gits sac

The Gits anime movie is noticeably distinct from the manga. It might reimagine certain scenes, tweak character motivations, or introduce new elements that weren't in the original manga. But that doesn't mean one is better than the other; it just offers a different take.

One success story could be that after proper medical evaluation and follow - up, the initial appearance of an empty sac at 6 weeks turned out to be a miscalculation of the gestational age. The woman's period was irregular, and with further monitoring, a healthy embryo was detected a bit later. She then had a normal pregnancy and gave birth to a healthy baby.

One success story could be that it was initially a misdiagnosis. Sometimes the equipment or the angle of the scan might not be perfect at 5 weeks. In some cases, a week or two later, a clear gestational sac and a healthy embryo were detected. Another instance could be that the mother had some hormonal imbalances that made it seem like there was no sac at 5 weeks, but with proper treatment and rest, the pregnancy progressed well.

Yes. There are. A friend of mine was in a similar situation. At 5 weeks, the scan showed no sac. But she was patient and followed her doctor's advice. A week later, there was a sac and a healthy fetal pole. It just took a bit more time for things to show up. So, it is possible to have a normal pregnancy even when there's no sac at 5 weeks initially.

Simple. It could be just a matter of time. The gestational sac might not be visible early but develop later. So, don't panic right away.

One success story could be that sometimes the initial scan at 6 weeks might be inaccurate. Maybe the dating was off by a few days. In some cases, the gestational sac just wasn't visible yet but showed up a week or so later. For example, my friend had a similar situation. She was really worried at 6 weeks when no gestational sac was seen. But she waited and had another scan, and there it was, healthy and normal. It can be a matter of waiting and having a follow - up scan to get accurate results.

One reason for a positive outcome could be that the first scan was inaccurate. Later scans often show the yolk sac when it has had more time to develop. For example, I know a woman who was told there was no yolk sac at 6 weeks. She was worried sick, but at 7 weeks, there it was. So don't lose hope right away.

Yes, there are success stories. It might be that the dating of the pregnancy was off slightly. Maybe it was actually a bit earlier than thought, and the yolk sac hadn't developed enough to be visible at what was thought to be 6 weeks. Another possibility is that the equipment used for the ultrasound wasn't sensitive enough. In any case, with proper monitoring, some of these pregnancies went on successfully.

I know a woman who had no visible yolk sac at 6 weeks. She was really worried at first. But her doctor told her to wait and have another scan in a week or two. Turns out, the yolk sac was there in the next scan and she had a normal pregnancy. Sometimes, it just takes a little more time for the development to be visible.

There are quite a few success stories. The absence of a gestational sac at 5 weeks might be due to different factors like the method of detection. Ultrasound might not be able to pick it up that early. I knew someone who had no sac seen at 5 weeks. She had some mild spotting which worried her. But after proper rest and waiting for a while, a healthy gestational sac was detected later, and she had a normal pregnancy.