I think you should first observe how others interact with your advisor. If most people use the first name, it might be acceptable for you too. However, if there's a sense of formality, it's better to err on the side of caution and use a title.
Well, it's a tricky question. You might want to consider your advisor's personality and the general atmosphere in your department. If it's a very informal setting, calling by the first name could be okay. But if it's more traditional, stick to a more respectful title.
It depends. In some PhD programs and academic cultures, it's okay, but in others, it might be seen as disrespectful.
It could bring fresh perspectives and new challenges. Maybe the advisor has a unique approach or offers different research directions.
Maybe it's because your advisor is really helpful and supportive. They could give great advice and make your academic journey smoother.
One horror story is when my phd advisor kept changing the research goals randomly. It was so frustrating as I had already made progress in one direction, and then had to start anew. It felt like I was running in circles without any real guidance.
One common element is lack of communication. Advisors might not respond to students' inquiries promptly, leaving the students in limbo. Another is unrealistic expectations, like expecting a phd student to complete an impossible amount of work in a short time.
I don't know the exact first name. You might need to search specific sources for that info.
It's hard to say for sure. Sometimes it's difficult to keep track of whether it's on hiatus or not. You could look for announcements from the creators or in relevant comic forums.
I think it's over. There haven't been any new releases or announcements of continuation for a long time.
Maybe the creator is taking a break or facing some creative blocks. It could also be due to external factors like scheduling conflicts or changes in priorities.
Phd Comics often humorously depict the challenges and experiences of graduate students and academia.