new york times review less a novel

It could mean that according to the New York Times review, the work in question lacks certain elements that are typically associated with a novel. Maybe it doesn't have a complex plot, well - developed characters, or a traditional narrative structure. For example, it might be more like a collection of short stories or vignettes that don't quite come together as a cohesive novel.

A work can be 'less a novel' if it has a weak plot. For instance, if the story doesn't have a clear beginning, middle, and end, or if the events seem disjointed. Novels usually have a certain flow to the plot that keeps the reader interested. If that's lacking, it can be considered less of a novel.

The New York Times often has in - depth reviews of historical fiction. These reviews can be a great resource for readers. They might discuss how well the author has re - created a particular historical period, whether the characters seem believable within that context, and the overall quality of the writing. For example, a review might praise a book for its meticulous research into a little - known historical event and how it weaves that into an engaging story.

I'm not entirely sure about the exact selection process. But it probably depends on the relevance and importance of the topics. Maybe they choose stories that are of high interest to a wide range of readers, like reviews of blockbuster movies or best - selling books.

Popularity among early readers and the buzz in the literary community can play a role. If a novel is generating a lot of talk on social media or among booksellers, The New York Times might choose to review it to add to the conversation.

Well, generally, the NYT review of 'A Ghost Story' could be centered around its artistic merit. It could have praised the film for its minimalist approach. The use of long, static shots to build tension and a feeling of melancholy might have been commended. The movie's exploration of time, loss, and love in a very subdued and thought - provoking manner could also be a key part of the review. Maybe they also compared it to other films in the genre, highlighting what makes 'A Ghost Story' unique.

They probably look at the popularity of the book among readers. If a lot of people are talking about a particular novel, it might catch their attention.

The New York Times likely reviews Japanese novels based on various aspects. For example, they might consider the originality of the story. If a novel presents a unique concept or a fresh take on a common theme, it would be noted. For instance, a Japanese novel that combines traditional Japanese cultural elements with modern storytelling techniques might get a positive review.

The New York Times often provides in-depth and critical reviews of Trump stories, focusing on various aspects such as policy, actions, and statements.

Well, it could be a combination of factors. They might take into account the reputation of the author. If it's an established author with a following, their new book is likely to be considered. Also, books that are winning awards or getting a lot of pre - publication hype are probably more likely to be selected. They may also receive submissions from publishers, and then their editors decide which ones seem the most interesting and relevant to their readership. And perhaps they have a team that scouts for unique or under - the - radar books that deserve more attention.