Yes, you can save stories on NY Times online. When you visit the NY Times website, look for options like bookmarking or adding to a reading list. This can be really useful if you come across an interesting article but don't have time to read it right away. You can then access your saved stories at a later time when it's more convenient for you. Also, if you subscribe to the NY Times, there might be additional features related to saving and organizing your favourite stories.
Well, it depends. If the NY Times offers a save feature, usually you can save stories for later reading. This could be through a registered user account. However, I'm not entirely sure if all types of stories can be saved. Some might be restricted due to copyright or other reasons. Maybe they are only available to be saved for a limited time.
Look for a 'Save' or 'Bookmark' button on the page of the story. If it's there, just click it.
I'm not sure if it can be easily found online with just this title. It's very unclear and might not be a common search term. You could try searching for individual words like 'New York Times', 'Cleveland', and 'NASA' along with some related keywords to see if you can find relevant stories.
Another theme might be the history and heritage. Cemeteries often hold a lot of historical and cultural information. So, the stories in 'ny times 2019 cemetery stories' might be about the historical significance of cemeteries in that year, like old burial traditions. Also, the connection between the living and the dead can be a theme, as cemeteries are the link between the two in a way.
Yes, they are. They show real - life examples of love, which can inspire readers to believe in love and pursue their own relationships. The stories of how people find love against all odds can be very motivating.
One example could be some of its reporting on certain political events where the facts were later found to be misrepresented. For instance, in a story about a policy implementation, they might have exaggerated the negative impacts without fully considering all the aspects and data available at the time.
There are some who think that the NYT's coverage of political campaigns contains 'fake stories'. For instance, during an election, if a story is published about a candidate's past actions that doesn't align with the way a particular group wants to view the candidate. But in reality, the NYT is reporting based on sources and evidence. They may not always get it 100% right, but it's not fair to simply label it as 'fake'.
The 'ny times 2019 cemetery stories' might feature stories about cemetery maintenance and the people who take care of cemeteries. There could be accounts of restoration projects of old graves in 2019. It may also include stories of how cemeteries are used for remembrance and as a place for the community to gather, perhaps for commemorative events in that year.
Sorry, I can't summarize it without reading it. But it may summarize the key events in a lottery like the winning numbers, the big winner's story etc.
Look for lack of multiple reliable sources. If a story in the NY Times is based on just one or two sketchy sources, it could be false. For example, if it's a big expose but only quotes anonymous sources that can't be verified.
Yes. For instance, the story of an athlete who uses their platform to promote social change is inspiring. They might be advocating for equality in sports, regardless of gender or race, and through their actions, they are making a real difference both in the sports world and in society at large.