Gene remains alive in the true story. It's a complex tale with multiple factors contributing to his continued existence.
No, Gene doesn't get killed. The story has a different outcome for him.
No, Gene doesn't die. The story has a different outcome for him.
No, it's likely fictional. Most stories like this are made up for entertainment or to convey a certain message.
I'm not sure. It depends on which true story you're referring to. Maybe you could give me more details?
Typically, no. Genes are part of our genetic code and are influenced by things like inheritance, environmental factors, and random mutations. A kid isn't capable of causing harm to a gene in the sense of directly attacking or destroying it. While a kid's lifestyle choices in the future might influence gene expression, it's not the same as harming a gene in a traditional sense. So in a true story, it's very improbable.
There is no such general situation in real life where a 'kid' can directly 'kill' a 'gene' in the literal sense. Genes are part of our biological makeup and can be affected by various factors like mutations, environmental influences, and diseases, but not by a kid in a murderous way.
Well, the circumstances of Gene's death in the true story could be quite complex. It might involve a combination of factors such as an accident, illness, or some other unforeseen event. But without more detailed information, it's hard to give a precise answer.
It depends on the specific circumstances of the story. Maybe there's a reason for Gene to do it, or maybe not.
I don't think so. Usually, such extreme and disturbing scenarios are rare in true stories involving kids.