americans with Disabilities act

1986 Georgia allowed to ban homosexual sexual activity

1996 Colorado votes illegal to protect persons based on glb orientation court overturns

2003 court overturns Texas law banning sexual conduct between persons of the same sex

2013 gay marriages ban unconstitutional under 5th and 14th amendments per article 4 all marriages must be recognized in all 50 states

Affirmative action: programs designed to increase minority participation in some institutions (businesses, schools, labor unions, or government agencies) by taking positive steps to appoint more minority group members

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITYY OF CALIFORNIA v. BAKKE(1978)

Numerical minority quotas are not permissible, but race can be considered

Proposition 16 was a constitutional amendment that would have repealed prop209 passed in 1996 from the California constitution. Prop 209 stated discrimination and preferential treatment were prohibited in public employment, public education, and public contracting on account of a person's or group's race,

his measure would eliminate state and local government affirmative action programs in the areas of public employment, public education, and public contracting to the extent these programs involve "preferential treatment" based on race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin. The specific programs affected by the measure, however, would depend on such factors as (1) court rulings on what types of activities are considered "preferential treatment" and (2) whether federal law requires the continuation of certain programs.

The measure provides exceptions to the ban on preferential treatment when necessary for any of the following reasons:

To keep the state or local governments eligible to receive money from the federal government.

To comply with a court order in force as of the effective date of this measure (the day after the election).

To comply with federal law or the United States Constitution.

Adarand Constructors v. Pena 1995 strict scrutiny for racial classification

RULE OF LAW AND LIMITED GOVERNMENT

Rule of law-no one is above the law including public officials

Citizens and officials abide by law equally, Fair trials

Limited govt- human being inherent rights govt can take, checks and balances-constitution, federalism, bill of rights

Political socialization-experiences and factors that shape an individual's political values, attitudes, and behaviors

Political ideology-an individual's coherent set of beliefs about government and politics

Family's political beliefs usually party identification biggest impact-source of political information

Education transmits norms, teach American civics, introduce students to political participation and volunteering, civic and religious organizations as well, college students and graduates tend to be more liberal in part to ideas and movements encountered there

Race, ethnicity, socioeconomic standing

Religion connected with family: Catholics more liberal econ than protestants, Jewish more liberal on econ and social issues than other conservative religions

Gender depending on time=since 60s men trend to vote more republican while women tend to vote making up more than half of Democratic Party membership, can be correlated with issue stance

Generational- impact of historical events experienced by a generation

Life cycle-impact of person's age and stage in life

Millennials shaped by terrorism

Baby boomers shaped by Vietnam and Watergate Scandal

Younge8r people less politically engaged than older people

Conservative-to promote public good, government should be less involved in economic issues

Liberal-to promote public good, government should play more active role

Social class-job and income, unskilled and lower class tend more liberal on econ policy

Age-different ages different priorities

African Americans usually Democrat younger beginning to go to Republican social and econ

Whites usually Republican many college graduates Democrat

Most Latinos Democrat except Cubans on econ more Republican on social

Asian Americans trend more Republican than even whites in 90s however majority for Obama 2008

East and West coast tend more liberal, South west Midwest (inland) more conservative

Public opinion: collective opinion of large numbers of people-represents the voice of thew majority of the people in the country-important factor in political process/government in a republic because public officials look to what a majority of people want for policy-However can be hard to define or predict despite background or historical political socialization for groups'

Ways of political participation opinions-voting, speaking or writing about political issues(blogging), polling/surveys, demonstrations, joining interest groups

The Masses-"mainstream" America-often do not focus large amounts of tiime on politics and government, can change political opinions given outside pressures(e.g. schooling, changes in income/economy, domestic and international events, media)

The eliites-defined as people who have a disproportionate amount of valued resource, whether it be money, schooliing, prestige, political power, etc.

Tend to know more as well as think differently about policitcs than mainstream, tend to have consistent opinions on politics and government

Measured through polling surveying the population on an issue

Polls are fairly reliable due to george gallup's scientific methods developed in the 1930s

In-person interviews, telephone interviews, online surveys, mail questionnaires

Exit poll(2000 unreliable) fraction of voters

Sampling participants must be random there is uncertainty sampling error

Question wording and order bias in wording and order of question can affect results and opinions

Timing as more info can given on issue or candidate can change opinions

GLOBALIZATION-increasing interconnectedness of people, businesses, cultures, and countries throughout the world

Blurs lines between international and domestic politics

Multipolar world-America is no longer the only superpower, China-global economic power has built up military strength, Russia-aggressively asserts its own interests in Europe, European union-global economic; lots of cultural influence

Besides countries- multinational corporations-companies that make transport and market goods and services in two or more countries, Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) -independent groups outside of the government that work toward a public cause, Intergovernmental organizations(IGOs)-challenge sovereignty of countries, European Union, World Trade Organization, World Health Organization

Free trade-North American Free Trade Agreement US, Canada, Mexico----Trans-Pacific Partnership

Globalization can encourage democratization

EXPLOITATION-Outsourcing, occurs when a company moves its businesses to a place where labor costs are cheaper of production is more efficient because workers work longer hours----results in loss of jobs domestically----may lower environmental and labor standards in foreign countries---race to the bottom-----weakens traditional cultures----connects people/groups with negative and dangerous intentions

Probably good for tests

DungeonLifecreators' thoughts