It implies that there are downsides to school choice that are not often talked about. Maybe it's about the unequal distribution of resources among schools as a result of school choice.
It implies that school choice is not as perfect as it seems on the surface. There could be issues such as the overcrowding of popular schools and the under - enrollment of less - popular ones. This can lead to a waste of educational resources in some cases. Also, it might suggest that the system of school choice can create a sense of hierarchy among schools, which can have a negative impact on the self - esteem and motivation of students in the 'lower - tier' schools.
The 'School Choice The Other Side of the Story' could reveal a variety of things. It might expose the fact that while school choice gives the illusion of more freedom for parents and students, in reality, there are many factors at play. For instance, the financial aspect. Wealthier families may have more options and resources to take advantage of school choice, leaving poorer families at a disadvantage. Also, it could show how the competition among schools created by school choice may not always be in the best interest of students' overall development. Some schools may focus too much on attracting students through marketing rather than improving the actual quality of education.
In the Book of Songs,"On the side of the water","On the river" and "On the shore of the water" reflected the shift of space and implied the shift of love.
This statement is inappropriate and slanderous. Just because of such a title doesn't mean there is any truth. Everyone should be treated with respect, and we should not spread unfounded rumors about others, especially using such derogatory terms.
This could imply that the wife is showing an interest in other roosters if 'cocks' refers to male chickens in a farm - related or animal - behavior context. Maybe she is involved in some kind of poultry - related activity and is observing other roosters for breeding purposes or general interest in their behavior.
I'm not really sure. It's quite a confusing combination of words and phrases, and it's hard to make sense of it at first glance.
It implies that there are no more events or developments in the story. Everything has been told and concluded.
It implies that there is more to a story that has either been partially told or is known to some extent, and now one is asking about the remaining parts of that story.
It could imply that the story doesn't involve the typical elements of a war story like battles, military strategies, or soldiers in combat. Maybe it's a story about the aftermath of war, or a story set during war times but focusing on non - combat aspects such as the lives of civilians or the emotional turmoil of people far from the front lines.
It implies that the story or situation being referred to does not involve elements typical of a ghost story, such as apparitions, hauntings, or supernatural phenomena related to ghosts.
The statement 'this not a war story' might be used to set the expectations right from the start. It tells the audience that they should not expect the usual war - related themes such as patriotism in the face of enemy, military tactics, or the physical and mental traumas of soldiers. It could be a story set in a war - like situation but is actually about something more profound like the power of human kindness. For instance, a story could be set in a war - torn area but instead of focusing on the fighting, it focuses on how the local people help each other to survive and keep their humanity alive.