pantyhose pornography

The idea of whether fictional pornography is a sin is complex. Different religions and moral frameworks have varying views. Some religions strictly prohibit any form of pornography, fictional or not, as it can still corrupt the mind and spirit. But in more liberal perspectives, it might not be considered a sin if it doesn't cause harm or violate ethical standards.

Yes, it is illegal. Writing a story involving child pornography is a serious crime as it contributes to the exploitation and harm of children.

Well, 'pantyhose fiction' might be a very niche or even self - defined term. It could be that some writers or groups use it to describe stories where pantyhose play a significant role. For example, it could be a type of detective story where a clue is left in the form of a torn pantyhose, or it could be a romance story where the female lead's choice of pantyhose is symbolic of her mood or character. However, this is all speculation without more information.

The 'Venom' comic should not have any content related to pornography or lewdness. Such elements are inappropriate and go against the standards of quality comics.

No, they don't. Laws against child pornography are focused on real-life situations involving actual children, not fictional characters.

The stories can be very diverse. Some might have been lured in by false promises, while others might have made the choice due to financial desperation.

Definitely not ethical. Stories like this are not only morally wrong but also illegal. They can cause immense damage to people's mental and emotional well-being.

In some of the stories, pantyhose might play a role in a fashion transformation. For example, a girl who was usually into casual wear decided to try a more sophisticated look with a skirt and pantyhose. It not only changed her appearance but also how she carried herself. The pantyhose added a touch of femininity that she hadn't explored before.