To choose a full-frame lens within the budget of 4000 yuan, you can refer to the following types: - ** Ultra-wide angle lens **: If you don't mind the shape of the light bulb, the Sima 14 - 242.8 is a good choice. Its focal length is wide enough, and its aperture of 2.8 is enough to shoot the Milky Way. It's also cost-effective in terms of price, image quality, focal length, aperture, and many other aspects. If the light bulb head was not acceptable, the price of the 16 - 35F4 was relatively more affordable. - ** Telephoto lens **: The SIGMA100 - 400 is relatively cheap and light. Although the image quality is average, it is a good choice for a telephoto lens with a budget of about 4000 yuan. Of course, the choice of lens also needed to be based on personal preferences (such as landscape, portrait, sports, etc.), the balance of quality and weight. Read more exciting novels for free
Here are some recommendations for full-frame DSLR lenses: - The Nikon 18 - 35mmF3.5 - 4.5D full-frame wide-angle lens was very cost-effective and could be bought for only a few hundred yuan. - Yongnuo YN 35mm F2N (Nikon F), priced at 632 yuan, was a durable wide-angle fixed-focus lens with glass lenses. - Nikon AF-Nikkor 50mm f/1.8D standard fixed-focus head, priced at 799 yuan, equipped with automatic object distance uploading body and 3D matrix dimming function. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
It was feasible to install a full-frame lens on a half-frame body, but there were some problems. From the perspective of angle, due to the small size of the sensor on the half-frame body, the actual shooting angle would be narrower, about 1.5 times or 1.6 times, which had a significant impact on wide-angle shooting. For example, the 50mm full-frame lens on the APS-C camera was equivalent to the 75mm or 80mm lens, which would weaken the wide-angle effect, which was not conducive to large-scale scenery and architectural shooting. In terms of depth of field effect, although the focal length of the lens was longer due to the equivalent focal length, it would not obtain an additional shallow depth of field effect. It might be difficult to achieve soft background blurring in portrait photography. For high sensitivity performance, this mainly depended on the camera's sensor rather than the lens, so a full-frame lens would not improve the high Iso performance of a half-frame camera. The full-frame lens was designed for a full-frame body. When used in a half-frame camera, the edge of the lens would not be used, resulting in the potential of the lens not being fully utilized, and the performance of the lens would be reduced. In terms of image quality, it mainly affected the image quality at the edge of the lens (the center image quality was usually not affected, especially after the aperture was reduced. This effect was not significant on high-quality lenses), and the number of final image resolution would be reduced after APS-C mode was turned on. Full-frame lenses were usually larger, heavier, and more expensive than half-frame lenses. Mounted on a half-frame body would offset the advantages of a half-frame camera being light and portable, and it would also put pressure on people with limited budget. In addition, the autofocus performance of the full-frame lens was worse on the half-frame body. Different brands and models of lenses and bodies might have problems such as slow focusing speed and reduced accuracy, which would affect the shooting efficiency. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
Canon's EF24 - 70mm f/2.8L USM first-generation lens was a 135mm full-frame lens. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
There were many factors to consider when choosing a 70 - 200 full-frame lens. From the brand and model point of view, Canon had the EF70 - 200mm lens series, including F2.8LIS USM, F2.8LIS II USM, F2.8LIS USM, F4LIS USM and many other models. Different models had differences in aperture, anti-shake, image quality, etc. For example, a larger aperture lens might have an advantage in low-light environments and blurring effects. The LUMIX S Pro 70 - 200mm F2.8 O.I.S. lens from Matsushita was aimed at the professional market. It had a large aperture of 2.8 for creative production. The lens was equipped with a tripod ring, and its button design made it easy for the user to adjust the anti-shake adjustment, focus adjustment, and other personal settings. It was similar in appearance to the F4 lens of the same series, and the workmanship was solid. It supported splash resistance and could be used in low temperature environments of-10 ° C. Its optical image stabilization could be selected in different gears, and the shortcut button could be customized. The lens had an aperture of 82mm, which guaranteed light transmission and high image quality. The number of 11 aperture blades made the blurring performance excellent, and the double floating focus design was used to suppress the breathing effect. In the image quality test, the center image quality was sharper under different focal lengths, and the edge image quality also had its own characteristics in each focal length. Sima had an APO 70 - 200mm f/2.8 EXDG OS HSM full-frame large-aperture telephoto lens with optical image stabilization and an APO zoom lens. In addition, he also had to consider the use of the lens. If it was mainly used for portrait photography, the 70 - 200mm lens was a good choice for portrait lenses. It could zoom in on people from a distance, and the 200-point camera was suitable for close-ups. However, compared to 85mm, 135mm and other classic portrait fixed-focus lenses, there was a certain gap in image quality and blurring out of focus. However, special out of focus effects could also be achieved by sticking coins on the UV-lens. In terms of landscape photography, the 70-end could cope with most telephoto shooting needs, making it easier to compose than wide-angle; the 200-end could bring the vision into the distance, recording distant details and light and shadow, and the telephoto lens could make the picture feel compressed, exaggerating the distance and compressing the depth of field. The size, weight, and price of the lens could not be ignored. For example, Canon's EF70 - 200F4IS lens was well-coordinated with the body, making it unobstructed for long-term holding and walking. The original suggested retail price was raised from $1,299 to $1,499 (for reference only, the price would fluctuate according to different sales channels and time), and some models would be stopped in March 2021, which would also affect the purchase choice. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
Nikon had many classic full-frame lenses. The following were some of the more classic lenses: - The Nikkor Z 24 - 200mm f/4 - 6.3 VR lens had a focal length ranging from wide-angle to telephoto. It was lightweight and had excellent image quality, which could meet the shooting needs of most users. - The Nikkor Z 50mm f/1.8S full-frame fixed-focus lens was suitable for users who pursued extreme image quality and dark light shooting. - Ais Nikon lens, suitable for three kinds of exposure procedures, can be used with most Nikon bodies, high compatibility. - Nikon Nikkor Z 14 - 30mm f/4S super wide-angle lens (zoom). - Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16 - 35mm f/4G ED VR super wide-angle zoom lens with two focusing modes (M/A| M)。 - Nikon AF18mm f2.8D super wide-angle lens. - Old Frog 10mmF2.8, as Old Frog's 10th anniversary work, was Old Frog's first full-frame autofocus super wide-angle lens. - The Z85F1.2 lens was excellent at shooting portraits. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
Here are some of the recommended full-frame lenses from Sonny: 1. SonyFE24 - 70mm f/2.8GM: Extremely cost-effective, suitable for landscape, portrait, and street photography. It has a wide-angle and medium-telephoto distance of a full-frame lens, a constant aperture of f/2.8, and advanced lens anti-shake technology. It is an excellent shooting tool. 2. SonyFE70 - 200mm f/2.8GM OSS: suitable for long-distance shooting such as sports, wild animals, and portraits. It uses high-speed autofocus, advanced anti-shake technology, constant f/2.8 aperture, first-class depth of field and high-quality imaging, which is an essential tool for professional photographers. 3. SonyFE16 - 35mm f/2.8GM: suitable for photography enthusiasts or professional photography enthusiasts. The ultra-wide and medium-wide focal lengths make it a practical tool for shooting buildings, landscapes, and indoor scenes. It uses advanced autofocus, constant f/2.8 aperture, and anti-shake technology. 4. SonyFE85mm f/1.4GM: suitable for portrait photography needs, wide aperture, shallow depth of field and high-quality imaging effects. It also has advanced autofocus and anti-shake technology, which can obtain professional and creative portrait photography works. 5. Sonnar T*: 55mm focal length fixed-focus lens, PE mount, high-quality image quality, F1.8 large aperture, custom-made by Zeiss for Sonny, suitable for portraits, street photography, scenery and many other subjects. It is the first choice of high-quality fixed-focus lens for many people. 6. SIGMAR Modern: 28 - 70mm standard zoom lens, a full-frame micro-monocle lens with a Sony-E-mount. The focal length covers the daily wide-angle, medium-focal length, and medium-telephoto lengths. The F2.8 constant large aperture is extremely cost-effective and has excellent image quality. 7. The 24 - 105mm focal length large zoom lens of the Sony-series was a high-definition G-series lens. It was suitable for photography enthusiasts who wanted both high quality and a large zoom range. 8. The original 85mm fixed-focus lens of the Sony-made company: F1.8 aperture, a full-frame fixed-focus lens, suitable for portrait and macro shooting. It can get a better background blurring effect when shooting portraits, and it's also good for shooting distant scenery. 9. The 35mm F1.8 full-frame wide-angle fixed-focus lens was a wide-angle lens that was suitable for shooting large scenes and covering more images. It was also suitable for indoor close-up shots, portraits, and landscape shots. It had a large depth of field and was suitable for cultural documentary, portraits, scenery, and street shots. It also performed well in wedding photography. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
If the Canon 60D (half-frame camera) was equipped with a full-frame lens, as long as the camera and lens were both equipped with an EP interface, it could be installed directly. However, it was important to note that when a full-frame lens was used on a half-frame camera, there would be a 1.6x focal length conversion factor, and the lens angle would be narrower. For example, if a 50mm full-frame lens was used on a Canon 60D, the focal length would be 1.6*50 = 80mm. If you wanted a wider angle of view, you could consider using an ESF-S lens designed for half-frame cameras. ESF-S lenses were generally lighter and cheaper than full-frame lenses, and were more suitable for landscape shooting. However, ESF-S lenses could not be used on full-frame cameras. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
The full-frame 50mm f/1.8 lens was a fixed-focus lens, which belonged to the 135mm full-frame micro-single lens. The lens mount was the PE mount, and the filter size was 49mm. In terms of optical parameters, the maximum aperture was F1.8, the minimum aperture was F22, the number of aperture blades was 7, the focal length was fixed at 50mm, the closest focusing distance was 0.45m, the maximum magnification was 0.15 times, and there was no anti-shake performance. The structure of the lens was composed of five sets of six lenses, including one aspheric lens. The lens used a metal bayonet, which was sturdy and durable. The focusing ring was wide and the vibration was moderate. It felt comfortable. In terms of price, the official yen price was 38,000 yen, which was about 2500 yuan, and the price was about 1632 yuan. When it came to e-commerce promotions, the price could be even lower. The cost-performance advantage was obvious. In terms of imaging performance, the center sharpness was around 96%, the center resolution was around 78%, and the edge resolution dropped significantly. A large aperture could bring about a better blurring effect. It could be used to highlight the main body in portraits and scenery shooting. It also had an advantage in night shooting because it could obtain sufficient light. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
Pentax had full-frame fisheye lenses, such as the Pentax DA Fish-Eye 10 - 17mm f/3.5 - 4.5ED fisheye lens (zoom), which had an attention index of 100 and a price of 2889 yuan. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
Half-frame cameras could use full-frame lenses to shoot, but there were some problems and limitations. Due to the small sensor of the half-frame camera, the actual shooting angle would be narrowed by about 1.5 times or 1.6 times. For example, a 50mm full-frame lens was equivalent to a 75mm or 80mm lens on the APS-C camera. This had a significant impact on wide-angle shooting, which would weaken the wide-angle effect and limit the shooting of large scenes and buildings. Although the focal length of the full-frame lens was longer due to the equivalent focal length, it would not obtain an additional shallow depth of field effect. It might be difficult to achieve a soft background blurring effect in portrait photography. Moreover, the high sensitivity performance was determined by the camera's sensor, and using a full-frame lens would not directly improve the high Iso performance of a half-frame camera. The full-frame lens was designed to cover a larger sensor to match the full-frame body. When used in a half-frame camera, the edge of the lens would not be used, resulting in the full potential of the lens not being fully utilized, and the performance of the lens would be reduced. In terms of image quality, it mainly affected the image quality at the edge of the lens. The image quality at the center was usually unaffected (especially for wide-angle lenses), but on high-quality lenses, this effect was not significant after the aperture was reduced. When APS-C mode was turned on, it was equivalent to trimming the full-frame sensor, which would reduce the number of final images. For example, when the SonyA7R3 turned on the APS-C mode, the number of images was reduced from about 42 million to about 17.8 million. Full-frame lenses were usually larger and heavier than half-frame lenses. Mounted on a half-frame body would offset the advantages of a half-frame camera being light and portable, and full-frame lenses were more expensive, putting pressure on photographers with limited budget. In addition, the autofocus performance of the full-frame lens may be poor on the half-frame body. There may be differences in compatibility between different brands and models of lenses and the body, and problems such as slow focusing speed and reduced accuracy may affect the shooting efficiency. However, for some entry-level full-frame lenses installed on the APS-C format camera, they could basically avoid the relatively poor edge of the lens and only use the central part of the lens. The image quality was good, such as the Canon 17 - 40 red circle lens. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>