Well, his fiction typically combines historical research with elements of the unknown. He'll take real historical events and locations and then add in speculative elements like lost civilizations or advanced ancient technologies. Another aspect is that his writing often challenges the mainstream understanding of history, making the reader question what they thought they knew. And also, there's a sense of adventure in his stories, as characters go on quests to uncover these hidden truths.
Some of Graham Hancock's books can be seen as fiction. He has a tendency to create elaborate narratives that combine different historical and cultural elements in a rather creative way. His ideas about pre - historic civilizations and their possible advanced knowledge, for instance, are not based on conclusive evidence. He takes fragments of information and builds up stories around them. While his books can be very engaging and thought - provoking, they do not always adhere to the strict standards of historical or scientific non - fiction.
I'm not entirely sure if it's a completely new genre. While Graham Hancock's works have unique elements like blurring the lines between fact and fiction in historical contexts, there are some precedents in literature that also play with historical speculation. However, his popularity has perhaps brought more attention to this type of writing that combines mystery and historical re - interpretation in a fictional - like way.
Graham Hancock has written 'Keeper of Genesis'. This book combines elements of mystery, history, and speculation in a fictional framework. It's really engaging as it takes readers on a journey through different historical and archaeological concepts, presented in a fictional narrative that makes it easier to digest.
One characteristic is his use of mystery. His fictional books often start with some unexplained archaeological finding or historical mystery that he then tries to solve through his narrative.
Not all of Graham Hancock's work is pure 'fantastic fiction'. While some of his ideas are highly speculative and border on the extraordinary, he also presents ideas that are based on research, albeit controversial research. For example, his ideas about ancient civilizations and their possible advanced knowledge. However, many in the scientific community dismiss some of his claims as lacking solid evidence, which might lead some to categorize parts of his work as 'fantastic fiction'.
Another good one is 'Keeper of Genesis'. It combines historical research with fictional elements. The way it tells the story about certain ancient secrets and their significance is really captivating.
Some consider Graham Hancock's work as fantastic fiction because he often proposes ideas that go against mainstream scientific beliefs. For example, his theories about lost ancient civilizations with highly advanced technology that left little to no trace in the archaeological record. These ideas seem far - fetched to those who adhere strictly to traditional archaeological and historical research methods.
There were obvious differences between the Mayan pyramids and the Egyptian pyramids in terms of appearance, usage, and construction methods. First of all, the Mayan pyramids had a ladder-like appearance. Each side was ladder-shaped, and the top was a platform with a temple or altar built on it. On the other hand, the Egyptian pyramids were square-shaped with a pointed tip. At the top was a pointed cone or a small platform. Secondly, the Mayan pyramids were mainly used for religious sacrifices or astronomical observations. They used the position and shape of the pyramids to observe the laws of the sun, moon, stars, and other celestial bodies, and compiled accurate calendar and astronomy. The pyramids of Egypt were mainly used for the tombs of the Pharaohs or nobles. They built luxurious chambers and buried a large number of belongings and followers. In addition, the Mayan pyramids were built differently from the Egyptian pyramids. The Mayan pyramid was made of huge rocks and stone slabs. Its structure was more complicated, with many levels and passages. The Egyptian pyramids were made of huge stones and had a relatively simple structure. Therefore, there were obvious differences between the Mayan pyramids and the Egyptian pyramids in terms of appearance, use, and construction methods.
The Mayan pyramids and temples were important buildings in the Mayan civilization. The Mayan pyramids and temples had many unique features. First of all, Mayan pyramid temples were usually built on top of pyramids. The base was square with 91 steps on each side. Including the top floor, there were 365 steps, symbolizing the number of days in a year. In addition, there were 52 embossed on each side of the pyramid, representing the first century of Maya. The Mayan pyramid temples also had many statues and statues, such as the Feathered Serpent God and the Chakmore God. Among them, the Castillo Pyramid was one of the most famous Mayan pyramid temples. It was known as the last and greatest temple of Mayan culture. However, the search results did not provide clear information about the specific purpose and use of the Mayan pyramid temple.