If one considered the Olympus lens from the perspective of travel convenience, a lens with an equivalent 35mm focal length was more practical for travel users. For example, the Olympus 171.8 lens had an equivalent focal length of 34mm for the full frame. The 1.8 aperture light was acceptable, and it was one of the few lenses that could be balanced on the Zhiyun M2 Stabilizer. It was suitable for scenes such as sweeping the streets at night. In addition, lenses starting from 24mm were also more suitable for viewing angles, such as Olympus '12 - 40 lens, which was equivalent to a full-frame 24 - 80 lens. It could meet a variety of needs in travel photography. There were also telephoto lenses such as the 751.8 M43 lens, which had an equivalent focal length of 150mm. Although the telephoto lens did not capture many pictures during the journey, it could bring a sense of space compression, which could be used to shoot portraits and scenery. In addition, the Olympus M. ZD150 - 400mm f4.5IS TC1.25x Pro lens could reach 0.7x when the built-in zoom lens was turned on, which was more suitable for macro shooting. It also had 7.5 level anti-shake for hand-held shooting. However, the combination of this lens and the EM1X camera looked larger and heavier, but it was actually lighter. Read more exciting novels for free
Olympus has a variety of lenses. Here is some information about them: - 12 - 40mm Pro f2.8 lens: released in 2013. At the end of 2021, the second-hand price was around 2500 yuan. It was 80% to 90% new. It had an all-metal body and a solid feel. The zoom ring and focus ring were just right, but it weighed 382g. Its image quality and sharpness performance was good. On the Olympus EM10 third-generation body, the 100% zooming of the auto show photo center in the daytime indoor environment had a better image quality. The sharpness in the outdoor environment was similar to the helmet 14 - 42, 40 - 150, but it had the advantage of a large aperture of f2.8, which could make up for the lack of high sensitivity of the M43 at night and in dim environments. The quality could still be played after 8 years, but the price was a little high. - M.ZUIKO DIGITAL 17mm f/1.8 wide-angle lens (fixed focus): Micro 4/3 mount, priced at 2899 yuan. - M.ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 7 - 14mm f/2.8 Pro wide-angle lens (zoom): has a corresponding mount. - [M. ZDED12 - 50/3.5 - 6.3EZ lens: Although it is a "dog head" lens, it has a wide focal length coverage, with macro and wide-angle lenses. It costs more than 700 yuan second-hand and is cost-effective.] <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
Here are some Olympus zoom lens recommendations: - Olympus 12 - 40mm Pro f2.8: This was the must-have lens in the M43 system, released in 2013. It was well-made and had an all-metal body. The zooming ring and focusing ring were just right, but it weighed 382g. In terms of image quality and sharpness, it still performed well on the Olympus EM10 third-generation body. During the day, the sharpness was better in indoor and outdoor environments with sufficient light, and at night and in dim environments, the large aperture of f2.8 could make up for the lack of high sensitivity of the M43 system. However, at the end of 2021, its price was still a little too high. - Olympus 150 - 400mm F4.5TC1.25x IS Pro: This lens has the longest equivalent focal length of 2000mm and the closest focusing distance of 1.3 meters. It covers 300 - 1000mm F4.5 - 5.6 focal lengths (including the focal length conversion factor of the M43 system 2x and the built-in 1.25x zoom lens). With the MC - 20 double zoom lens and the E-M1X body, it can achieve the equivalent of 2000mm F11 hand-held shooting. Its focusing speed was not slow, and with the camera's bird tracking function, it could better identify birds in complex environments. Whether it was shooting birds in the forest or other scenes, it was more practical. - Olympus M.ZUIKO Digital ED 40 - 150mm f/4 - 5.6R: It was a medium telephoto zoom lens that could be used for medium telephoto shooting needs. If the M43 was more portable, the 14 - 42 or 14 - 42 EZ electric zoom lens would be a better choice. Its sharpness and image quality were more conscientious. In addition, if you want to be portable and consider the price similar to the 12 - 40 Pro, you can try the 12 - 45 Pro. It is lighter and sharper, but the aperture is smaller. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
To a certain extent, the interface could indeed bring convenience to the purchase of lenses. For example, in the field of camera lenses, lenses with different bayonet couldn't be directly used on other bayonet cameras, but with the interface, such as the Nikon Z-mount camera could use the Fuji X-mount lens through a specific interface ring, and the Nikon F-mount lens could be used on the Sony-E-mount camera. This expanded the range of lens choices. The user did not have to be limited to the lens of the original bayonet of the camera. They could choose a variety of lenses according to their own needs, such as the optical quality of different brands of lenses, cost-performance ratio, etc. However, there may be some problems with the use of the interface, such as some functions may not be realized, or there may be some compatibility flaws in focusing, imaging, and so on. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
Here are some recommended lenses for Olympus cameras: - Olympus M.ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 17mm F1.2 Pro lens: It had the advantages of fast focus, good low light performance, excellent bokeh effect, and strong weather resistance, but it was large in size and weight, and expensive. - Olympus ZUIKO Digital 25mm F1.8 lens: The lens is small and lightweight. It can quickly focus in all kinds of light conditions and has good bokeh effects. However, the focusing speed is slightly inferior to the Olympus F1.4 lens. - Olympus M.Zuiko 25mm F1.2 Pro lens: It has excellent bokeh effects, can focus quickly, manual focus operation is smooth, and the lens is compact and light, but the price is high. - Olympus M.ZUIKO Digital 45mm F1.8 lens: The lens is small and light, the autofocus system and bokeh effect are excellent, the image is clear and sharp, and the price is relatively affordable. - Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm F1.2 Pro lens: Ultra-clear and sharp image, fast and precise focus, and good weather resistance. However, it was more expensive and heavier. - Olympus M. ZUICO DIGITAL ED 75mm F1.8 lens: The lens is made of all-metal material, the autofocus system is excellent, the image quality is perfect and the bokeh is beautiful, but the effect is not good when shooting in low light conditions. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
The following are some DSLR cameras suitable for travel: The Nikon D5600 single-lens reflex camera was an entry-level choice. It was equipped with an AF-S DK Nikkor 18 - 140mm zoom lens. Under the large zoom lens, close-up and telephoto shots could be easily handled. The aperture size was between F/3.5 - 5.6. It used a quiet wave motor, which made it very quiet when shooting. It could quickly focus and shoot with one button. The VR shock absorption technology could help beginners reduce the blurring caused by shaking when shooting, so that the user could take clear images at will. Its EXPED 4 processor could restore the details of the subject, and the 24.16 million effective resolution could capture wonderful details, making the photo appear more high-definition. The LED touch screen could be flipped, and the angle could be adjusted freely when shooting. It could be flipped up, down, left, and right, making it easy to capture different perspectives when shooting. In general, the Nikon D5600 had certain advantages in terms of shooting function, operation convenience, and image quality. It was suitable for travel photography. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
For Canon cameras, the following lenses are suitable for travel use: - APSC camera: - 15 - 85mm lens (equivalent focal length 24 - 136mm). - 18 - 135mm lens (equivalent focal length 29 - 216mm). - 18 - 200mm lens (equivalent to 29 - 320mm focal length). - Tenglong 16 - 300mm lens (equivalent to focal length 25.6 - 480mm). - 18 - 400mm lens (equivalent focal length 29 - 560mm). - 18 - 270mm lens (equivalent focal length 29 - 430mm). - Full-frame camera: - 24 - 105mm lens. - 28 - 300mm lens. - Sima 24 - 105mm lens. - Tenglong 28 - 300mm lens. - RF24 - 240mm F4 - 6.3 (Although the picture quality is average, it can satisfy the needs of a world-famous lens, weighing 750g). - RF24 - 105mmF2.8LIS USMZ (It was one of the best lenses for travel photography). - RF10 - 20mm F4L IS ATM (wide focal length, small size, light weight, and a new IS anti-shake component, suitable for travel, video, and other scenes). <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
There were many factors that needed to be considered for the camera lens that Guizhou tourists carried. If you want a versatile lens, a zoom lens with a wide focal length range (such as 24 - 70mm or 18 - 200mm) is a good choice. If one considered lightweight and compact lenses, fixed-focus lenses were usually smaller, lighter, and easier to carry. Moreover, fixed-focus lenses had the advantage of good image quality, low light performance, and affordable prices. They were suitable for travelers who wanted to shoot high-quality, creative shots but did not want to carry heavy and expensive equipment. From the perspective of meeting the needs of different scenes, if they went to Guizhou for travel shooting, it might involve natural scenery, cultural landscape and other scenes. For example, a wide-angle lens might be needed to shoot a landscape, and a telephoto lens might be needed to shoot a close-up or portrait. If the camera you carry is a Fuji camera, such as a trip to Guizhou that requires more hiking, such as XF10 - 24mm F4R OIS QR, XF16mm F1.4QR R, XF16 - 50mm F3.5 - 5.6OIS II, XF16 - 55mm F2.8R LM QR, XF16 - 80mm F4R OIS QR, XF18 - 120mm F4LM PZ QR, XF100 - 400mm F4.5 - 5.6R LM OIS W, XF150 - 600mm F5.6 - 8R LM OIS W and other lens combinations with different focal lengths can meet the needs of various scenes. In addition, considering that there may be low light or hand-held shooting in Guizhou, the lens with image stabilization function can reduce camera shake and image blurring. If the weather conditions are not good or the shooting environment is challenging, the sealed lens can protect the lens from moisture and dust. A large aperture (such as f/1.8 or f/2.8) lens allows more light to enter the lens in low light, and it can also create an attractive bokeh or isolate the subject. These factors can also be taken into account when choosing a lens. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
The super wide-angle lens had a multi-dimensional effect in tourism photography. In terms of composition elements, more elements could be included to make the picture more " comprehensive." This was more friendly to photographers who had composition choice confusion, but too many elements could lead to a messy picture and a lack of focus. For example, when shooting a big scene that contained many elements, all the elements would be included in the picture, which might make it seem like there was no distinction between primary and secondary. In terms of distortion control, it could highlight the majestic momentum of the picture. If the edge distortion was used well, it could enhance the expression. For example, when shooting a character, putting the limbs on the edge could produce the effect of long legs. However, if it was not used well, it would become a drawback. For example, if the face of the character was placed on the edge of the picture, it would be shot as a slanted " flat fatty." If the control was not good when shooting the building, it would make the building slanted. As for horizontal control, the inherent characteristics of the ultra-wide-angle lens made it difficult to control the horizon when shooting composition. It was easy to tilt the horizon when shooting with a hand, and the early process of shooting with a tripod was more cumbersome. In terms of depth of field performance, the super wide-angle lens was suitable for showing a large depth of field. It was almost impossible to shoot a shallow depth of field effect. If you wanted to have a deep and prominent feeling, you could only rely on reasonable composition. From the scope of use, the super wide-angle lens was not a " general use " type. The shooting subject was relatively limited, but it could show its unique charm when shooting scenery, architecture, and other subjects. For example, when shooting scenes such as extended corridors, spectacular buildings, and the internal structure of buildings, it could reflect the lens 'distortion control ability, color reproduction ability, special perspective relationship, and other advantages. It could also play a role in shooting special scenes such as the starry sky. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
Canon lenses and Nikon lenses were well-known brands in the field of camera lenses. In terms of Nikon lenses, the new Z-mount lenses were generally of high quality, such as holo-field compatibility and excellent corner resolution. The F-mount was limited by the caliber and the distance between the two sides, while the Z-mount had a great improvement in this aspect, especially in the wide-angle to mid-focal length section. Canon lenses, such as the RF28 - 70mm F2.8 lens, had a constant large aperture of F2.8. It was portable, and the image quality was average, even a little beyond the positioning of the silver ring lens. It also had anti-shake function. However, its price was sometimes affected by marketing routines. For example, during the 11/11 period, the price of Canon RF28 - 70mm was higher than the recommended price on the official website and did not return to normal value. These two lenses had their own optical design features, advantages, and market positioning under different camera mount systems. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
Based on context alone The lens of the camera lens was made up of many different types of lenses. This included a concave lens, which had a thick middle and thin edge structure. It had a converging effect on light, which helped to focus the light on the imaging plane, making the image clear. There were also concave lenses, which were thin in the middle and thick at the edges. They had a diffusing effect on light and were often used to correct aberrations. In addition, there were also aspheric lenses. These lenses were not the traditional spherical shape. They could better correct aberrations, improve image quality, and reduce image distortion and blurring. They were widely used in modern camera lenses. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>