There is no direct connection between Michael Caine and Pulp Fiction. Michael Caine is a well - known actor with his own body of work, while Pulp Fiction is a Quentin Tarantino movie that features its own set of actors. They exist in different cinematic universes, so to speak.
In 'Pulp Fiction', there is no character named 'Caine' that I'm aware of. It might be a misnomer or something very specific that isn't a major well - known element in the movie.
It's not clear which specific 'Caine' is being referred to here. It could be the character from 'Kung Fu' or some sort of made - up or less - known reference to a character in the world of 'Pulp Fiction' that has some connection to the idea of 'Caine' from 'Kung Fu'.
No. There is no connection between 'Caine' and the plot of 'Pulp Fiction' as the movie has its own set of characters and storylines that don't involve anyone named 'Caine'.
There is no direct connection between the character Caine from 'Kung Fu' and 'Pulp Fiction' as they are from different works. Caine in 'Kung Fu' is a martial artist who embarks on a journey of self - discovery. In 'Pulp Fiction', there is no character named Caine.
Definitely. Michael Madsen was featured in Pulp Fiction. His presence contributed to the unique and gritty atmosphere of the movie. The character he portrayed left a lasting impression on viewers.
No, it's not a common saying. It seems to be a creative combination of different cultural and movie references that someone has put together, rather than a phrase that you'd hear people use in everyday conversation.