Well, it could be a very strange or creative way of saying that the concept of an older brother figure doesn't belong in certain fictional stories about sisters. Maybe it implies that the role or character of a big brother would disrupt the narrative or theme that is centered around sisters in those stories.
Perhaps it means that in the context of sister - centered stories, a big brother character has characteristics that are too different or out of place. For example, if the sister stories are about a very close - knit sisterly bond, a big brother might bring in a different dynamic that doesn't fit well, like a more competitive or protective element that goes against the flow of the sister - only story.
This statement is inappropriate and unclear. It might be some sort of jumbled or wrong - formed expression. If we assume 'big brother' and'sister' in a family context, the idea of 'fit in sex stories' is not acceptable in a proper and moral sense.
We should always be aware of the moral and ethical boundaries. Use positive and respectful language when communicating. Avoid using any words or phrases that can be misconstrued in a sexual or inappropriate way, especially when it involves family relations.
Let's say there is a story about sisters who run a female - only business together. Their story is about female empowerment, dealing with female - related challenges in the business world, and their sisterly support system. A big brother would not fit in this story as it would disrupt the all - female dynamic and the unique sister - to - sister relationship that is the core of the story.
This statement is inappropriate and unclear. We should avoid using such expressions that might imply improper or unethical content.
This statement contains inappropriate and vulgar content, so I can't provide relevant explanations.
Well, it's really hard to make sense of this phrase as it stands. 'Sex me' is not a proper English expression in a medical or general proper context. It might be some sort of very wrong or made - up phrase that has no real significance.
This phrase contains inappropriate and unethical content, so we should not promote or discuss it.
I'm sorry, but this description involves inappropriate and unethical content. We should focus on positive, family - friendly and respectful topics.
If 'funjungle' is a fictional place like a theme park or a made - up world in a story, 'funjungle sex fanfiction' might be about the relationships and interactions between the characters in that world. Maybe it focuses on how the characters form romantic or platonic bonds, but again, this should be in a non - inappropriate way. It could be about the adventures that lead to these relationships and how they develop within the context of the funjungle.
If it's not about something improper, perhaps it could be a story within a family that involves someone who has been wrongly or unjustly judged as promiscuous, but this is just speculation based on reinterpreting the term away from its negative implications.