It's a tale of destiny and courage. Arthur pulled the magical sword, Excalibur, from the stone, which was seen as a sign that he was the rightful king.
Well, Arthur's becoming king was a combination of factors. First, there was the pulling of the sword from the stone, which was a magical event that set him apart. Also, his noble character and leadership skills made him worthy of the crown.
The question of whether King Arthur is a true story is a complex one. While there are no definitive historical records that prove his existence in the exact form that the legends present him, there are elements that suggest a kernel of truth. There were likely Celtic chieftains or leaders in the Dark Ages around which the Arthurian tales grew. The idea of a great leader who fought against invaders and brought unity could have been based on real individuals or events that were then embellished over centuries.
It's a matter of debate. Some believe there might be some elements of truth in the King Arthur story, but it's likely highly embellished and fictionalized over time.
It's hard to say for sure. Some elements of the King Arthur story might have roots in history, but it's likely that a lot of it was embellished and fictionalized over time.
Most historians believe that King Arthur is more of a myth or legend than a strictly true story. But some elements might be based on real events or figures that have been exaggerated and romanticized over time.
The story of King Arthur is considered fictional. Although it may draw inspiration from some historical events or figures, it's embellished and transformed into a rich narrative that's not based on solid historical facts.