In a divorce lawsuit, a counterclaim refers to a claim made by the defendant against the plaintiff. The lawsuit filed by the plaintiff itself was the original lawsuit, and there was no situation where the plaintiff countersued the original lawsuit. Therefore, the plaintiff could not countersue the divorce in the lawsuit. Read more exciting novels for free
The following conditions must be met in order to counterclaim in a divorce lawsuit: 1. The person who raised the counterclaim must be the defendant of the lawsuit, and the object of the counterclaim must be the plaintiff of the lawsuit. 2. The counterclaim must be based on the existence of the lawsuit, and the object and reason of the counterclaim must be related to the lawsuit. 3. The purpose of a counterclaim is to annex or offset the claims of the main complaint. 4. The counterclaim must be filed after the complaint is accepted and before the court debate ends. 5. The counterclaim must be brought to the people's court that accepted the complaint. It should be noted that in divorce proceedings, for some requests made by the defendant, such as child support and property division requests in the defense statement or within the time limit for evidence, although it is similar to a counterclaim in form, it does not constitute a counterclaim in the civil procedure law in essence. The court should ask the defendant to clarify its claim, and the claim should be combined and notified to pay the lawsuit fees in advance according to the relevant regulations. In addition, in some cases, although it seems to meet the conditions for counterclaims, from the overall characteristics of divorce proceedings (such as divorce proceedings is the merger of the three lawsuits of dissolving marriage, property and child support, etc.), some of the requests made by the defendant may not constitute a counterclaim. For example, the man's request to return the dowry after the woman filed for divorce does not constitute a counterclaim in a strict legal sense. However, the court may consider a joint trial to improve the efficiency of the lawsuit and reduce the burden of the parties. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
If the plaintiff had already sued and withdrawn the lawsuit, the defendant could file a counterclaim. After the lawsuit was withdrawn, the court would usually allow the defendant to withdraw the counterclaim. Because withdrawing the lawsuit is the right of the parties involved, the parties involved in this lawsuit and the counterclaim have equal litigation rights. Since the withdrawal of this lawsuit is not illegal, the counterclaim plaintiff (i.e., the defendant of this lawsuit) does not need to review the withdrawal of the counterclaim, and the court should allow it. Moreover, the withdrawal of this lawsuit did not affect the hearing of the counterclaim. Although this lawsuit and the counterclaim are related, they are independent of each other. After the counterclaim is raised, it will not be extinguished because of the withdrawal of this lawsuit. On the one hand, the counterclaim was independent. After it was filed according to the requirements of the lawsuit, it had its own independence, and it was reasonable for the court to continue hearing it. On the other hand, the counterclaim had a certain degree of dependence on the lawsuit. After the lawsuit was withdrawn, the counterclaim would lose its targeting but become a special form of lawsuit, and the court should continue hearing it. Moreover, from the relevant legal provisions, it could be inferred that the counterclaim and this lawsuit did not have to be jointly tried. The counterclaim could be tried separately. After the lawsuit was withdrawn, the rejection of the counterclaim would lead to unresolved contradictions and increase the burden of the lawsuit. In addition, after the withdrawal of this lawsuit, the trial of the counterclaim will continue to use the case number of this lawsuit. However, the counterclaim originated from the main action. After the main action was withdrawn, the counterclaim would continue to be tried within the scope of the involvement of the main action. The claim based on the counterclaim should be related to the main action and should not exceed the scope of the main action. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
After the plaintiff withdrew the lawsuit, the defendant could not raise a counterclaim. The existence of a counterclaim is based on the premise of this lawsuit. The withdrawal of the lawsuit by the plaintiff means that the trial of this lawsuit has ended, and the legal relationship and facts on which the defendant raised the counterclaim no longer exist. However, the defendant may file a lawsuit in another people's court that has jurisdiction. The following conditions must be met: the plaintiff is a citizen, legal person, or other organization that has a direct interest in the case; there is a clear defendant; there are specific claims, facts, and reasons for the lawsuit; it is within the scope of the people's court's acceptance of civil litigation and under the jurisdiction of the people's court. If the case has entered the trial stage and the plaintiff withdraws the lawsuit, the defendant's counterclaim shall be dealt with according to the provisions of article 239 of the Supreme People's Court's Interpretation on the application of the Civil Lawsuit Law of the People's Republic of China. If the people's court permits the plaintiff to withdraw the lawsuit, it shall continue to hear the counterclaim. If the defendant applied to withdraw the counterclaim, the people's court should allow it, but this was only for the case that had already entered the trial stage. This provision did not apply when the case had not entered the substantial trial stage after the case was filed. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
In a lawsuit, the following conditions must be met for the defendant to file a counterclaim: 1. The counterclaim met the requirements for a lawsuit, namely, the plaintiff was a citizen, legal person, or other organization that had a direct interest in the case; there was a clear defendant; there were specific claims, facts, and reasons for the lawsuit; it was within the scope of the people's court accepting civil litigation and under the jurisdiction of the people's court. 2. A counterclaim can only be brought by the defendant against the plaintiff in the court hearing the lawsuit, which means that the people's court hearing the lawsuit has jurisdiction over the counterclaim. 3. The counterclaim did not exceed the limitation of action. As an independent lawsuit, the counterclaim should comply with the legal provisions of the limitation of action. It could not be considered that the lawsuit was within the limitation of action, so the counterclaim was naturally within the limitation of action. 4. The counterclaim must be of the same nature as the complaint and must be subject to the same proceedings. If the counterclaim is of an administrative nature, the counterclaim cannot be established; if the counterclaim applies special procedures and the original complaint applies ordinary procedures, the counterclaim cannot be established; but the original complaint and the counterclaim apply ordinary procedures and simple procedures respectively, then they can be combined to form a counterclaim and apply ordinary procedures for trial. 5. Counterclaims should be filed before the end of the court debate. After the case has been accepted and before the court debate is over, if the defendant raises a counterclaim, the people's court shall try it together if it is possible to do so. 6. The request and the facts of the counterclaim are related to the lawsuit and have a legal connection. Otherwise, it will be sued separately and cannot be tried together. Although the counterclaim is related to the lawsuit, it is independent after being raised and can exist without the lawsuit. Generally, it will be tried together with the lawsuit. However, if the plaintiff withdraws the lawsuit, the counterclaim can continue to be tried. If the plaintiff does not appear in court, the court can make a judgment on the counterclaim in absentia. The procedure for the defendant to make a counterclaim was generally based on the practice of a lawsuit. The defendant submitted a counterclaim and a copy to the court, stating the request, facts, and reasons for the counterclaim. The court would decide whether to accept it after review. After the counterclaim was accepted, the original defendant would exchange litigation status, and both parties would enjoy the corresponding litigation rights and obligations. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
You can't countersue after losing a lawsuit. A counterclaim was a claim that the defendant made against the plaintiff during the course of the lawsuit. If the case has been concluded and lost, it does not meet the time requirements for counterclaims. Counterclaims cannot be made, but they can be sued according to the specific circumstances. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
In a civil case where the defendant filed a counterclaim, if the plaintiff withdraws the lawsuit, the people's court shall make a ruling on the part of the lawsuit, allowing the plaintiff to withdraw the lawsuit, and continue to hear the counterclaim and make a judgment according to law. Because a counterclaim was an independent claim made by the defendant, it was independent of the complaint and could exist independently. The parties to this lawsuit and the counterclaim have equal litigation rights. The plaintiff has the right to withdraw the lawsuit, and the defendant also has the right to withdraw the counterclaim. If the defendant applies to withdraw the counterclaim, the people's court shall permit it. However, although the plaintiff withdrew the lawsuit during the trial of the case, since the counterclaim originated from the lawsuit, the counterclaim could still be tried within the scope of the lawsuit after the withdrawal of the lawsuit. Moreover, the claim made by the counterclaim plaintiff based on the counterclaim should be related to the lawsuit and should not exceed the scope of the lawsuit. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
The defendant had to file a counterclaim before the deadline to protect the plaintiff's right of defense and to determine the dispute before the court session. A counterclaim was an independent claim made by the defendant. Therefore, even if the plaintiff withdrew the lawsuit, the defendant's counterclaim could still continue and would not be invalid or terminated because of the withdrawal of the lawsuit. However, if the case is determined after the case is filed and the plaintiff withdraws the lawsuit before entering the entity trial, the counterclaim cannot be accepted as a counterclaim. If the party continues to insist on the counterclaim, he can file a lawsuit to the people's court with jurisdiction. After the case has entered the trial stage, when the plaintiff withdraws the lawsuit, the people's court shall make a ruling on the part of the lawsuit and allow the plaintiff to withdraw. The counterclaim shall continue to be heard and be judged according to law. The defendant also has the right to withdraw the counterclaim. If the defendant applies to withdraw the counterclaim, the people's court shall allow it. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
The main actors of the TV series Divorce Lawsuit produced in 2007 were Li Chen, Sun Chun, Ding Mengyu, and Chen Lina. Click on the link below to read the comic "After Divorce, My Ex-Husband Became My Loyal Dog"
According to the provisions of article 18 of the "Rules for the payment of litigation fees", if the defendant filed a counterclaim and the people's court decided to combine the trial, the litigation fees for this lawsuit and the counterclaim would be reduced by half respectively. Therefore, when the other party countersued, the legal fees for the original and counterclaims could be halved. The original intention of this regulation was that in the case of the joint trial of the main and counterclaims, the original two lawsuits should pay the legal fees in full, but the joint trial only occupied the judicial resources of one lawsuit and saved the resources of one lawsuit. Therefore, the principle of filling in was adopted to reduce the legal fees of the joint trial by half. Specifically, the main and counterclaims were halved. From the perspective of the grammar of the text, the relevant expression in article 18 should also be understood as the legal fees for the original and counterclaims were halved respectively. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>