Sure. Think about a mystery novel. At the end, all the pieces of the conflict come together. The detective might solve the crime, and through this resolution, the conflict between the criminal and the law is told. It's like the end is the grand finale where the conflict's full story gets wrapped up.
Well, the end of the conflict often means that the characters have overcome the obstacles or challenges. It could involve finding a solution, making a compromise, or achieving a goal that puts an end to the tension and strife.
It's extremely important. It gives a sense of closure to the story. Without a proper end to the central conflict, the story would feel unfinished and leave the readers or viewers frustrated.
Sometimes, it might involve a new beginning or the setup for a potential sequel. The characters could have learned valuable lessons and be ready for new challenges.
One way could be a resolution through communication. For example, in a story where two friends are in conflict over a misunderstanding, they finally sit down and talk it out, clearing the air and ending the conflict.
Well, a conflict with a friend can be classified as a relational story conflict. It often stems from misunderstandings, differences in opinions, or competing interests within the friendship.
No. While the end can give an idea of the conflict's outcome, without the preceding parts, it lacks the build - up and details. It would be like seeing only the last scene of a movie without knowing the plot leading up to it.
The brotherly conflict concludes when they have a heartfelt conversation and realize the importance of family. This leads to them resolving their issues and strengthening their bond.
Conflict in a story is basically a struggle or a problem. It can be between characters, like two people fighting over a treasure. It could also be a character against society, for example, a person trying to change an unjust law. Or it can be an internal conflict within a character, such as a hero struggling with his own fear.