Often in such stories, they might be people who knew each other, like former lovers or acquaintances. It could be that they had some sort of relationship that turned sour. But again, without more details, we can only speculate. They could also be strangers who had a sudden and violent encounter for reasons unknown.
Since not much information is given in the title, it's impossible to know exactly who the girl and the guy were. They could be just ordinary people who got caught up in a very bad situation.
There could be many reasons behind such a violent act. It might be due to a long - standing feud, or perhaps in a fit of rage or self - defense gone wrong. Without more details about the story, it's hard to say exactly what led to it.
If it's a corporate - related wiretapping story in the 'ny times wiretapping story', then the companies involved would be the main parties. For example, a competing company might be wiretapping another to gain an edge in the market. Also, if there were victims of the wiretapping, like employees or other businesses, they would also be key parties.
Since I don't know the exact story, it could be the government agencies and the targets of wiretapping. Maybe the NSA (National Security Agency) if it was a case related to national security wiretapping.
In the 'chatterjee vs norway true story', the obvious main parties are Chatterjee and Norway. Chatterjee could be a person with a particular cause or situation. Norway, as a country, has its own laws, regulations, and governance systems that are involved in this situation. It's possible that Chatterjee might be a foreign national in Norway, or could have some other connection to the country that led to this 'vs' situation.
For the surrogate mothers, it can be extremely stressful. They have to carry a child not for themselves but for others, which can take a toll on their mental health. The intended parents, on the other hand, may face disappointment if things don't go as planned, like if the surrogate mother changes her mind. And for the children born through surrogacy, they may face identity issues later in life, not fully understanding their origin story.
Without detailed knowledge of this true - story kidnapping in the Grand Canyon, we can only speculate. The victim could have been a family member of someone who had a feud with the kidnapper. Or the victim might have been a solo adventurer who was easy to target in the relatively unpopulated areas of the canyon. The kidnapper could have been a local criminal who knew the area well and thought they could get away with the crime in such a large and hard - to - patrol area like the Grand Canyon.
Typically, there was the girl who was the victim. And there were the people who locked her in the closet, which were likely her abusers, maybe family members or people in a position of power over her.
Typically, there is the girl who was held in the basement and the person who held her captive.
In the 'Girl in the Basement' true story, the main people involved were the young girl who was held captive and the perpetrator who committed this heinous act. The girl was an innocent victim, while the perpetrator was someone with a very dark side, who was able to create this situation of captivity and abuse in a place as private as a basement. There may also have been family members or neighbors who later became involved when the situation was discovered, but the core of the story is about these two main characters.
Typically, there was the girl who was the victim and her captor. But without more specific details about a particular case, it's hard to name the exact individuals.