What's the difference between a micro camera, a DSLR, and a mobile phone?
There were many differences between micro-cameras, DSLR cameras, and cell phones: ** 1. Image Quality ** 1. ** Effect of sensor size ** - DSLR and micro lenses generally had relatively large sensor size, which gave them a certain advantage in terms of image quality. A larger sensor could capture more light and details. For example, when shooting scenes such as scenery and people, the DSLR and micro-single lens could better display the subtleties of the picture, while the sensor size of the mobile phone was relatively small, and there was a gap between the image quality and the DSLR and micro-single lens. 2. ** Analysis, noise reduction, and detailed presentation ** - DSLR cameras performed better in terms of resolution and noise reduction, and could record more details. When taking photos, DSLR had advantages in terms of dispersion suppression, dark light noise reduction, and zooming in details. The microphone was slightly inferior to the DSLR in these aspects, but the picture quality of the microphone was also better than that of the mobile phone. When the photos taken by the mobile phone were enlarged to the original size, the performance of noise control was poor, especially in the dark environment. The quality of the photos taken by the mobile phone was obviously different from that of the DSLR and the micro camera. ** 2. Operation ** 1. ** Focus Operation ** - The DSLR mainly used the viewfinder to see the scene in real time. There was no delay, and there were various focusing methods. It could focus accurately according to one's needs. The focus of the micro-camera could only be automatically selected on the screen. Although there was an auto-focus function (press the shutter halfway to auto-focus and then press all the buttons to shoot), it was not as autonomous as the DSLR. The focusing speed of mobile phones was relatively slow, but some mobile phones had a touch screen focusing function, which was more convenient to operate. However, in professional photography scenes, the accuracy and speed of focusing were not as good as that of DSLR and microphone. 2. ** Adjusting parameters ** - The DSLR mainly relied on the mechanical keys such as the wheel to operate the parameters, which tested experience. The microphone could be operated using a combination of screen and mechanical keys, which was relatively more intuitive and convenient. The parameters of the phone were relatively simple to adjust. It was easy for beginners to get started with photography, but the range of parameters that could be adjusted was limited. It was not as flexible as the single-lens reflex and micro-lens when it came to photography. 3. ** Shooting Mode ** - There were many types of dumpster shooting modes in the micro camera. For example, the macro mode could give the feeling of a fixed focus. There were also many shooting modes for mobile phones, such as panoramic mode, night view mode, etc. However, the shooting mode of DSLR depended more on the photographer's proficiency in the camera functions and manual settings. It was relatively more professional and complicated. ** 3. Portability ** - The mobile phone was the most portable and could be taken out anytime and anywhere to take photos. The micro-monocle was small and had better mobility than the DSLR. The DSLR was larger and heavier due to the structure of the reflective plate and pentaprism, so it was less portable. ** 4. In terms of camera lens ** - DSLR lenses had a wide range of choices, providing more choices to meet different shooting needs, such as wide-angle, telephoto, macro, and other different types of lenses. Moreover, they had a wealth of knowledge about lenses and were easy to learn. The range of lens options for a micro-lens was relatively narrow compared to a DSLR. Although mobile phones had multiple lenses, such as wide-angle lenses and telephoto lenses, the optical performance and reappearance of the lenses were far inferior to that of single-lens reflex lenses and micro-lenses. ** 5. Video Shooting ** - The micro-camera performed better in terms of focusing and video specifications when shooting videos. It was more convenient to operate and better for capturing videos. DSLR cameras were relatively poor at focusing on video. Although mobile phones could also shoot videos, there was a gap between them in terms of image quality, focus, video specifications, and so on. However, the convenience of shooting videos with mobile phones was its advantage. Read more exciting novels for free
The difference between a cell phone camera and a DSLR
There were differences between cell phone cameras and DSLR cameras in the following aspects: ###1. Operation Mode and Specialization 1. ** Ease of operation ** - Mobile phones had evolved from fully automatic photography to adding professional manual mode, but the overall operation was easier than DSLR. The phone was easy to use and was very convenient for the general public to record daily life scenes. They did not need too much photography knowledge to take qualified photos. - The operation of a single-lens reflex camera was more complicated and required a certain level of photography knowledge. For example, a single-lens reflex camera could accurately set the shutter, aperture, sensitivity, and other parameters according to the shooting needs to meet different shooting creativity and environmental requirements. For professional photographers or photography enthusiasts, it could better control the shooting effect, but for beginners, the learning cost was high. 2. ** Manipulation ** - Even though the shutter speed, aperture, and so on could be adjusted in the professional mode, the maneuverability was still inferior to that of a DSLR in some special situations. For example, in some scenes where the shutter speed was extremely high, the DSLR camera could adjust the shutter speed more accurately. - The lens of the single-lens reflex camera could be changed, and different lenses were suitable for different shooting scenes (such as wide-angle lens for shooting large scenes, telephoto lens for shooting long-range or close-up, etc.), which greatly increased the flexibility and professionalism of the single-lens reflex camera in different scenes. The phone lens was relatively fixed. Although there was a multi-camera configuration, there was still a gap between the imaging and the real optical lens. ###2. Image Effect 1. ** Image Quality ** - DSLR cameras had a larger color range than cell phones. Even though there were many smart phones that could provide high-quality images, the settings of the DSLR camera could be adjusted freely to ensure that the images were better. - Mobile phones were limited by their hardware, and their imaging was limited. For example, the size of the sensor was small, mostly between 1/2.3 and 1/1.5, while the size of the sensor of the DSLR camera was larger, which allowed the DSLR to capture light better in low light environments, reduce noise, and obtain clearer and more detailed images. 2. ** Void Effect ** - Although mobile phones now had the concept of depth of field to produce the effect of background blurring, the effect of the blurring of the background was either not good or not natural enough. It relied heavily on the calculation of the mobile phone chip. The DSLR camera could produce a natural depth of field effect through the optical lens. Whether it was the blurring of the background or the blurring of the background, it could better meet the needs of close-up shots such as portraits and flowers. 3. ** Zooming ability ** - Most mobile phones had digital zooming, which was a loss of zooming. Zooming when shooting long-range shots would cause the quality of the image to decrease. Although some mobile phones achieved a non-destructive zooming, the magnification was limited. - The lens of the DSLR camera was an optical lens. Its biggest selling point was its non-destructive zooming. Even if it was shooting a distant view such as a crater on the surface of the moon, as long as the focal length of the lens was enough, it could be clearly recorded. 4. ** Depth of field compression effect ** - Some phones could achieve better depth of field compression, but some phones couldn't, which was related to the phone's sensor and lens. When shooting with the optical telephoto lens of a single-lens reflex camera, it was easy to obtain the depth of field compression effect, making the subject in the photo feel closer. 5. ** Shutter performance ** - Mobile phones used electronic shutters, and there was an obvious lag after the high-speed shutter was pressed, which was not conducive to capturing photos and made it easy to miss important pictures. Moreover, the continuous shooting speed of a mobile phone was slower than that of a single-lens reflex camera. - DSLR cameras used a mechanical shutter, and they could shoot immediately when the shutter was pressed. As long as the shutter speed was fast enough, they could quickly capture moving objects without smearing. ###3. Device Characteristics 1. ** Universal and Portable ** - There were many smart phones, more than the world's population. It was very common for everyone to have one. Moreover, the mobile phone was light and portable. It could be placed in the shirt pocket. When it was carried, it was almost impossible to see that it was carrying a device. There was no need to bring additional accessories when traveling. - DSLR cameras were still the main shooting equipment for professional photographers. Although many amateur photographers owned them, they were not as common as mobile phones. Moreover, the DSLR camera was cumbersome and had a large number of accessories (such as extra batteries, lenses, flashlights, tripods, etc.). Not only was it inconvenient to carry it when traveling, but there was also the risk of losing the accessories. 2. ** Ease of sharing information ** - It was very easy for mobile phones to share photos and videos taken through social media platforms. They could be transmitted directly. - Although DSLR cameras had connection options such as Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and Bluetooth to share information, they also needed a compatible mobile application to share images and photos on social media, or they had to be connected to a laptop, tablet, or PC to share. Earlier DSLR cameras could only be connected through a data cable, and the high quality of the photos was also a test of the transmission speed. 3. ** Picture editing convenience ** - The phone came with an image editing function, and you could also download a large number of high-quality image editing applications from the Internet for free, such as Snapseed, Instagram, SloPro, CloudSplash Felix, etc., which could make a variety of creative editing of images. - DSLR cameras either used the built-in editing function or transferred the images to a laptop or PC and used professional photo editing software (such as Photoshop) for editing. It was not as convenient and fast as a mobile phone. 4. ** Cost ** - Although high-quality smart phones were more expensive, they were much cheaper than high-quality single-lens reflex cameras. Other than the body, the lens of the DSLR camera was expensive. After purchasing it, one usually needed to choose multiple lenses. They also needed to spend a lot of money on cleaning the camera and other services to protect it from weather changes. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
The difference between a cloud camera and a mobile phone camera
There were many differences between a cloud camera and a mobile phone camera: - ** Portableness **: - Mobile phones were highly portable. People would carry their mobile phones with them every day and could use them to take photos anytime, anywhere. - Although the pan tilt camera was more portable than some professional photography equipment, it still needed to be carried in addition to the mobile phone, so it was slightly less convenient. - ** Anti-shake performance **: - The pan/tilt camera was specially designed for shooting. It usually had a strong anti-shake ability, which could effectively reduce the blurring of the image caused by hand-shaking. For example, the pan/tilt camera series of Djiang could also ensure the stability of the image when shooting dynamic images or shooting in unstable environments. - Although many mobile phones now had anti-shake functions, in complex shooting environments or scenes that required high stability, the anti-shake effect was usually not as good as that of a pan tilt camera. - ** Image Quality **: - The pan tilt camera was generally equipped with a professional lens and image sensor, which was better in terms of image quality. It could present richer details, more accurate color reproduction, and better low-light shooting effects. - Mobile phones were limited by factors such as size. Although the picture quality of some high-end mobile phones was quite good, in terms of image precision and dynamic range, there was still a gap between them and the pan tilt camera. - ** Shooting Function **: - The pan/tilt camera often had more professional functions that were optimized for shooting. For example, the log color adjustment mode of DJJ's action4 could improve the video tolerance and color depth. - The camera function of the phone was more convenient and versatile for daily use. Some advanced camera functions were relatively weak or lacking. - ** Operation **: - The operation of the camera was mainly designed around the photography function. The operation interface and button layout were more in line with the logic of photography. - The mobile phone had many functions, and the shooting operation was only one of them. The complexity and convenience of the operation varied with the mobile phone system and design. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
Is it better for a novice to use a micro camera or a DSLR camera?
For beginners, choosing a micro or DSLR could be considered from the following aspects: ** 1. Portability ** The microphone was usually more advantageous than the DSLR in terms of size and weight. Its body was smaller and lighter, and the size of the lens was gradually decreasing. If a novice often needed to bring a camera out, such as traveling or sweeping the streets, a micro-camera might be more suitable and would not bring too much weight. ** 2. Ease of operation ** 1. The micro-camera used an electronic viewfinder and did not have the reflective plate and pentaprism structure of a DSLR. This made it possible for the micro-camera to perform better in terms of shutter speed and continuous shooting speed, and it might be easier to operate when shooting dynamic scenes. 2. However, the microphone might not be able to use the shortcut buttons to quickly adjust some parameters like the DSLR. ** 3. Picture quality ** Both could provide better picture quality. The micro-camera used the same sensor as the single-lens reflex camera, which could achieve the image quality similar to the single-lens reflex camera. ** 4. In terms of camera group ** DSLR had a long history of development, and its lens group was often richer. If the novice had high requirements for the choice and compatibility of the lens, the DSLR might be a better choice. However, with the development of micro-camera technology, the number of shots was also increasing. ** 5. Scenery ** 1. The DSLR used optical framing, which did not consume the camera's power during the framing process. Even if the camera was out of battery, the image could be seen through the viewfinder. The micro-camera used electronic viewfinder, and the viewfinder would not work when there was no battery. 2. The image seen through the optical viewfinder of the DSLR was not the final shot. To see the final effect, one needed to use the exposure previews or view the scene from the display screen. The micro-single camera directly displayed the image on the display screen through the sensor, which was closer to the final shot effect. ** 6. Video Shooting ** The performance of the micro-camera was usually better than that of the DSLR in terms of video shooting, such as the ability to focus, video specifications, etc. If a newbie had more video shooting needs, a micro-single might be more suitable. ** 7. Price ** In recent years, the cost of entry-level products for micro-cameras had decreased, and the price had also fallen further. Relatively speaking, the price-performance ratio might be higher. In general, there were advantages and disadvantages to both a micro camera and a DSLR. Newbies could choose a micro camera or a DSLR according to their specific needs, such as its maneuverability, operating habits, and shooting content. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
Huawei mobile phone micro-business waterproof camera download
You can download the Weishang Watermark camera by clicking on the article link (the specific link location is not specified in the information provided, so it cannot be accurately provided), or you can search for "Weishang Watermark camera"(now renamed Weimai Watermark) in the mobile application store to download it. The official Android version is the v5.5.16 version released on September 8, 2024. The software size is 193.9M. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
A good phone with a DSLR camera
He recommended a few good novels. 'Magical Camera', an urban supernatural novel that was plain but actually created. The protagonist had a magical camera that could turn photos into real objects. The early stages were slow, but the later parts of the story were not bad. The urban parts were also quite realistic. " My Staff Is Inhumane " was an urban supernatural novel written by Guo Shui. The story became interesting from the time he inherited the massage shop. Guo Shui's transformation was worth looking forward to. " Super Divine Phone " was a novel about supernatural powers and urban supernatural powers created by Night Walker. A loser college student, a nine-handed counterfeit phone, and a future smart elf were put together to start a super divine life. " A Happy Life Begins from Film and Television " was a novel about urban life in the form of a little white wolf. The protagonist traveled through the film and television world to change the fate of the female protagonist and gain happiness. " My Time Travel Phone " was a novel by the Golden Jasmine Flower. The protagonist's phone was switched and he started to travel through time and space. Although there were some small flaws, it was not bad overall. It was a masterpiece in a time-travel novel. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
A mobile phone with a DSLR resolution
The following cell phones had an image quality similar to that of a DSLR: 1. ** Huawei P50 Pro**: It is equipped with four cameras, including a 50-million-pel main camera, 13-million-wide angle camera, 64-million-telephoto camera, and 40-million-black and white sensor. 2. ** Glory 100**: Rear-mounted 50-million-pel single-lens reflex photo camera +12-million-pel ultra-wide-angle macro lens. The main camera has a sony imx906 large base sensor and OIS optical image stabilization. It supports natural blurring and hdr-based light and shadow algorithms. The image has layers and three-dimensional light and shadow. The front main camera has 50-million-pel. Self-portraits have a single-lens reflex texture. 3. ** Vivo S18**: The rear camera uses a 50-million-pel main camera and an 8-million-pel super wide-angle lens. The main camera has a large bottom sensor, OIS super anti-shake and VCS human eye bionic technology. The picture is clean and transparent. The front camera also has a 50-million-pel high-definition lens, which has good image quality. 4. **Oppo Reno 11**: The rear has a 50-million-pel main camera, an 8-million-pel ultra-wide-angle lens, and a 32-million-pel portrait telephoto lens. The main camera supports the large base of the Sony-Lyt 600, OIS optical image stabilization, and the flagship algorithm. It covers multiple focal lengths and is supported by a super-light image engine. The image quality is comparable to that of a single-lens reflex. The front has a 32-million-pel high-definition lens, making the selfie three-dimensional and natural. 5. ** True Self 12 Pro+**: The lowest price is 1447 yuan (8GB +256GB). It is a mobile phone that focuses on video among the thousand yuan phones. It has the strength of the flagship video and has a periscope telephoto lens. 6. [Nubian Mavericks NX302J: This is a 100-yuan phone with a 100-million-pel professional single-lens reflex camera.] <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
Mobile phones and micro cameras and DSLR cameras
The basic principle of a single-lens reflex camera was that the light reflected by the object entered the camera through the lens, reflected by the reflective plate to the pentaprism, and then refracted to the viewfinder. When shooting, the mirror popped up, the lens aperture contracted, the shutter opened to expose the film, and after the exposure, all parts were reset. It had the characteristics of optical framing, no electricity, and no delay. However, when shooting video, the mirror needed to be lifted for electronic framing. The micro-camera was a mirrorless camera that could change lenses. Through electronic viewfinder, light could be projected directly onto the image sensor. The image could be observed through the display or viewfinder. It was not a castrated version of the DSLR. The two were digital cameras with different structures. In terms of mobile phones, video flagship phones such as the Vivo X100 Pro, OOppo Find X7 Ultra, and Glory Magic6 Pro claimed to be comparable to the image quality of the DSLR, but the camera manufacturer did not respond. There were certain developments in mobile phone imaging. For example, the Vivo had a 1-inch main camera and a telephoto hanging sun technology; the Oppo had a lot of materials, and the rear four cameras had good quality; the Glory Magic6 Pro used a variable aperture and a large base telephoto. However, even if there was less room for improvement in the image quality of the phone's LCD camera, the micro-camera had new development points in terms of the lens, such as smaller, larger aperture, more accurate focusing, and so on. Moreover, the micro-camera also had the advantage of lens group, so there was still a big gap between the mobile phone and the micro-camera. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
Video tutorial with DSLR and mobile phone
** 1. Video tutorial on cell phone shooting ** 1. ** Basic operation settings ** - It is usually recommended to use 1080P 60fps settings to shoot videos. This resolution was clear enough to be viewed on a mobile phone without taking up too much memory. The 60fps frame count made the video smoother, and there was more room for adjustment during post-editing. - The iPhone could be set up in the homepage settings under [camera]-[record video]. - To enter the camera's video/recording mode for an Android phone, click the settings button on the upper right corner to enter the resolution setting option to set the resolution and video frame count. For some older models or Android phones with poor video functions, the default is 1080P 30fps, which can be left unadjusted. 2. ** Shooting Techniques ** - In terms of holding the camera, you should hold the camera steadily with both hands when shooting; when shooting moving camera videos, you should ensure that your footsteps and body posture are stable, and try to move at a constant speed for shooting; if you can't hold it steadily, you can use a tripod or a stabiliser to assist in shooting. - In terms of operating the lens, it was crucial to master the four basic lens operating techniques. Pushing forward meant moving the camera forward with the phone; zooming out meant moving the camera backward; shaking the camera meant that the camera position basically did not move, and the shooting angle turned from the left to the right of the picture; moving the camera included moving left and right, up and down, following the camera, and many other methods, which could reflect the dynamic image. 3. ** Post-editing software recommendation ** - [VUE-suitable for novices. Simple editing interface and functions.] - [Cut: Full and rich editing functions. Free without watermarks. Sound effects, masks, curve speed changes, and other functions are good. It's suitable for beginners to learn advanced editing.] - [Qiaoying: The editing interface is more professional and has powerful functions. It is suitable for advanced editing, but you need to pay to remove the watermarks.] - [videoeap]: For iPhone users, it has many advanced functions, such as masks, keyframes, and color keys. It is suitable for iPhone users to learn advanced editing. 4. ** Techniques of combining shooting and transition ** - [Obscure transition: You need to shoot two segments of video material. The first segment ends with an obstruction, and the second segment begins with an obstruction.] - [Transferring Mirror in the Same Direction: Transferring mirrors in the same direction or between similar characters can be achieved naturally.] ** 2. DSLR Video Shooting Tutelage (Take Material 5 as an example)** 1. ** Shooting method and parameters setting ** - For example, in the surround lens shooting mode, the focus mode could be set to PM, the aperture value could be set to F8 - F16, and the sensitivity could be set to 100 - 800. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
Pentax DSLR with mobile phone software
The official version of the Camera Connect Control was a software that could connect a Pentax DSLR to a mobile phone. It could be connected via USB or Wi-Fi to remotely control the camera and transfer photos. Pentax had also released an ADC for its own single-lens reflex camera. Third-party developers could use this to develop an App that allowed a phone, tablet, or computer to control the camera using a USB cable or a Wi-Fi connection. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
Mobile phone photography and DSLR photography
There were many differences between cell phone photography and DSLR photography: ** 1. In terms of hardware ** 1. ** Shot ** - DSLR had the huge advantage of being able to change lenses. By using lenses with different focal lengths, such as wide-angle, telephoto, macro, etc., they could take photos with different effects to satisfy more personal shooting ideas. For example, when shooting scenery, the wide-angle lens could accommodate a wider scene, and when shooting close-ups, the macro lens could show the details of the microscopic world. - Although mobile phone lenses had multi-camera combinations such as main camera, ultra-wide angle, telephoto, and so on, there was still a gap in the flexibility and professionalism of the focal length compared to the DSLR lens. Moreover, it could not be freely changed to meet special shooting needs like the DSLR lens. 2. ** Light-sensitive element ** - The size of the sensor of the DSLR was larger, which allowed it to better control noise at high sensitivity and capture light better. In dark environments, such as night scenes, it could take photos with better quality and richer details. - The light-sensitive element of the mobile phone was relatively small, and it was easy to produce more noise under high sensitivity. The ability to shoot in dark light was limited, but the mobile phone manufacturer made up for this deficiency to a certain extent through algorithm optimization. 3. ** Control of shooting parameters ** - DSLR cameras could manually and precisely control the aperture, shutter, sensitivity, white balance, and many other parameters. For example, by adjusting the aperture size, you can control the depth of field and achieve the effect of background blurring. By adjusting the shutter speed, you can capture different instantaneous effects of moving objects, such as a high-speed shutter freezing the moment of movement, a slow shutter shooting the light track, and so on. - Although cell phones also had a professional mode, which could adjust some parameters such as sensitivity and shutter speed, the flexibility and accuracy of operation were not as good as that of a single-lens reflex camera. Moreover, many users relied more on the automatic shooting mode of the cell phone in their daily use. ** 2. In terms of shooting convenience ** 1. ** Volume and Portableness ** - The mobile phone was small and light. It was an item that people carried with them on a daily basis. It could be used to take photos anytime and anywhere. It was very suitable for capturing moments in life. - DSLR cameras were relatively large, heavy, and inconvenient to carry. They needed special camera bags and other equipment. They might miss some shooting opportunities because they were not portable. 2. ** Ease of operation ** - The cell phone was easy to operate and highly automated. For a novice photographer, he only needed to turn on the camera and press the shutter at the subject. The camera would automatically complete the measurement, focus, exposure, and other operations. Moreover, the camera function of the phone integrated many intelligent algorithms, such as beauty, scene recognition, etc., which could quickly get good photos. - The operation of a DSLR camera was relatively complicated and required a certain amount of learning costs. It required mastering the settings of various parameters and the use of function buttons, but its advantage was that it could be customized according to the photographer's creativity. 3. ** Post-processing ** - Mobile photography came with a lot of convenient post-production functions, such as filter, crop, color matching, etc. After shooting, you could immediately perform simple post-processing and share. Some phones also used software algorithms to perform deep optimization, such as computational optical to improve the quality of photos. - The post-production work after the shooting of the DSLR mainly relied on computer software, such as Adobe Photoshop, etc. The operation was relatively complicated, but it could carry out more detailed and professional post-processing. ** 3. In terms of shooting effects ** 1. ** Picture Quality and resolution ** - The photos taken by the single-lens reflex camera had a high level of image quality, resolution, color reproduction, and so on. Especially when the output was large, it could show more delicate details and more accurate colors. - Although cell phone photography was constantly improving in terms of the number of resolution, the overall picture quality was still inferior to that of a DSLR camera. When zooming in to see the details of the photo, it was easy to have problems such as blurriness and noise. 2. ** The artistry and atmosphere of the photos ** - When using traditional equipment such as old lenses, the photos taken by the single-lens reflex camera often had a unique texture, atmosphere, and light sense, such as film feeling, oily feeling, etc. This feeling was the result of the optical characteristics of the lens, the internal structure of the camera, and other factors. - Due to the optimization of the algorithm and other reasons, mobile photography photos were often clearer and sharper. To a certain extent, it lost the artistic sense and atmosphere of traditional photography and pursued more to restore the real scene. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>