The ending of 'The Birds' is both mysterious and thought - provoking. After the intense and harrowing experiences of being attacked by the birds, Melanie, Mitch, and the others are able to get into a car and start to drive away. The birds that were once so aggressive have become quiet. Hitchcock deliberately left this ending open - ended. It could be that the birds' aggression was a short - lived phenomenon, or it could be that they were simply following some instinctual pattern that had run its course. This ending also serves to heighten the sense of dread and the unknown. We are left with the characters, and by extension, the audience, still in a state of fear and uncertainty as they leave the scene of the attacks, not knowing if the birds could resume their attacks at any time in the future.
In the ending of 'The Birds', the characters are on edge as they make their escape. The fact that the birds stop attacking is very strange. Maybe it was related to the time of day or some other factor that we're not aware of. Melanie, Mitch, and the family are all in the car, and the mood is tense. They don't know if the birds will start up again. Hitchcock often liked to leave his endings open to interpretation. Here, it could be that the birds were just a force of nature that had a short - lived outburst of aggression. As they drive away, we can see the fear still in their eyes, and it makes us wonder about the power dynamics between humans and nature. It's a simple yet powerful ending that has made the movie so memorable.
Well, the story ending of The Keeping Hours is explained through a series of events and revelations. It involves the characters making important decisions and facing the consequences of their actions, ultimately leading to a conclusion that reflects on themes of love, redemption, and moving on.
Writing the ending of a novel did not necessarily require the ending of all the characters. It depended on the plot and theme of the novel. Some novels may choose to end the story at the climax to show the fate and final ending of the characters, while others may focus more on exploring the inner world and relationships of the characters, thus providing more details and background information at the end.
Whether or not to tell the ending of all the characters also depended on the author's personal preference and writing style. Some authors may try to make the ending and actions of the characters as reasonable and complete as possible to strengthen the logic and cohesion of the novel, while others may choose to leave out some details to better convey the theme and emotion of the novel.
Whether or not to explain the ending of all the characters should be decided according to the plot and theme of the novel. If the author wants the readers to better understand the theme and emotions of the novel, they may need to provide more information and details in the ending.
"Deception" was the wrong word. The correct word should be "tireless in teaching". This idiom means to be willing to teach others without feeling tired. It originated from the Analects of Confucius. Confucius emphasized the importance of never getting tired of learning and teaching. This idiom is used to describe the very noble qualities of a teacher or tutor.
While waiting for the anime, you can also click on the link below to read the classic original work of " Full-time Expert "!
Deception's explanation was that a person was very bad, always destroying other people's good deeds or doing things that were harmful to others, putting others in a difficult situation. This word was a pejoling term. It was usually used by others to scold others to express their dislike for this person.
While waiting for the anime, you can also click on the link below to read the classic original work of " Full-time Expert "!