To drive away the fish in the abyss and the sparrows in the thicket
" To drive away the fish for the abyss, to drive away the sparrows for the thicket " meant that the otter wanted to catch fish to eat, but drove the fish into the abyss. The hawk wanted to catch sparrows to eat, but drove the sparrows into the jungle. The original metaphor was inappropriate and counterproductive. Now it was used to describe not being good at uniting people or winning over people, driving the forces that could be relied on to the enemy. It was also used to describe not being good at governing, causing the people to lose their morale and turn to the enemy. It could also be used in a general sense to describe a certain idea or measure that was inappropriate and pushed something that was originally beneficial to oneself to the other party. It was equivalent to doing a good thing for the other party and doing a bad thing for oneself. The novel " Watching the Moon on Fish Island " is equally exciting. Everyone is welcome to click and read it!
To drive away the fish in the abyss and the sparrows in the thicket
The original meaning of this idiom was that the otter wanted to catch fish to eat, but drove the fish into the abyss; the hawk wanted to catch sparrows to eat, but drove the sparrows into the jungle. Originally, it was an inappropriate metaphor, but the result was counterproductive. Now, it can also be used as a metaphor for not being good at uniting or winning over people, driving the forces that can be relied on to the enemy side. It can also be used as a metaphor for not being good at governing, causing the people to lose their morale and turn to the enemy. Or in a general sense, it can be used to describe a certain idea or measure that is inappropriate, pushing things that are originally beneficial to oneself to the other party, doing good things for the other party, but bringing harm to oneself. In the political context, if the ruler exercised tyranny, it would also make the people turn to the enemy. This situation could also be described by this idiom. The novel " Watching the Moon on Fish Island " is equally exciting. Everyone is welcome to click and read it!
To drive away the fish in the abyss, to drive away the sparrows in the thicket
Drive the fish into deep waters and the sparrows into the thickets. Originally, it was a metaphor for improper methods that led to the opposite result. Later, it was used to describe rulers who practiced tyranny, causing the people to turn to the enemy side; it can also be used to describe not being good at uniting people and pushing those who should be in a close relationship to the opposite side. The novel " Watching the Moon on Fish Island " is equally exciting. Everyone is welcome to click and read it!
To drive away the fish in the abyss, to drive away the sparrows in the thicket
The following are some examples of sentences that use the phrase "drive away fish for the abyss, drive away sparrows for the thicket": In business competition, if a company was too harsh on its partners, it would be like driving away fish and sparrows. In the end, it would only make itself fall into a helpless situation. If the team leader couldn't treat the members fairly and always excluded the capable people, this kind of practice was tantamount to driving away the fish in the abyss and driving away the birds in the thicket, which would lead to the loss of talent in the team. If some countries blindly adopted a one-sided approach in their foreign policy and suppressed neighboring countries for no reason, they would actually be driving away fish and sparrows for the sake of the abyss, causing them to lose friendly international relations. The novel " Watching the Moon on Fish Island " is equally exciting. Everyone is welcome to click and read it!
To drive away the fish in the abyss, to drive away the sparrows in the thicket
The idiom "drive away the fish for the abyss, drive away the sparrows for the thicket" was not a good metaphor, but it backfired. It is now used as a metaphor for not being good at uniting people or winning over people, driving the forces that can be relied on to the enemy side; It is also used as a metaphor for the poor governance, the people's morale is lax, and the people are thrown to the enemy; It can also be used to describe a certain idea or measure that is inappropriate, pushing something that is originally beneficial to oneself to the other party, which is equivalent to doing a good thing for the other party, but harming the interests of one's own side. The novel " Watching the Moon on Fish Island " is equally exciting. Everyone is welcome to click and read it!
Drive the fish into the abyss, drive the sparrows into the thicket
Mencius said," Jie and Zhou lost the world because they lost the support of the common people. They lost the support of the common people because they lost the hearts of the people. There is a way to get the world: get the people, you can get the world; There is a way to get the people: get the hearts of the people, you can get the people; There is a way to get the hearts of the people: give them what the people want and accumulate for them. Don't impose on them what the people hate. That's all. The people submitted to benevolence and virtue, just like water flowing to the bottom and beasts running to the wilderness. Therefore, it was the fish-eating otter who brought the fish to the deep pool, the sparrow who brought the birds to the forest, and the Xia Jie and Yin Zhou who brought the common people to the deep pool for King Tang and King Wu of Zhou. Now, if there was a monarch who liked benevolence and virtue in the world, the vassals would drive the people over for him. Even if he didn't want to be king, he couldn't do it. Now, those who wanted to be kings were like a seven-year-old illness that needed to be treated with wormwood that had been stored for three years. If he didn't save up in advance, he wouldn't be able to get it for the rest of his life. If you are not determined to implement benevolent government, you will be sad and humiliated all your life, so that you will fall into the state of death. The Book of Songs says,'How can we do it well? It's just pulling each other to drown.' That's what I mean." The novel " Watching the Moon on Fish Island " is equally exciting. Everyone is welcome to click and read it!
Eating fish for the abyss, driving sparrows from the thicket
You may have misstated it, but the correct way to say it is to drive away the fish in the abyss and the birds in the thicket. The original meaning of this idiom is that the otter wants to catch fish to eat, but drives the fish into the abyss; the hawk wants to catch sparrows to eat, but drives the sparrows into the jungle. The original metaphor was not appropriate and counterproductive. Later, it was used to describe the tyranny of the ruler, causing the people to turn to the enemy, and it was also used to describe the inability to unite people, pushing people who should be close to each other to the opposite side. This idiom is also used as "driving fish into the abyss" or "driving sparrows into the thicket", which comes from Mencius. The novel " Watching the Moon on Fish Island " is equally exciting. Everyone is welcome to click and read it!
To drive away the fish for the abyss
The pronunciation of driving fish for the abyss is: wèi yuān qū y. The novel " Watching the Moon on Fish Island " is equally exciting. Everyone is welcome to click and read it!
To drive away the fish for the abyss
The pronunciation of driving fish for the abyss was wèi yuān qū y. The novel " Watching the Moon on Fish Island " is equally exciting. Everyone is welcome to click and read it!
To drive away the fish in the abyss, to drive away the nobility in the clumps
" To drive away fish for the abyss, to drive away nobles for the thicket " was a Chinese idiom, similar to " to drive away fish for the abyss, to drive away sparrows for the thicket ". This idiom comes from Mencius."Li Lou Shang":"Therefore, it is the otter who drives away the fish in the abyss." It was Jie and Zhou who drove the people for Tang and Wu." It meant that the otter wanted to catch fish to eat, but drove the fish into the abyss. The hawk wanted to catch sparrows to eat, but drove the sparrows into the jungle. The original metaphor was not good at uniting people or winning over people, driving the forces that could be relied on to the enemy side; it was also used to describe the poor governance that caused the people to lose their morale and turn to the enemy. For example, in history, Xia Jie and King Zhou of the Shang Dynasty were not good at governing and lost the hearts of the people. It was like " driving the fish into the abyss and driving the sparrows into the thicket ", driving the people to the side of Shang Tang and King Wu of Zhou. Chairman Mao also used this idiom to vividly describe the wrong practice of closed-doorism by saying,"Closed-doorism drives the fish into the abyss and the sparrows into the thicket, driving the thousands and thousands of people to the enemy's side, only to win the enemy's applause." The novel " Watching the Moon on Fish Island " is equally exciting. Everyone is welcome to click and read it!
The story of driving fish and sparrows into the abyss
During the Spring and Autumn Period, the students of Mencius debated the reasons for the demise of the Xia and Shang dynasties and asked Mencius for advice. Mencius gave an example. When the monarch implemented benevolent government, the common people would flock to the monarch like rivers returning to the sea. Otters ate fish but drove fish into the abyss. Eagles ate birds but drove birds into the depths of the forest. Mencius also believed that Jie and Zhou lost the world because they lost the hearts of the people. They drove the people to Shang Tang and Zhou Wang like otters driving away fish and harriers driving away sparrows. During the Anti-Japanese War, Chairman Mao used this idiom to describe the closed-doorists driving people who should have been united to the opposite side. This practice was only beneficial to the enemy and was extremely harmful to the establishment of a broad national revolutionary united front to fight against the Japanese. This idiom was originally used to mean that improper methods would produce the opposite effect. Now it is also used to mean that people who are not good at uniting or winning over people will drive their reliable forces to the enemy's side. It can also be used to mean that people will turn to the enemy because of poor governance. The novel " Watching the Moon on Fish Island " is equally exciting. Everyone is welcome to click and read it!