_Arthas_

Basic human needs, such as clothing, food, security, and entertainment, are extremely profitable. Therefore, the main interest of capitalism is human well-being and prosperity, seeking the best cost-benefit ratio as long as one produces enough value to acquire these benefits. Other market systems, such as communism and socialism, have failed to replicate this model due to a series of factors and design flaws. For example, these systems theoretically aim to give power to the productive base by maximizing their rights and needs. However, because they are hierarchical, a leader defines what is considered good for the workers. This phenomenon of personal distancing, where leaders are so far removed from the masses, leads to priorities that are not sufficiently satisfactory, generating discontent and, eventually, threats to power. This can result in repression and ultimately a dictatorship that limits freedoms. Being at the critical point of these governments' interests can be devastating, as evidenced by the tragedy of the Holodomor, a result of Stalin's policies. I am not judging these systems, merely highlighting facts about their implementations to date. The community's well-being is the primary interest of capitalism because it maximizes profits. In contrast, more social systems, like socialism and communism, prioritize the maintenance and continuity of political ideology. Ultimately, debating which system is better is irrelevant; power is what defines quality of life. Regardless of the ideological system, a minority holds the power. If you are born the child of a dictator, you will have a higher quality of life than an ordinary citizen. Similarly, children of entrepreneurs will have a better quality of life than the working base, just as princes will have more privileges than peasants, and so on. I prefer capitalism for its ability to negotiate value, which allows for upward mobility in the hierarchy if you offer something considered valuable. Other systems are not as flexible in this regard.

" Ya, The plan. Lyon get them!"

Yes. But this Premiun game stores give easy things nowdays.

I thought a lot about what kind Dumbledoor actor I would like to portray. The official Dumbledore isn't exactly any defined type, I mean superficially tending to believe that he is a kind old man. But his actions towards Harry, and throughout the book, make this kind line quite questionable. The version of him that I decided on wouldn't interpret either good or bad. He will be an extremist idealist.

There some fan theory, that says hermione was an werewolf girl. And they can push detais for this theory looks solid.

Ya... Poor kid, just lost his parent. And this Crazy lady just offer tea?

you never know what adolencents girls do with sticks in an florest!

Hey, that sounds like a really interesting idea! I think you should try writing that story. There are two common types of fanfics: AU (Alternate Universe), where you manipulate the world and characters to tell a new story, and rewrites, where you change small elements like having Harry date Hermione and adjust the story for that romance to work, or have Harry go to Slytherin and rewrite the story based on the consequences of that decision. AUs are much harder to pull off but also more rewarding. Your idea seems to fit well into an AU. Connecting the worlds of Oz and Harry Potter sounds awesome! I think it's cool to have Theodora, the Wicked Witch, as a professor, and her child as the new MC.

This is a secret. Vincent dont know about this yet!

Omg. ITs in portuguese. Leme fix.