Donald Trump was born into a wealthy family in New York City. His father, Fred Trump, was a successful real - estate developer. Trump attended the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. He entered the real - estate business early on and gradually built his own real - estate empire, with properties like Trump Tower. His business ventures also extended into other areas such as entertainment with shows like 'The Apprentice', which significantly increased his public profile and made him a well - known figure in the United States before he entered politics.
As far as I know, there's no such 'Trump - related shooter' situation that would have a back story. It's likely just a baseless rumor or a very unlikely scenario that hasn't occurred in reality.
It could also be related to Trump's view on the fight against terrorism. Saudi Arabia has been an important partner in this fight, at least in the narrative presented. Trump may believe that by backing their story, he is also showing support for their efforts in combating terrorism, which was one of his key policy areas during his tenure.
Trump's visit to El Paso was mainly for political reasons. He wanted to show his presence and influence in the area. He also aimed to address certain issues like border security which was a major topic at that time. Additionally, it was a chance for him to connect with his supporters in the region.
Trump comes from a wealthy real - estate family. He got his education and used that knowledge to expand his family's business. Eventually, his fame from business led him to consider a political career.
The back story involves Trump's political agenda. He saw El Paso as a place to promote his ideas on immigration. He wanted to show that his policies would work in a city that was affected by cross - border issues. He also aimed to boost his popularity among his supporters in the area.
The whistleblower situation regarding Trump was a complex and highly politicized event. It involved a person coming forward with concerns about certain actions or conversations. However, different political camps had different views on the credibility and motives of the whistleblower. Some believed it was a legitimate attempt to expose potential wrongdoings, while others thought it was a politically - motivated smear campaign.