I haven't heard that '30 Rock' is based on a novel. But in general, it's not hard to watch at all. The show has a unique sense of humor, interesting storylines, and talented actors. It's a show that can make you laugh out loud and keep you entertained throughout each episode.
Maybe it's because the movie fails to capture the essence of the novel. For example, if the novel has complex characters and the movie simplifies them too much, it can be hard to watch.
I don't really think there's much that would make it hard to watch. But perhaps if the adaptation from the novel was really bad, like if they left out important parts of the story or changed the characters too much, it could be a bit off - putting. However, since I'm not sure it's actually based on a novel, this is just speculation.
One factor could be bad acting. Even if the story is great from the novel, if the actors can't bring the characters to life, it makes the movie hard to watch.
Yes, it is. The movie 'Die Hard' draws its inspiration from a novel. This origin gives the movie a rich backstory and well - developed characters. The novel likely had the basic plot elements like the hero being trapped in a difficult situation, which translated well onto the big screen.
Die Hard 2 was based on the novel '58 Minutes'. It's a story that likely had elements that the movie's creators found exciting and suitable for adaptation. For example, it might have had a similar high - stakes situation and a hero who has to overcome great odds in a time - sensitive scenario, much like the movie portrays.
Die Hard is based on the book 'Nothing Lasts Forever' by Roderick Thorp. It transformed the story from the page to the big screen, keeping the core concepts and action-packed elements intact.