No, it's not a common phrase at all. I've rarely, if ever, heard it used in everyday language.
Definitely not a common phrase. It has a very unique and somewhat esoteric feel to it. It's the kind of phrase that might be found in a very niche piece of literature, perhaps a horror or mystery story where the author is trying to create a sense of unease and mystery. But in general conversation or common parlance, it's not something you'd expect to hear.
The phrase 'a hand in the darkness after stories' is quite evocative. The 'hand in the darkness' is a rather spooky and uncertain image. When we consider it in relation to 'after stories', it could mean that there is some kind of lingering presence or action that occurs once the stories have ended. For example, in a series of tales about a haunted house, this could be the lingering spirit's hand still causing things to happen even after the stories of the hauntings have been shared. It could also be a more abstract concept, such as the influence of the stories themselves reaching out in an unseen way, like a hand in the darkness.
The Left Hand of Darkness 'original name was Zhang Luoyang, a Chinese web novelist. His representative works included " Dark Left Hand " and others. " The Left Hand of Darkness " was a novel with science fiction elements. It told the story of the Earth being invaded by aliens in the future, and the fierce battle for survival. The novel was widely praised by readers and was regarded as one of the representative works of Chinese science fiction.
Yes, it is relatively common. People often use it to signify the end of a discussion or a sequence of events that could be considered as stories.
Definitely not. Common phrases usually have words that are widely known and used in the correct context. Here, 'fick' is an unknown term and the whole phrase doesn't sound like something people would commonly say. It could be a very specific or made - up phrase within a small group or by someone who made a mistake in their word choice.
Yes, it is. The book explores gender roles and challenges traditional notions, which is a key aspect of feminist literature.
No, it's not a very common phrase in general English usage.
No, it's not a very common phrase in general language. It's more of a specific statement that would be used in the context of talking about an ex - partner's activity, especially in relation to digital content like stories on social media.
Definitely not a common phrase. Most people would use more general terms when referring to someone selling stories. This phrase might be very specific to a particular situation, family or story that we are not aware of without more context.
No, it's not a common phrase at all. I've rarely, if ever, heard this particular combination of words in general English usage.
I would say it's not a common phrase at all. Most people would not use this combination of words when discussing stories, whether they are sexual in nature or not. There are more common ways to talk about interruptions or elements within a story, and this just doesn't seem to be one of them.