Not really. It's not an everyday phrase you hear. It's more of an idiosyncratic way of expressing that someone doesn't fit the pulp fiction - ish profile. It could be something a film or literature buff might come up with, but not common in general conversation.
No, it's not a very common expression. It seems to be a rather specific statement that might be used in a particular context, like when discussing a person's character in relation to the themes of pulp fiction.
It's not common at all. Most people would not use this expression without a very specific reason related to pulp fiction and making a distinction about a person. It's a bit of a niche statement that would only be used in certain circles, like those who are really into the genre and its associated tropes.
No, it's not a very common expression. It seems like a rather unique or creative way to describe someone.
It could imply that 'he' is not the type of person associated with the characteristics often found in a pulp fiction context. Maybe he doesn't fit the mold of the edgy, often morally ambiguous characters that are common in pulp fiction.
No, it's not a common expression at all. Usually, we don't see oak directly associated with the description of pulp fiction in such a simple way.
No, it's not a common expression at all. It seems to be a very creative and unique combination of words.
No, it's not a common expression at all. I've never heard it used in normal, everyday English conversations.
Definitely not. 'Blessed is the righteous man' has a very specific religious or ethical tone, and 'pulp fiction' is related to a particular type of fictional literature. You don't often hear these two things combined in everyday language or even in most literary discussions.
I don't think it's common. Most people would be more straightforward in their criticism, like saying 'that pulp fiction is terrible'. 'Far from ok' is a bit more of an unusual way to phrase it.
Hardly. Common expressions are more straightforward and widely known. This one is quite specific and not likely to be part of everyday language. It's a blend of a general insult ('bum') and a reference to a particular type of literature ('pulp fiction'), which makes it an odd and not - so - common statement.
No. It's not a common expression at all. 'Smiting' is an archaic verb and combining it with 'thee' which is also archaic and then adding 'Pulp Fiction' which is a modern movie title makes it a very odd and unique statement that you wouldn't typically hear in normal conversation.
Hardly. When people talk about pulp fiction, they usually mention elements like the lurid covers, the action - packed stories, or the specific time period it was popular in. The phrase 'you can never can tell pulp fiction' is not a widespread or typical way to talk about this type of literature.