Typically, no. Genes are part of our genetic code and are influenced by things like inheritance, environmental factors, and random mutations. A kid isn't capable of causing harm to a gene in the sense of directly attacking or destroying it. While a kid's lifestyle choices in the future might influence gene expression, it's not the same as harming a gene in a traditional sense. So in a true story, it's very improbable.
In general, no. Genes are in the realm of molecular biology. A kid doesn't possess the means to cause harm to a gene in a true story. For instance, genes are stored in the nucleus of cells and are regulated by complex cellular mechanisms. A kid cannot access or manipulate these mechanisms to harm a gene. Also, genetic changes occur through natural processes over time or due to external factors that a kid doesn't control, like certain chemicals or radiation.
There is no such general situation in real life where a 'kid' can directly 'kill' a 'gene' in the literal sense. Genes are part of our biological makeup and can be affected by various factors like mutations, environmental influences, and diseases, but not by a kid in a murderous way.
I don't think so. Usually, such extreme and disturbing scenarios are rare in true stories involving kids.
No, Gene doesn't die. The story has a different outcome for him.
No, it's likely fictional. Most stories like this are made up for entertainment or to convey a certain message.
I'm not sure. It depends on which true story you're referring to. Maybe you could give me more details?
No, Gene doesn't get killed. The story has a different outcome for him.
Well, the circumstances of Gene's death in the true story could be quite complex. It might involve a combination of factors such as an accident, illness, or some other unforeseen event. But without more detailed information, it's hard to give a precise answer.
It depends on the specific circumstances of the story. Maybe there's a reason for Gene to do it, or maybe not.