The political review of university party applications mainly examined two aspects. On the one hand, it was a review of the applicants themselves, focusing on their attitudes towards the party's line, principles, and policies. This was because university students usually had fewer major performances in political history and major historical events. On the other hand, it was a review of immediate family members and major social relations. The focus was usually on immediate family members (such as parents). The main review was to see if there were any illegal acts, whether there were records of criminal detention or sentence. In addition, if it was a single-parent family, only the surviving party would be examined. The political review work was generally carried out by the grassroots party organization. During the political review, letters of transfer and supporting materials of related parties might be used. The supporting materials would contain basic information and conclusions such as criminal situations. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
The political review of joining the party was a comprehensive and meticulous process. Although proving that his immediate family members had no criminal records was part of the political review, it was not the only basis. During the political review, the party organization would consider all aspects. If the immediate family members could not provide proof of innocence, the party organization would further verify the relevant information, such as the specific behavior and political history of the family members through other channels. If a relative fails to report truthfully or conceals a criminal record, this is a serious problem and should be reported to the party organization in a timely manner for handling. In the end, whether the children could pass the party political review depended on the overall review, including the children's own political stance, character performance, and other aspects of the political review of their immediate family members, such as their attitude towards the party's line and policy, political history and performance in major political struggles, law-abiding and social morality, etc. If they performed well in other aspects and met the requirements to join the party, they might not completely deny their children's political review because their immediate family members did not have a criminal certificate. However, if their immediate family members had serious problems that affected their political judgment of their children, it might affect the results of the political review. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
The illegal records in the political review of party members included, but were not limited to, acts that violated public security regulations such as prostitution (such as the case in Material 3), and minor illegal records such as smoking in Internet cafes that were punished by administrative punishment (such as the case in Material 7). At the same time, the political review would also examine the law-abiding situation, which covered all kinds of possible illegal and criminal acts. In addition, immediate family members or close major social relations will also be examined for illegal and criminal situations. However, if the development target has been tested for a long time, has consistently performed well, can correctly recognize the mistakes made by immediate family members, and does meet the requirements of party members, they can also be admitted into the party after strict examination by the party organization. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
The 2020 police recruitment policy stipulated that if a family member of the subject of investigation had any of the following circumstances, he or she could not be identified as a candidate for employment: First, serious crimes with bad social impact such as intentional homicide, intentional injury causing serious injury or death, rape, robbery, drug trafficking, arson, explosion, and throwing of dangerous substances, or corruption and bribery of a large amount, with serious circumstances, subject to criminal punishment; The second is to commit acts that endanger national security, honor, and interests; the third is to organize, participate in, or support violent and terrorist organizations, ethnic divisions, religious extremes, cults, and underworld organizations, or participate in related activities. In addition, there was also a rule that other situations that might affect the fair performance of the subject's duties after employment could not pass the political review, but there was no clear rule on which ones belonged to this scope. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
The degree of strictness of the university's political review varied according to the type of institution. For military schools, the political checks were very strict. They would check the person, family members (including spouse, parents, children, unmarried siblings, and other co-residents, regardless of whether they were biological, adopted, or step-parents), and major social relations (such as married siblings, grandparents, and grandparents). The police academy's political review was more lenient than the military academy's, mainly examining the candidates themselves and their family members. Among the judicial police schools, only the Central Judicial Police Academy had an undergraduate degree, and there was an internal assessment that could achieve a high police admission rate. Other judicial police schools needed to take the civil servant examination to get the establishment. There was not much special explanation for the political review, but they generally followed the relevant political review principles. Special colleges such as Beijing Institute of Electronic Science and Technology, Shanghai customs college, international relations college, foreign affairs college, China fire rescue college, etc. Different colleges had different recruitment rates, but they did not explicitly mention that the degree of political review was different from other types of colleges. However, considering the establishment situation, their political review should follow the corresponding requirements for the recruitment of public officials. There were also some universities that did not have clear political review requirements, such as the civil air defense undergraduate course of the Army Engineering University, the weapons orientation of Tsinghua University, the minority language major of Beijing Foreign Studies University, law, finance, etc. Although it did not affect admission, it might affect future employment. Therefore, it was recommended that candidates consider whether their political review situation met the requirements. In short, it could not be simply said that the university's political review was strict or not. It had to be judged based on various factors such as different types of institutions, professional situations, and future employment directions. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
If the file was transferred to the local talent center for the political review of the development target, the file receiving unit must first issue a transfer letter. I need to bring my personal ID card, household register and other materials to the local talent center, fill in the form as required to apply for a transfer letter (different places may require different materials, you can call first). Then, I will bring the file transfer letter to the file storage place to request a transfer. Pay attention to the time limit on the file transfer letter and handle it within the validity period. The original file storage place would send the files to the talent market through confidential means. After about seven working days, you could call to inquire whether the files had arrived at the talent market and complete the file transfer. He had to ensure that these matters were handled well before the political review so as not to affect the use of the political review. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
In the public recruitment of teachers, there were many differences between the review (qualification review) and the political review. 1. ** Different timing **: The review will be conducted before the interview, while the political review will be conducted after the physical examination. 2. ** The content of the review is different **: - ** Re-examination **: It mainly checks whether the applicants meet the recruitment requirements, such as whether they have the corresponding degree certificate, teacher qualification certificate, household registration certificate, freshman certificate, etc. The specific requirements of the qualification examination announcement shall prevail. - Political Review: After passing the interview and physical examination, the person's thoughts, morality, style, and other aspects will be reviewed. Generally, as long as there is no illegal or criminal behavior, the person will usually pass. At the same time, the political review would also verify the candidate's educational background, degree, and teacher qualifications. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>