Definitely not common. 'Eviscerate' is a very strong and somewhat violent - sounding word, and when combined with 'in fiction' it creates a rather odd and not - often - used phrase. In normal communication, people tend to use more mild expressions when talking about fictional portrayals of others. This phrase seems more like something that a very angry or creative individual might come up with in a rather unique situation, rather than a common part of the English language.
Well, 'eviscerate' is a really strong word. In the context of 'in fiction', it might imply that the person is planning to create a fictional scenario where they completely dismantle or destroy the reputation or image of another person. For example, they could write a story where the character based on that person is shown in the worst possible light, with all their secrets and bad deeds exposed in a very vivid and perhaps cruel way. Maybe it's a form of revenge or just a creative way to express strong negative feelings about someone, but all within the boundaries of a fictional creation.
No. It's not a common expression at all. 'Smiting' is an archaic verb and combining it with 'thee' which is also archaic and then adding 'Pulp Fiction' which is a modern movie title makes it a very odd and unique statement that you wouldn't typically hear in normal conversation.
Definitely not. 'I double dog dare you' is a familiar phrase on its own in the context of dares among friends or in a playful setting. However, 'pulp fiction' is a movie title. Combining them like this is not a common expression at all. It seems more like a made - up or very niche statement.
Well, it could imply a threat or a promise of extreme action in a fictional setting related to a knight's tale. Maybe it's part of a battle scene or a dramatic encounter.
Hardly. Common expressions are more straightforward and widely known. This one is quite specific and not likely to be part of everyday language. It's a blend of a general insult ('bum') and a reference to a particular type of literature ('pulp fiction'), which makes it an odd and not - so - common statement.
No, it's not a common expression at all. Usually, we don't see oak directly associated with the description of pulp fiction in such a simple way.
Definitely not. 'Blessed is the righteous man' has a very specific religious or ethical tone, and 'pulp fiction' is related to a particular type of fictional literature. You don't often hear these two things combined in everyday language or even in most literary discussions.
I don't think it's common. Most people would be more straightforward in their criticism, like saying 'that pulp fiction is terrible'. 'Far from ok' is a bit more of an unusual way to phrase it.
No, it's not a very common expression. It seems like a rather unique or creative way to describe someone.
No, it's not a very common expression. It seems like a rather unique combination of phrases.