arguments based on story

A clear plot is key. It should have a beginning, middle and end. For example, in a story for an argument about friendship, it could start with two people meeting, then a conflict in their relationship, and finally their reconciliation.

One way is to make the story relatable. For example, if you're debating about environmental protection, you can tell a story about a small town that was severely affected by pollution. This draws the audience in and makes them more likely to understand your point.

It makes you more relatable. When you share a personal story, the audience can see you as a real person with real experiences, not just someone spouting facts.

Well, in a debate, you can start by clearly stating the key point of your personal story. For example, if you're arguing about the importance of perseverance, you can share a time when you overcame a difficult task through perseverance. Then, connect the emotions and experiences from that story to the broader point in the debate. Make it relatable to the audience.

1. True friendship had nothing to do with interests. Once interests were involved, friendship would lose its soul and become a transaction. Only friendship that had nothing to do with interests was pure. 2. Friendship was a wonderful nutrient that could make young people more beautiful and old people more youthful. It had a positive impact on different age groups. 3. There were many kinds of happiness in life, and friendship was a very important one. In the hardships of life, it was very painful to not have a confidant, which showed the importance of friendship to life. 4. True friendships would become more noble, pure, and firm after going through hardships, while false friendships would quickly disintegrate in the face of hardships. Through trials, one could distinguish between true and false friendships. 5. The friendship that was obtained in the times of wealth and pride in life needed to be tested by poverty and frustration. Only those who could withstand the test were true friendships. 6. True friendship had nothing to do with wealth, power, status, gender, or age. It was a pure emotional connection. 7. Friendship was like a growing plant that needed careful care and watering. Otherwise, it would gradually wither or even die, which meant that friendship needed to be carefully managed by both parties. 8. When a person had no power, was sick, and had no value, a true friend would still care and greet him. This reflected the essence of true friendship. 9. The touchstone of friendship was not to cling to others. Only those who did not flatter their friends and did not seek personal gain could become friends for life. 10. Friendship did not need pity or special treatment. It needed two equal hearts to exchange with each other. A friendship built on the basis of equality was stable. The story of one person and a group of people is equally exciting. Everyone is welcome to click and read it!

Make the arguments logical and based on solid reasoning. Use clear language and build up to a climax to keep the readers engaged.

The arguments and arguments for "excellence" were as follows: Point of view: The pursuit of excellence is a spirit that allows people to continuously improve and improve their ability to achieve greater success. Evidence: People who strive for perfection are often able to constantly challenge their own limits, constantly learn and grow. They can constantly break through their bottlenecks and achieve greater achievements in their careers. People who strive for perfection usually have high self-requirements and self-management skills. They can constantly reflect on and improve their own methods and strategies to continuously improve their abilities and standards. People who strive for perfection are often able to deal with various challenges and difficulties well. They can remain calm and calm in the face of difficulties and take effective measures to solve problems. Perfection is a spirit of pursuing excellence. It can make people constantly improve and improve their ability to achieve greater success.

Quoting arguments, figurative arguments, contrasting arguments, and examples were all used to strengthen the effectiveness of arguments. Here are a few examples: Citation: No one can be truly free unless he is brave enough to face his own soul. - Maugham, The Moon and Sixpence In this novel, the author Maugham used this sentence to emphasize that people must face their own souls in order to obtain true freedom. Metaphorical argument: He was like a shooting star that streaked across the night sky and quietly disappeared with endless light. - Lu Yao's Ordinary World In this novel, the author Lu Yao used the metaphor of " shooting star " to emphasize the protagonist Sun Shaoping's short but glorious life. Comparisons: He was like a lonely wolf wandering in the vast wilderness, looking for his own home. - Márquez, One Hundred Years of Solitude In this novel, the author Márquez used the word "wolf" to compare the protagonist, José Alcadeo Garcia Márquez, emphasizing his process of seeking his own home in loneliness. Illustration: Without sufficient sleep, your soul will not be nourished. - Maugham, The Moon and Sixpence In this novel, the author Maugham used an example to show that if a person did not have enough sleep, he would not be able to have a healthy soul.

The following is a paragraph that uses cited arguments, figurative arguments, and contrasting arguments: Citation: Although the saying " human nature is good " came from the Confucian classic " Mencius ", people in modern society generally believed that human nature was evil. Even so, this statement is still very convincing because it draws on this view from the original Confucianists and highlights the essence of human nature through the concept of "human nature" in contrast to "evil." Metaphorical argument: " Human nature is good " could be illustrated with an example. For example, the human brain stored a large amount of information like a computer screen. But the computer screen allows people to see everything easily, but the human brain has a hard time processing this information. Therefore, by comparing the brain to the computer screen, the idea of "human nature is good" emphasized the wisdom and potential of humans. Comparisons: The saying that human nature is good can be compared with the view that human nature is evil.

The argument that open-book reading was useless was that reading books and other materials would only lead to negative effects rather than positive effects on the acquisition of knowledge, so open-book reading should be avoided in the learning process. This kind of argument usually appeared in some educational or inspirational novels to motivate readers to pay more attention to the efficiency and quality of learning. However, it should be noted that this view may not apply to all situations. Reading books and other materials can be a very beneficial way of learning in certain situations, such as when exploring a new field or when dealing with exams and interviews. In this case, a suitable opening speech could emphasize the benefits of reading books and other materials for the acquisition of knowledge and improvement of skills. Therefore, both education and inspirational novels should avoid extreme views and emphasize the benefits and negative effects of reading books and other materials appropriately.