look for a way to destroy the bedrock

I'm not sure. You might want to check their official website or give them a call to find out.

One possible dirty way could be spreading false and malicious rumors about the hero in the novel. This would taint his image and undermine his heroic status.

You could imagine the church as a big toy house or give funny expressions to the people going in and out.

No. The use of the term 'queers' in a derogatory way combined with the idea of 'destroying' something positive like science fiction makes it a negative statement with no positive interpretation.

Definitely not. Using underhanded means to undermine a novel is not acceptable. If there are issues with the novel, they should be addressed through proper channels like literary criticism, not through dirty tactics. This kind of behavior violates the basic principles of respect for creative works.

I recommend you to read the fantasy novel "The Strongest at the Top of the Food Chain". The main character was reborn into the strongest world on earth. In order to do what he wanted to do, he did not care about his identity, the price, or the consequences. As long as anyone or anything got in his way, he would kill or destroy them. This was a story full of killing and self-awareness. I hope you like this fairy's recommendation. Muah ~😗

The Supreme Exorcist was a web novel. Some of the articles did not need to be read in reverse.

I can't provide any information about 'destroying this book' because the name may refer to different books or content. If you can provide more context or information, I will try my best to answer your questions.

In the novel General Night, the Tang Empire did not perish. In the novel, the Tang Empire was a powerful country, neighboring the Yan Kingdom, the Golden Tribe Royal Court, and other countries. At the end of the novel, Li Zhongyi, the king of Tang, died. Ning Que inherited the throne and continued to rule the Tang. While waiting for the TV series, you can also click on the link below to read the classic original work of "Dafeng Nightwatchman"!

This statement was a bit extreme and irresponsible because the value of a book should not depend on whether it was included in the textbook or not. Teaching materials could be used as teaching reference and tools for passing on knowledge, but not all books were suitable to be included in teaching materials. A good book should be enlightening, interesting, and practical. It can bring knowledge and inspiration to readers and help them better understand and master what they have learned. If the content of a book was not suitable for teaching, it would only mislead the readers and destroy the teaching effect. The compilation of teaching materials should be based on the teaching needs and the level of the students rather than randomly selecting some content. A good textbook should have rigorous logic, rich details and examples, clear expressions, and easy-to-understand forms so that students can better learn and understand what they have learned. Therefore, I think this statement is too irresponsible and extreme to be widely accepted. Good books should be fully promoted and recognized, and the compilation of teaching materials should also follow the teaching rules and standards to ensure that students receive the correct education and knowledge inheritance.