It's not a common expression at all. Most people would use either 'stranger than fiction' to describe a strange real - life event or 'no time for comedy' in a serious situation, but not this joined - up phrase. It might be something someone created specifically for a particular context rather than a widely - used idiom.
No, it's not a very common expression. It seems like a rather unique combination of phrases.
I don't think it's common. Usually, we might hear 'stranger than fiction' on its own or 'no time for comedy' separately, but this specific combination is not something you come across often.
Yes, it is. Stranger Than Fiction has many comedic elements and moments that make it fall under the comedy genre.
It could imply that there is no opportunity or moment for comedy in a situation that is even stranger than what one might find in fictional stories. Maybe it refers to a real - life scenario that is so outlandish that normal comedic elements don't seem to fit.
Yes, it is. Stranger Than Fiction has many comedic elements and moments that provide entertainment and laughs.
I'd say it's a comedy. The way the story unfolds and the interactions between the characters are filled with comical situations and witty dialogues.
It's not a common expression at all. Most people would be more specific when talking about novels in the future. For instance, they might mention a specific genre of novel they want to read next time, or talk about a goal related to novels like finishing a certain number of novels next time. This phrase is rather unclear compared to normal expressions used in relation to novels.
No, it's not a common expression at all. Usually, we don't see oak directly associated with the description of pulp fiction in such a simple way.
Definitely not common. 'Eviscerate' is a very strong and somewhat violent - sounding word, and when combined with 'in fiction' it creates a rather odd and not - often - used phrase. In normal communication, people tend to use more mild expressions when talking about fictional portrayals of others. This phrase seems more like something that a very angry or creative individual might come up with in a rather unique situation, rather than a common part of the English language.
No, it's not a very common expression. It seems like a rather unique or creative way to describe someone.
I don't think it's common. Most people would be more straightforward in their criticism, like saying 'that pulp fiction is terrible'. 'Far from ok' is a bit more of an unusual way to phrase it.
Definitely not. 'Blessed is the righteous man' has a very specific religious or ethical tone, and 'pulp fiction' is related to a particular type of fictional literature. You don't often hear these two things combined in everyday language or even in most literary discussions.