Definitely not. While in creative writing such as fantasy or science - fiction, bending the truth to create an exciting story is common. However, in fields where accuracy matters, like technical writing or historical research, this principle is completely wrong. In historical research, for instance, if you let go of the truth, you're distorting history. So it depends on the type of writing.
Yes, in the context of fiction. Fiction is a form of art and creativity. As long as it's clear that it's a fictional story, it's okay to not be strictly truthful. Writers are free to create worlds and characters that deviate from reality to make a great story.
Well, it could imply that a good story has its own value regardless of the truth. In some cases, like in fairy tales or legends, the story is more about entertainment and passing on certain cultural values rather than being strictly factual. So, we don't let the harsh or boring truth get in the way of a great narrative. For instance, in the story of Cinderella, there are magical elements that are clearly not true but make the story so much more appealing.
Well, it implies that a good story is more important than the truth in some cases. Take folk tales or legends, for instance. They are full of elements that may not be strictly true but are there to convey a moral or just to be an exciting story. People like to be entertained, and if the truth gets in the way of that entertainment, this saying suggests that the truth can be sacrificed for the sake of a great story.
In general, it's not a good principle for all types of writing. While in fictional storytelling, it can add an element of fun and creativity, in other areas it's unacceptable. Consider historical fiction. You can take some liberties with minor details to make the story flow better, but you can't completely distort historical facts. In contrast, in a research report, the facts are the foundation, and any deviation from them would render the work invalid. So, it's a principle that should be used very selectively.
One way is to be liberal with facts. For example, if you're writing a historical fiction, you can change some minor historical details to fit your plot better. Just make sure not to distort the overall essence of the era.
It means that in creative writing, sometimes strict adherence to facts can limit the imaginative and engaging aspects of a story. For example, a historical fiction writer might tweak some minor historical details to make the plot more exciting or to better fit the character arcs. It's about prioritizing the narrative's entertainment value over absolute truth.
It means that sometimes people prefer to stick to an interesting or fictional narrative rather than let the boring or inconvenient truth disrupt it. For example, in fictional stories, authors might take some liberties with historical facts to make the story more engaging.
The four aspects of the Truth of Suffering are: Impermanence, Suffering, Emptiness, and Non-Self. The so-called non-normal refers to the observation that all dharma is born by karma, and there are birth and death in every thought, but there is no eternal existence; Suffering is because there is coercion; Emptiness is because of false existence; Non-self means that there is no unique noumenon, that is, there is no substance. The novel " Dream of Silk Fate " is equally exciting. Everyone is welcome to click and read it!
In marketing and advertising, it means focusing on the story that sells the product rather than strict facts. For example, a beauty product might claim to give 'flawless skin' which is more of a story than a pure truth as no product can make everyone's skin truly flawless. But it makes for a good marketing story.
A bad writing style was a relatively subjective evaluation. Different people might have different opinions. Some people may think that their writing is good while others may think that their writing is not good enough. However, writing style was not the only factor that affected the quality of a novel. A good novel not only needed an attractive plot, but it also needed appropriate character creation, deep thinking about the theme, vivid narrative techniques, and so on. Therefore, even if a person's writing was not very good, they could still create excellent novels. The most important thing was to practice and improve his writing skills by reading other excellent novels and interacting with others.