Perhaps it means that this 'pulp fiction' is a subversion of the genre. It might not rely on the common tropes of pulp fiction like excessive violence for the sake of it, or cliched characters. Instead, it could be using the pulp fiction framework to tell a much more meaningful and intelligent story. It could also be that the quality of the writing, the depth of the ideas, or the overall artistic merit is much higher than what we expect from pulp fiction.
Sure. Pulp fiction is often associated with being fast - paced, action - filled, and not overly concerned with deep meaning. But if it 'isn't really pulp fiction', it might be that it defies these expectations. For instance, it could have a strong moral message or a complex exploration of human nature that is not typical of pulp. It might also be that the writing style is more refined, not the simple, straightforward style usually found in pulp.
The absence of Pulp Fiction could be because of a variety of factors. It could be that the rights to show it have expired, or it might not meet the content standards of the current provider. Also, changes in viewer demand or business decisions could play a role.
I'm not entirely sure if there are exactly 180 shots. It could be a rough estimate or some kind of symbolic number. The movie has a complex narrative structure and a lot of different scenes, so it's hard to say for sure without a detailed shot - by - shot analysis.
Well, in such a situation, all kinds of unexpected and sometimes wild things could happen. Maybe characters engage in activities they wouldn't do otherwise.