It implies that complexity economics presents a narrative that is distinct from traditional economic theories. It might involve different assumptions, models, or ways of looking at economic phenomena.
Complexity economics views economic systems as complex adaptive systems. So when it tells a very different story, it could mean that it doesn't follow the simplistic cause - and - effect relationships assumed in some mainstream economics. For example, it may consider how individual agents interact in non - linear ways and how emergent properties arise from these interactions, which is quite different from the more static and deterministic models in traditional economics.
One example is in the study of markets. While traditional economics might assume perfect competition and equilibrium, complexity economics could show how markets are in a state of constant flux with different agents having varying degrees of influence at different times.
It implies that each tale, whether it's a short fable or a long epic, has a story within it. Tales are vessels for stories, and this statement emphasizes the fundamental nature of tales as carriers of narrative.
It implies that leaders use stories as a tool. Stories can be used to inspire their followers, convey their vision, and make their ideas more relatable.
An avatar that tells your story usually represents a virtual character or image that conveys aspects of your experiences or personality.
It could imply that someone has the ability or role to share tales or narratives.
It implies that the side that wins a conflict or event often gets to shape how that event is remembered and recorded. For example, in a war, the victorious nation may write the history books in a way that highlights their own heroism and the justness of their cause, while downplaying the actions and motives of the defeated side.
Well, 'grams' might refer to grams of something, like grams of a substance in a scientific experiment. If it tells a story, it could be about the journey of that substance. For example, in a chemistry experiment, the grams of a reactant could tell the story of a chemical reaction. How much was there at the start, how it changed during the reaction, and what was left at the end.
It implies that each picture has the potential to convey a narrative. Just like a short story, a picture can capture a moment, an emotion, or a sequence of events within its frame.
This could mean that there is a consideration of different perspectives in telling the stories of Hamilton and Washington. Different people may emphasize different aspects of their lives. For example, some might focus on Hamilton's financial genius, while others on Washington's leadership. And it also could be about how these stories are passed down, whether accurately or with some biases. There are many ways to tell their stories, through books, documentaries, or oral traditions, and this phrase may be asking about those who are responsible for that storytelling.
In journalism, 'every case tells a story' implies that there is always a narrative behind every event or situation that journalists cover. For example, when reporting on a political scandal, there are the actions of the politicians, the reactions of the public, and the events that led to the discovery of the scandal. Journalists need to uncover this story. They have to dig into the details, interview the relevant people, and piece together the sequence of events. This helps them present a comprehensive and engaging story to their audience.