I'm not sure. It could be inspired by real-life situations but might not be a direct retelling of a specific true story. Maybe it's a fictional creation with elements that feel real.
It could be because of the potential harm it might cause. If the true story involves someone's mistakes or bad deeds, and telling it could damage that person's life further, then no one would be likely to tell it. Another reason could be that the story is part of a closed community's experience, and they don't want outsiders to know about it to maintain their exclusivity.
Well, in some cases, a true story might be so complex or disturbing that no one feels comfortable telling it. For example, if it involves a tragic event that affected a lot of people in a negative way. People might not want to relive the pain or cause more distress by sharing it. Also, there could be legal implications that prevent people from telling a true story. If there are ongoing investigations or legal battles related to the events in the story, it's likely that no one would risk getting in trouble by telling it.
One reason could be fear. If the true story involves something dangerous or illegal, people might be afraid of getting into trouble. For example, if it's about a crime they witnessed but the criminals are still at large and dangerous. Another reason could be loyalty. Maybe they are loyal to someone involved in the story and don't want to betray them. Also, it could be shame. If the true story reflects poorly on themselves or their family, they would rather keep it to themselves.
Maybe the true story in 1996 is too painful or embarrassing for people to share. It could involve personal secrets, family issues, or some events that are difficult to face up to.
No, it's not based on real events. The story was created by the filmmakers to entertain the audience. It might draw inspiration from common themes and situations, but it's not a true account of something that happened in real life.
It could be that there's some sort of pressure or threat preventing them from sharing the truth. Or perhaps they themselves don't fully understand the whole story.
One way is to look at the source. If it comes from reliable historical records or first - hand accounts, it's likely a true story. If it's a work of fiction that claims to be 'based on a true story', it might mention some liberties taken in the preface or introduction. For example, a novel might say 'inspired by the events in a small town in the 1950s, but with fictional characters and added plotlines'.