Rules for the Assessment and Scoring of Accountants in Public Institution
The following are the detailed rules of the accounting assessment and scoring standards for public institutions:
1. ** Basic Finance Work **
- ** Financial institution construction (3 points)**: To establish a sound financial institution, set up accounting and cashier positions; financial personnel should take up their posts with accounting certificates; financial personnel transfer or resignation should be reported to the Human Resources Society and the financial department for review and filing, which can be recorded as 3 points. Deduct 2 points if there are no separate posts.
- ** Continuing education for financial personnel (2 points)**: Financial personnel should attend the continuing education for accounting on time. If they fail to complete the continuing education on time, 1 point will be deducted for each person.
- ** Accountant Information (15 points)**
- ** Original certificate (4 points)**: Original certificate content is complete, procedures are complete, 4 points. 0.5 points will be deducted from each document if the contents of the certificate elements are incomplete, and the procedures of the person handling, the certifiers, and the approvers are incomplete.
- ** Bookkeeping voucher (3 points)**: The bookkeeping voucher has complete elements and is filled in properly. 3 points. If the elements of the certificate are incomplete, and the attachment, content, and amount are inconsistent with the original certificate attached, 1 point will be deducted for each document. If the filling is not standard, the points will be deducted as appropriate.
- ** reconciliation (3 points)**: Regular reconciliation of multiple accounts to ensure that the indicators, plans, funds, etc. are consistent with the accounts and the accounts are consistent with the actual accounts. 3 points will be recorded. If they are inconsistent, 1 point will be deducted for each transaction.
- ** Financial Report (3 points)**: Submit financial reports and relevant financial information that needs to be submitted on a monthly basis. Complete the project, complete the content, and submit it in a timely manner. 3 points. 2 points will be deducted for failing to prepare the report on schedule, and 1 point will be deducted for failing to submit the report according to the regulations.
- ** Filing of accounting data (2 points)**: The accounting documents, account books, accounting statements, and other financial data are regularly sorted, filed, and filed according to regulations. 2 points are awarded. Those who do not collect, sort out, and file regularly will not be scored.
- ** Financial system (10 points)**: 2 points for establishing and perfecting the financial system of the unit according to the regulations; 6 points for not establishing the financial system; points for incomplete and incomplete systems.
- ** Internal audit organization (10 points)**: Set up an internal audit organization, organize an internal audit every six months, issue an internal audit report, and publicly publicize the internal audit situation. 10 points. Those who did not carry out the internal review would not be scored, 5 points would be deducted for one less time, and 3 points would be deducted for failing to publicize it according to the regulations.
2. ** Non-tax revenue management (10 points)**: Strictly implement the non-tax revenue management system to ensure the safety of the ticket payment, 10 points will be recorded; if you violate the regulations to use the ticket or use, intercept or transfer the non-tax revenue, you will not be recorded.
3. ** Government procurement management (5 points)**: 5 points will be deducted for strictly implementing the regulations on government procurement and bidding. 5 points will be deducted for each violation. Negative points will be awarded for this item.
4. ** Financial investment management (5 points)**: Strictly implement the capital construction review and key project fund management system, 5 points will be recorded, 5 points will be deducted for each violation, and negative points will be obtained for this item.
5. ** Old-age insurance (5 points)**: Pay the social pension insurance in full and on time according to the regulations, 5 points will be deducted. If you don't pay according to the regulations, you will be deducted.
In addition, in terms of accounting institutions and accounting personnel (20 points):
1. ** Institution and Staffing (20 points)**
- ** Personnel Qualification (Multiple Deductions)**: Set up an accounting agency in accordance with the provisions of the <
Assessment of the Director of the Public Institution Office
The following are some of the key points of the performance assessment of the office director of an institution: ** 1. Business (80 points)** 1. ** System construction and document review (the weight depends on the specific situation)** - To be responsible for the formulation, supervision and implementation of internal administrative rules and regulations. If there was a mistake in this area, such as an unreasonable system affecting the work process or not effectively supervising the implementation, points would be deducted. Checking the documents and notices drafted by other departments in the name of the unit. If there are mistakes (such as mistakes in the documents due to careless checking), 2 points will be deducted each time. 2. ** Coordinated work (the weight depends on the specific situation)** - Assist the leader to coordinate the various departments and promote the standard and management of work. If the coordination is not in place, causing conflicts between departments or poor work connection, 1 point will be deducted for each mistake. 3. ** Meeting organization and execution (weight points are determined according to specific circumstances)** - The specific arrangements for the administrative meeting needed to be recorded. Urge, investigate and implement the matters decided in the meetings and documents, and check the implementation of the decisions made in the meetings. In these links, if there are loopholes in the meeting arrangement (such as time conflicts, missing notices of participants, etc.), the meeting minutes are incomplete and accurate, and the follow-up of the meeting decisions is not good enough, 2 points will be deducted each time. 4. ** Planning and reporting work (the weight is determined according to the specific situation)** - To organize the formulation of the annual and monthly plans of the unit and submit various external reports on time. If the plan is unreasonable and affects the work, or the report is not submitted in time or there are errors, 2 points will be deducted each time. 5. ** Staff training and ideology work (the weight is determined according to the specific situation)** - Do a good job in the department's business training to improve the quality of employees, organize the department's employees to learn business, and do a good job in coordination, thinking, and confidentiality. If the employee training fails to achieve the expected effect (such as the training content is not practical, the training plan is not implemented, etc.), or there are mistakes such as negligence in the confidentiality work, 1 point will be deducted each time. 6. ** Task assigned by the leader (weight depends on the specific situation)** - Complete other tasks assigned by the unit leader. If you fail to complete them properly, one point will be deducted each time. ** 2. Other aspects that may be involved ** 1. ** Written materials and review (has a certain weight in the overall assessment)** - Although he didn't have to personally write every piece of material, he needed to have the ability to review important materials (especially materials that involved the head of the company reading them in person). If there are problems with the materials due to the lack of strict review (such as errors in content, improper presentation, etc.), it will affect the performance evaluation. 2. ** Decision-making Advisor (Has a certain weight in the overall assessment)** - Assist unit leaders in planning major decisions and provide valuable references in a timely manner. If the decision-making reference provided lacks accuracy and comprehensiveness, it may affect the assessment results. 3. ** represents contact and service (if applicable, has a certain weight in the overall assessment)** - To strengthen contact with representatives, organize representative learning and training, carry out representative activities, and supervise the suggestions and opinions of representatives. If there are problems in the representative service work (such as the chaotic organization of representative activities, the lack of supervision of representative suggestions, etc.), it will have a negative impact on the assessment. 4. ** Letter reporting work (if applicable, it will have a certain weight in the overall assessment)** - If the unit involved in the petition work, the office director would bear certain responsibilities in regulating the procedures for handling the petition reception. If there were problems in the petition work (such as the petition was not handled in time, did not conform to the procedures, etc.), it would also affect the assessment. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
Reverse template of assessment form for public institution
The reverse side of the annual assessment registration form for public institution staff generally includes the following contents: personal summary signature (stamp) and date; supervisor's comments and assessment grade suggestions, signature (stamp) and date; signature (stamp) and date of the opinions of the person in charge of the agency or the assessment committee; signature and date of the opinions of the person in charge; stamp or signature and date of the undetermined grade or non-participation in the assessment. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
Assessment Results of Zibo City 2021 Public Institution
Zibo City Supervision and Law Enforcement Bureau was rated as Excellent in the performance appraisal results of municipal institutions in 2021, and has won this honor for five consecutive years since 2017; Zibo City college was rated as "Excellent" in the performance appraisal results of municipal institutions in 2021. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
Annual Assessment of Dismissal of Public Institution Personnel
If the staff of a public institution has been demoted or dismissed, and their positions have been adjusted according to regulations and the annual assessment has been determined to be unqualified, they will no longer be dealt with repeatedly on the grounds of failing the annual assessment. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
Public institution environmental impact assessment interview questions
The following are some questions that may arise during an environmental impact assessment interview: ** I. Principle and process of environmental impact assessment ** 1. What is the basic principle of environmental impact assessment? - Through systematic research and comprehensive evaluation, environmental impact assessment was used to predict and assess the impact of planning, construction, transformation, and the formulation of policies, plans, or programs on the environment. 2. Please elaborate on the process of environmental impact assessment. - The process included problem identification, basic data collection, environmental quality assessment, environmental impact prediction, environmental impact assessment, environmental protection countermeasures and plans, environmental management and supervision, etc. ** II. In terms of roles and responsibilities in the environmental impact assessment project ** 1. What role will you play in the environmental impact assessment project? What are your main responsibilities? - He might play the role of an environmental assessment expert or appraiser. The main responsibilities include collecting and analyzing basic information, conducting environmental impact assessments and predictions, proposing environmental protection countermeasures and suggestions, writing environmental impact assessment reports, and supervising the implementation process of environmental impact assessment projects. ** III. Methods and Techniques of the environmental impact assessment ** 1. What methods and techniques do you usually use when conducting an environmental impact assessment? - The environmental quality assessment will be used to assess the impact of the project on the environmental quality of the atmosphere, water, soil, noise, etc. through means such as samplings, field investigations, and monitoring. ** IV. Understanding of relevant policies and regulations on environmental impact assessment ** 1. How does the country manage the environmental impact assessment of construction projects? - According to the degree of impact of construction projects on the environment, the state implements classified management of the environmental impact assessment of construction projects. Construction projects that are included in the classified management list of environmental impact assessment of construction projects need to go through the environmental impact assessment procedures, while construction projects that are not included in the list do not need to go through the environmental impact assessment procedures. ** 5. Overall Quality and Ability ** 1. How to improve the quality of the environmental impact assessment report? - You can answer questions from aspects such as ensuring the comprehensiveness and accuracy of data collection, adopting scientific and reasonable evaluation methods, and writing in strict accordance with relevant policies and regulations. 2. If you encounter a situation where the company does not cooperate with you to provide information during the environmental impact assessment process, how will you deal with it? - From the perspective of communication and coordination, for example, explaining the importance of the environmental impact assessment work, its legitimacy, and its significance to the long-term development of the company. At the same time, he could also mention that he could use the power of the relevant departments to promote the work when necessary. 3. How to deal with the differences of opinions between team members when working together to complete the environmental impact assessment project? - They had to be based on scientific evidence, fully respect the opinions of each member, and reach a consensus through active discussion and comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of different plans. If the disagreement is too big to resolve, you can seek the opinions of external experts or higher-ups. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
Can a public institution participate in the assessment without a fixed grade?
If the year-end assessment of the staff of a public institution has not been graded, there may be the following situations: First, the assessment personnel are in the probationary period; second, the assessment personnel have committed illegal and criminal acts and are in the investigation stage; third, the assessment personnel have not received the administrative punishment period. Under these circumstances, although the level was not determined, under the corresponding circumstances, it was only an uncertain level to participate in the assessment. If the professional and technical position has not been determined, the information does not indicate the relationship between it and whether it can participate in the assessment, and it is not clear whether it can participate in the assessment. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
Comprehensive Assessment of Institution
The comprehensive evaluation of public institutions was an evaluation of various aspects of the personnel management work of public institutions. The assessment mainly revolved around the establishment and operation of the post management system, employment system, open recruitment system, assessment and reward system, personnel training system, salary and welfare system, professional title work system, social insurance system, and other relevant personnel management systems. The evaluation method was in accordance with the relevant notification requirements, such as the unit's independent evaluation, the competent department's review, the third-party evaluation, the comprehensive score, and the written feedback. For example, in the evaluation of Huiji District, the public institutions first carried out independent evaluation according to the evaluation content and indicators, and sorted out and improved the relevant personnel system construction and management work. The competent department guided and supervised the self-evaluation work and reviewed the results. After that, the Human Resources and Social Security Bureau of Huiji District transferred personnel to form an evaluation team to conduct spot checks, evaluation and scoring, and carried out the work in the form of consulting materials, checking files, investigating and talking. Through comprehensive evaluation, one could accurately grasp the implementation of the personnel system of public institutions and improve the level of personnel management in public institutions. At the same time, the evaluated unit could make improvements within a time limit according to the list of problems in the evaluation results. The competent department would establish a ledger for the evaluation ranking and existing problems of the affiliated institutions and make dynamic adjustments according to the improvement situation, constantly improving the personnel management system. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
kindergarten assessment scoring form
There were many types of kindergarten assessment scoring forms, such as the kindergarten teacher's quantitative assessment scoring form. For hygiene (10 points), there was a detailed grading standard for such forms: - Class hygiene: - In terms of floor hygiene, 1 - 2 points would be deducted based on the amount of paper scraps, dust, and garbage. - If the doors, windows, glass, tables, chairs, and electrical appliances were not clean, 1 - 2 points would be deducted for each area. - If there are paper scraps, peels, sundries, and sewage in the sanitary area, 1 - 2 points will be deducted depending on the situation. - Deduct 1 - 2 points for the disorderly placement of tables, chairs, toys, teaching aids, daily necessities, and sanitary tools in the class. In addition, there was also the kindergarten rating. Evaluation forms and other assessment forms might cover administrative management, daily teaching, nursing and hygiene, safety management, parents 'homes, logistics and meals, financial management, facilities and equipment, plans, observation records, and many other aspects of assessment content. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
Why is the assessment form of a public institution turned into a front and back page?
If you use the electronic version of the public institution assessment form, you have to print both sides of it on a piece of paper (A4 paper) to form a front and back page. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>
Binzhou Institution Assessment Award
The reference materials showed that Binzhou City had effectively used the assessment results of public institutions. For example, in 2017, the Municipal Examination Committee had increased the proportion of "excellent" grades in the annual assessment of public institutions with A-grade assessment results by 5% on the basis of national regulations, and issued 1.055 million yuan in reward funds. In 2023, Boxing County started the assessment of public institutions. The assessment grades were reported to the county public institution assessment committee for research and determination before being publicly announced to the public, but no specific reward content was mentioned. In 2024, Huimin County completed the assessment of 276 institutions in the county, and identified 110 excellent sub-institutions and 166 good sub-institutions, but did not explicitly mention the relevant information of the assessment award. According to the situation of Binzhou Development and reform commission, its affiliated institutions won the "Excellent" rank in the 2023 annual assessment, but it did not mention whether there was a specific assessment award for institutions with "Excellent" results. On the whole, at present, only Binzhou City's assessment of A-level institutions in 2017 could be obtained. Although there were assessment results in other years, it was impossible to determine whether there was an assessment award and the specific content of the assessment award. <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>