truer than fiction

Nonfiction is often considered truer as it's based on real events and facts. Fiction, on the other hand, is made up by the author's imagination.

Yes, it can be. Sometimes a story can convey a deeper or more universal truth than a simple account of actual events.

Sometimes, a story-truth is truer because it combines different elements and perspectives to reveal a deeper meaning that a simple happening-truth might miss. It can touch on universal themes and human emotions that resonate more strongly with people.

I think it's somewhat truer. They kept many key elements and storylines from the comics.

I don't think you can simply say non-fiction is better. Non-fiction can be informative, but fiction has the power to inspire and touch our hearts in unique ways. It really varies from person to person based on their interests and needs.

Non-fiction is better because it gives us accurate information and facts. We can use this to make informed decisions and gain a deeper understanding of the world around us. Fiction, on the other hand, is mostly for entertainment and might not have the same practical value.

Fiction offers escapism and takes you to imaginative worlds that aren't bound by reality. It can be more exciting and fun.

It's not a matter of one being better. Non-fiction enriches your understanding of facts and events, while fiction exercises your imagination and emotional connection. Both have their unique merits.

Fiction offers escapism and creativity. You can enter worlds that don't exist in reality and let your imagination run wild. Non-fiction is often bound by facts and can be a bit limiting in that sense.

Fiction offers escapism and imaginative experiences that non-fiction often can't. It allows us to explore new worlds and ideas without the constraints of reality.