Maybe they find science fiction too unrealistic. Some people prefer more down - to - earth genres and think that science fiction often involves concepts that are too far - fetched to be enjoyable.
They might say it because they think there's too much of it. The market could be flooded with science fiction books, movies, and shows, and they feel it's time for something new.
Another reason could be that they believe science fiction promotes certain values or ideas that they don't agree with. For instance, some science fiction might explore dystopian futures which could be seen as too negative or it might promote certain scientific ideas that go against someone's religious or ethical beliefs.
One reason could be that her works often use a contemporary or near - future setting. In contrast to traditional science fiction that might be set in far - flung galaxies or very distant futures. For example, in her works, the problems she explores are often related to current social and political trends, just with a bit of a speculative twist. So, it gives the impression that she's not writing pure science fiction. Also, her exploration of themes like gender, power, and environmental issues might seem more in line with literary fiction than the typical science - fiction fare.
They might be trying to make a point about how much they like science fiction.
It's likely due to ignorance and prejudice. Some people may be resistant to change and the diversification of the science fiction genre.
Another reason might be that they are more interested in other aspects of education or teachers, like the challenges they face in the modern educational system, the training they receive, or the political and economic factors that affect their work. Heartwarming stories often don't touch on these more complex and real - world issues.
Maybe they love the movie so much that they want to hear again whatever was said about it. For instance, if it was a trivia fact.
Well, it might be that this person has a very warped view of the world. They could be lumping dogs together with something they consider 'filthy' in the context of a type of writing like 'pulp fiction' perhaps because they see dogs as common or unrefined in some strange way. But it's really not a fair or accurate view of dogs at all.
Perhaps because it deviated from the expected story arc. If it had elements that were not in line with the essence of the original Mulan, like strange character motives, then it could be seen as fan - fiction - like.
Maybe they think it comes across as boastful. People don't always like to see others constantly flaunting their achievements on social media. It can seem a bit self - centered.
Someone might say it because they want to focus on the original work. Fan fiction can be a distraction from the real essence of the original story.
Perhaps they are really into the style and themes of 'Pulp Fiction' and see a relationship or connection in it that they feel strongly about, so they express it this way.