Regarding evidence in the Amity Horror true story, it's a complex matter. On one hand, the family described some rather strange phenomena. They talked about unexplained noises, strange smells, and feelings of dread. But when it comes to tangible evidence, it's lacking. There have been no recordings of clear paranormal activity that can't be dismissed as normal household sounds or drafts. The only 'evidence' really is the family's testimony, which may have been colored by their desire for attention or their own psychological states. In the scientific community, there is no evidence that supports the idea of a true 'horror' situation in that Amityville house as described in the story.
Well, the evidence in the Amity Horror true story is rather flimsy. The family reported a lot of strange things, like doors slamming and cold spots. However, when investigators looked into it, they couldn't find anything that couldn't be explained by normal means. For example, old houses can make noises as they settle. The so - called 'paranormal' evidence like apparitions was only seen by the family members, with no objective verification. So, in short, there's no real evidence that holds up to scientific scrutiny.
There is not much conclusive evidence. Some claim that there were physical changes in the house, like strange marks on the walls. But these could be easily explained by natural causes. Most of the 'evidence' is based on the family's accounts, which could be influenced by their state of mind or other factors. So, it's hard to say there is real, solid evidence.
The 'Amity Horror' true story is often associated with the Amityville Horror case. It involves a family who claimed to experience terrifying and paranormal events in their house in Amityville. There were reports of strange noises, apparitions, and an overall sense of malevolence in the home. The story became very famous and has been the subject of many books and movies.
The Amityville Horror is a well - known story. It involves the Lutz family who claimed to have experienced terrifying paranormal activities in their new home in Amityville. There were reports of strange noises, cold spots, and apparitions. However, some skeptics believe that it might have been a hoax or exaggerated for various reasons, like publicity or psychological factors.
The key elements include the alleged paranormal activities in the house. There were reports of cold spots which are often associated with spirits in many ghost stories. Also, the family's sense of being constantly watched and feeling an evil aura around them was a major part of it. And the strange noises that they couldn't explain, like the sound of footsteps when no one was there.
I'm not entirely sure which specific 'Amity Valley' you're referring to. There could be many places with that name or it could be a very specific local or fictional story. Without more context, it's difficult to tell the real story.
As of now, there is no conclusive evidence in the Bigfoot real story. There are only blurry photos, unconfirmed footprints, and eyewitness accounts which are not reliable enough scientifically.
There is very little evidence for the Holy Grail real story. The tales of the Grail are mainly part of medieval literature and religious folklore. While some might claim that certain ancient cups or vessels could be the Grail, there is no scientific or historical proof to back it up. It's more of a symbolic and mythical concept that has been passed down through the ages.
Yes, there is some evidence. There are early Welsh texts like the 'Annales Cambriae' that mention a figure who could be related to Arthur. Also, some archaeological finds in Britain might be linked to the time period when Arthur was supposed to have lived.
Most likely no. Since it seems to be part of a folklore or mythological story, there is usually no scientific evidence for such things. These stories are more about cultural beliefs and traditions.
There may be no real evidence for the 'Beast of Bangalore'. Legends like this tend to grow without any solid proof. It could be that people just like to tell spooky stories, and this one about the 'beast' is just another example. Maybe someone made up a story for fun, and others just ran with it without any factual basis.
Probably not much hard evidence. Most of these haunted stories are based on hearsay and personal accounts which can be unreliable.