can vs can't short story

The main difference between 'can' and 'can't' in a short story is about ability and impossibility. 'Can' shows that a character has the ability to do something. For example, 'He can run fast.' This tells the reader that the character has the physical or mental capacity to perform the action of running quickly. On the other hand, 'can't' indicates the lack of ability. Like 'She can't swim.' It gives a limitation to the character. In a short story, these words are crucial for character development as they help define what the characters can and cannot do, which in turn affects the plot and the story's progression.

In a 'can vs can't' short story, 'can' can drive the plot forward. If a character can fly, it can introduce all sorts of exciting elements. They could use this ability to rescue someone from a tall building or quickly reach a far - off place. 'Can't', on the other hand, can create obstacles. For example, if a character can't remember their past, it becomes a mystery that the story might revolve around. So, 'can' and 'can't' directly impact the plot by either facilitating action or creating barriers.

I don't quite understand your question. Can you provide more context or information so that I can better understand your question and provide you with a more accurate answer?

One great 'man vs self' short story is 'The Yellow Wallpaper' by Charlotte Perkins Gilman. It shows the internal struggle of the female protagonist dealing with her mental state while being confined. Another is 'To Build a Fire' by Jack London, where the man battles his own hubris and lack of proper judgment in the face of nature's harshness.

Sure. 'The Most Dangerous Game' is a great example. In this story, Rainsford, a big - game hunter, falls off a yacht and swims to an island. There he meets General Zaroff, who has grown bored with hunting animals and now hunts men. Rainsford has to use his wits and survival skills to outwit Zaroff in a deadly game of cat and mouse. This is a clear man - vs - man conflict as the two men are pitted against each other in a life - or - death struggle.

One way is through dialogue. For example, if two characters are arguing over a limited resource like in a post - apocalyptic story where they fight over the last can of food. Their words can show their different motives and values. Another way is through their actions towards each other. If one character tries to sabotage the other's efforts to win a competition, that shows the conflict clearly.

The short story 'The Open Boat' by Stephen Crane is also a great example. Four men are adrift in a small boat in the open sea. The vast and unrelenting ocean, representing nature, is constantly against them. The waves threaten to capsize the boat, and they face challenges like lack of food, water, and extreme fatigue. They battle the elements as they try to reach the shore. Despite their efforts, nature's power is overwhelming, and they are at the mercy of the sea, which shows the man - vs - nature conflict.

Sure. V.S. Pritchett has some wonderful short stories. 'The Fly in the Ointment' is one of his well - known works. It's a story that delves into family relationships and the little irritations that can grow into big problems over time. Another great one is 'The Saint', which explores themes of morality and self - discovery in a really engaging way.

In this short story, 'beggars can't be choosers' might imply that the characters in a difficult situation have to accept whatever they are given. They don't have the luxury to be picky. For example, if a person is starving and someone offers them food, they can't demand a specific type of meal. It shows the powerlessness and desperation of those in need.

Perhaps you're putting too much pressure on yourself. Just let your creativity flow and don't worry too much about making it perfect at first. Editing and improving come later.