How about 'The story of when the wife is gone, and a forceful element (the bull) causes the husband to be in a tough spot (implied by suck).' This tries to make more sense of the original odd phrase while still keeping the basic ideas it might be trying to convey.
This kind of question assumes an unhealthy dynamic. A wife's actions in a relationship are based on love, connection, and her own comfort, not an obligation to perform such acts whenever the husband desires.
No. Such stories often involve inappropriate and disrespectful content towards others. A healthy relationship should be based on respect, love and equality, and indulging in this kind of content violates the basic principles of a good relationship.
It's not ethical at all. Such stories often involve inappropriate and disrespectful content towards a relationship. A healthy relationship should be based on mutual respect, trust and positive interactions, not on demeaning or voyeuristic concepts.
This phrase is quite puzzling. It might be a story that involves the wife leaving and then some situation arising for the husband that is symbolized by the 'bull' and whatever the'suck' part is supposed to mean. It could also be a misphrasing of something else. If it's from a specific region or community, they might have their own understanding of these words in relation to a story, but from a general perspective, it's very difficult to say precisely what it means.
It is highly abnormal. Marriage is a union based on mutual understanding, trust, and respect. Any form of request that involves such inappropriate and non - consensual behavior is a sign of a very troubled relationship. In a normal marriage, partners should communicate about positive, healthy, and respectful things, not engage in or demand actions that are clearly against social and moral norms.